Concurrent validity of PROMIS metrics with the EOSQ-24 in early onset scoliosis.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karina A Zapata, James J McGinley, Chan-Hee Jo, Brandon A Ramo
{"title":"Concurrent validity of PROMIS metrics with the EOSQ-24 in early onset scoliosis.","authors":"Karina A Zapata, James J McGinley, Chan-Hee Jo, Brandon A Ramo","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01116-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the concurrent validity of 3 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric metrics (Mobility, Pain Interference, and Anxiety) in Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) by using the 24-item EOS Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) as an anchor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed PRO data of children with EOS from April 2021 to June 2023. PROMIS Pain Interference, Mobility, Anxiety, and EOSQ-24 were simultaneously completed. Comparisons were made according to each EOSQ-24 domain with Pearson correlations. Correlations above 0.7 indicate a strong relationship, 0.4 to 0.69 indicate a moderate relationship, and 0.1 to 0.39 indicate a weak relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>236 children (84 boys, 152 girls) ages 10.4 ± 3.5 years (range: 5-19 years) with curves averaging 39° ± 22° were included. The strongest correlations between the 3 PROMIS metrics and each EOSQ-24 domain were between Mobility and EOSQ-24 Physical function (r = 0.75, p < 0.001), Pain Interference and EOSQ-24 Pain/discomfort (r = -0.68, p < 0.001), and Anxiety and EOSQ-24 Emotion (r = -0.51, p < 0.001). The weakest correlations between all 3 PROMIS metrics and each EOSQ-24 domain were for General health (r ≤ 0.35, p < 0.001), Financial impact (r ≤ 0.36, p < 0.001), and Pulmonary function (r ≤ 0.39, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3 PROMIS metrics (Mobility, Pain Interference, Anxiety) demonstrate moderate to strong validity with the related EOSQ-24 domains (Physical function, Pain/discomfort, Emotion). The weak associations between EOS-specific concerns demonstrate diverging constructs. This study supports the use of the EOSQ-24 given the adequate associations with the appropriate domains while highlighting the value of other EOSQ domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01116-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the concurrent validity of 3 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric metrics (Mobility, Pain Interference, and Anxiety) in Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) by using the 24-item EOS Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) as an anchor.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed PRO data of children with EOS from April 2021 to June 2023. PROMIS Pain Interference, Mobility, Anxiety, and EOSQ-24 were simultaneously completed. Comparisons were made according to each EOSQ-24 domain with Pearson correlations. Correlations above 0.7 indicate a strong relationship, 0.4 to 0.69 indicate a moderate relationship, and 0.1 to 0.39 indicate a weak relationship.

Results: 236 children (84 boys, 152 girls) ages 10.4 ± 3.5 years (range: 5-19 years) with curves averaging 39° ± 22° were included. The strongest correlations between the 3 PROMIS metrics and each EOSQ-24 domain were between Mobility and EOSQ-24 Physical function (r = 0.75, p < 0.001), Pain Interference and EOSQ-24 Pain/discomfort (r = -0.68, p < 0.001), and Anxiety and EOSQ-24 Emotion (r = -0.51, p < 0.001). The weakest correlations between all 3 PROMIS metrics and each EOSQ-24 domain were for General health (r ≤ 0.35, p < 0.001), Financial impact (r ≤ 0.36, p < 0.001), and Pulmonary function (r ≤ 0.39, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The 3 PROMIS metrics (Mobility, Pain Interference, Anxiety) demonstrate moderate to strong validity with the related EOSQ-24 domains (Physical function, Pain/discomfort, Emotion). The weak associations between EOS-specific concerns demonstrate diverging constructs. This study supports the use of the EOSQ-24 given the adequate associations with the appropriate domains while highlighting the value of other EOSQ domains.

PROMIS指标与EOSQ-24在早发性脊柱侧凸中的并发有效性
目的:以24项脊柱侧凸问卷(EOSQ-24)为锚点,评估3项患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)儿科指标(活动能力、疼痛干扰和焦虑)在早发性脊柱侧凸(EOS)中的并发效度。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2021年4月至2023年6月EOS患儿的PRO数据。PROMIS疼痛干扰、活动能力、焦虑和EOSQ-24同时完成。根据各EOSQ-24结构域进行Pearson相关性比较。相关系数高于0.7表示关系强,0.4至0.69表示关系中等,0.1至0.39表示关系弱。结果:236例儿童(男84例,女152例),年龄10.4±3.5岁(范围5-19岁),曲线平均39°±22°。活动度与EOSQ-24生理功能之间的相关性最强(r = 0.75, p)。结论:活动度、疼痛干扰、焦虑与EOSQ-24生理功能、疼痛/不适、情绪的相关性为中高效度。eos特定关注点之间的弱关联显示出不同的构念。本研究支持使用EOSQ-24,因为它与适当的结构域有充分的关联,同时强调了其他EOSQ结构域的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信