Reduction in the Concomitant Ordering of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Within a Large Academic Medical Center.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ruchi Desai, Ray Zhang, Nainesh Shah, Maria Bacalao, Haidy Galous, David R Karp, Puneet Bajaj
{"title":"Reduction in the Concomitant Ordering of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein Within a Large Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Ruchi Desai, Ray Zhang, Nainesh Shah, Maria Bacalao, Haidy Galous, David R Karp, Puneet Bajaj","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09632-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are two laboratory tests often ordered simultaneously to assess for inflammation. Studies show that CRP is superior to ESR, and co-ordering ESR and CRP increases expenditures and phlebotomy without demonstrable patient benefit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our quality improvement project aimed to reduce ESR/CRP co-ordering and total ESR orders in a safety-net health setting (health system 1) and a university setting (health system 2) within an academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Design/interventions: </strong>Using plan, do, study, act (PDSA) methodology, we developed education and electronic health record (EHR) interventions, which included education to all rheumatology providers, targeted education to rheumatology providers with the highest ESR/CRP co-orders, removal of ESR from the rheumatology order set at health system 2, and implementation of a non-intrusive clinical decision support (CDS) change at both hospitals.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>We compared ESR/CRP co-orders, ESR-only orders, and CRP-only orders between pre- and post-intervention periods, as well as weekly average orders per 1000 patient days in the inpatient setting and per 1000 patient encounters in the outpatient setting and rheumatology clinics.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>In health system 1, average weekly ESR/CRP co-orders decreased by 25%, ESR-only orders decreased by 26%, and CRP-only orders increased by 11%. In health system 2, average weekly ESR/CRP co-orders decreased by 36%, ESR-only orders decreased by 47%, and CRP-only orders increased by 65%. Most of the change was seen in the outpatient setting, with >80% reduction in ESR/CRP co-ordering by the rheumatology division in both health systems. Using ESR and CRP Medicare reimbursement rates, estimated payer savings system-wide were $59,354.33 over 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Specialty-led and targeted educational interventions and non-intrusive simple EHR CDS changes are effective in reducing redundant laboratory testing to provide higher value care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09632-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are two laboratory tests often ordered simultaneously to assess for inflammation. Studies show that CRP is superior to ESR, and co-ordering ESR and CRP increases expenditures and phlebotomy without demonstrable patient benefit.

Objective: Our quality improvement project aimed to reduce ESR/CRP co-ordering and total ESR orders in a safety-net health setting (health system 1) and a university setting (health system 2) within an academic medical center.

Design/interventions: Using plan, do, study, act (PDSA) methodology, we developed education and electronic health record (EHR) interventions, which included education to all rheumatology providers, targeted education to rheumatology providers with the highest ESR/CRP co-orders, removal of ESR from the rheumatology order set at health system 2, and implementation of a non-intrusive clinical decision support (CDS) change at both hospitals.

Main measures: We compared ESR/CRP co-orders, ESR-only orders, and CRP-only orders between pre- and post-intervention periods, as well as weekly average orders per 1000 patient days in the inpatient setting and per 1000 patient encounters in the outpatient setting and rheumatology clinics.

Key results: In health system 1, average weekly ESR/CRP co-orders decreased by 25%, ESR-only orders decreased by 26%, and CRP-only orders increased by 11%. In health system 2, average weekly ESR/CRP co-orders decreased by 36%, ESR-only orders decreased by 47%, and CRP-only orders increased by 65%. Most of the change was seen in the outpatient setting, with >80% reduction in ESR/CRP co-ordering by the rheumatology division in both health systems. Using ESR and CRP Medicare reimbursement rates, estimated payer savings system-wide were $59,354.33 over 1 year.

Conclusion: Specialty-led and targeted educational interventions and non-intrusive simple EHR CDS changes are effective in reducing redundant laboratory testing to provide higher value care.

大型学术医疗中心红细胞沉降率和c反应蛋白随序的降低。
背景:红细胞沉降率(ESR)和c反应蛋白(CRP)是两项实验室检查,通常同时用于评估炎症。研究表明,CRP优于ESR,而ESR和CRP合用增加了支出和静脉切开术,但没有明显的患者获益。目的:我们的质量改进项目旨在减少学术性医疗中心内安全网卫生环境(卫生系统1)和大学环境(卫生系统2)中ESR/CRP的共排序和总ESR订单。设计/干预:采用计划、行动、研究、行动(PDSA)方法,我们开发了教育和电子健康记录(EHR)干预措施,其中包括对所有风湿病医生的教育,对ESR/CRP合订单最高的风湿病医生的针对性教育,从卫生系统2的风湿病医嘱中删除ESR,并在两家医院实施非侵入性临床决策支持(CDS)改变。主要措施:我们比较了干预前和干预后ESR/CRP联合订单、ESR-单订单和CRP-单订单,以及住院每1000个患者日的每周平均订单和门诊和风湿病诊所每1000个患者的平均订单。主要结果:在卫生系统1中,平均每周ESR/CRP联合订单减少了25%,仅ESR订单减少了26%,仅CRP订单增加了11%。在卫生系统2中,平均每周ESR/CRP联合订单减少了36%,仅ESR订单减少了47%,仅CRP订单增加了65%。大多数变化发生在门诊,两个卫生系统的风湿病科共同订购的ESR/CRP减少了约80%。使用ESR和CRP医疗保险报销率,估计1年内全系统的付款人储蓄为59,354.33美元。结论:以专科为主导、有针对性的教育干预和非侵入性的简单EHR CDS改变可有效减少重复实验室检测,提供更高价值的医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信