Protocol for a pragmatic trial to enhance quality safety, and patient experience in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (EQuiP-COPD)

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Lucas M. Donovan , Laura C. Feemster , Margaret P. Collins , Emily E. Gleason , Kevin Josey , Kevin I. Duan , Robert Plumley , Scott Coggeshall , Travis Hee Wai , Valentina Petrova , Logan Trenaman , Melissa Atwood , Philip Ballance , Arianne K. Baldomero , Fiona Gillen , Jennifer Gunter , Julianne Isaac , Henna Kara , Kenneth W. Kizer , Allison A. Lambert , David H. Au
{"title":"Protocol for a pragmatic trial to enhance quality safety, and patient experience in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (EQuiP-COPD)","authors":"Lucas M. Donovan ,&nbsp;Laura C. Feemster ,&nbsp;Margaret P. Collins ,&nbsp;Emily E. Gleason ,&nbsp;Kevin Josey ,&nbsp;Kevin I. Duan ,&nbsp;Robert Plumley ,&nbsp;Scott Coggeshall ,&nbsp;Travis Hee Wai ,&nbsp;Valentina Petrova ,&nbsp;Logan Trenaman ,&nbsp;Melissa Atwood ,&nbsp;Philip Ballance ,&nbsp;Arianne K. Baldomero ,&nbsp;Fiona Gillen ,&nbsp;Jennifer Gunter ,&nbsp;Julianne Isaac ,&nbsp;Henna Kara ,&nbsp;Kenneth W. Kizer ,&nbsp;Allison A. Lambert ,&nbsp;David H. Au","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2025.107961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects nearly 26 million Americans, causes functional impairment and reduced quality of life, and is the fifth leading cause of death. Evidence-based therapies can reduce morbidity and improve symptoms, but too few patients receive them. Moreover, many patients receive unnecessary treatments that increase risks of harm. Systematic and population-based approaches are needed to address the widespread gaps in care. Among these, high-quality evidence shows that proactive electronic consultations to primary care providers can improve COPD care quality and clinical outcomes. While effective, these strategies rely on pulmonary specialists who are a scarce and costly resource nationwide. Given their relevant expertise, there is increasing interest around clinical pharmacist-led population management of COPD, but the effectiveness of this approach is unclear. We designed the cluster-randomized EQuiP-COPD trial to test the non-inferiority of clinical pharmacist relative to pulmonary specialist-led population health management of COPD. The primary outcome is the composite endpoint of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, all-cause hospitalization, or death. Secondary outcomes will compare disease-related quality of life, quality of care, costs incurred by patients and caregivers, and heterogeneity of treatment effect. We will also conduct qualitative interviews among patients and staff to elicit experiences with the intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 107961"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714425001557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects nearly 26 million Americans, causes functional impairment and reduced quality of life, and is the fifth leading cause of death. Evidence-based therapies can reduce morbidity and improve symptoms, but too few patients receive them. Moreover, many patients receive unnecessary treatments that increase risks of harm. Systematic and population-based approaches are needed to address the widespread gaps in care. Among these, high-quality evidence shows that proactive electronic consultations to primary care providers can improve COPD care quality and clinical outcomes. While effective, these strategies rely on pulmonary specialists who are a scarce and costly resource nationwide. Given their relevant expertise, there is increasing interest around clinical pharmacist-led population management of COPD, but the effectiveness of this approach is unclear. We designed the cluster-randomized EQuiP-COPD trial to test the non-inferiority of clinical pharmacist relative to pulmonary specialist-led population health management of COPD. The primary outcome is the composite endpoint of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, all-cause hospitalization, or death. Secondary outcomes will compare disease-related quality of life, quality of care, costs incurred by patients and caregivers, and heterogeneity of treatment effect. We will also conduct qualitative interviews among patients and staff to elicit experiences with the intervention.
一项旨在提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病(EQuiP-COPD)质量、安全性和患者体验的实用试验方案。
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)影响了近2600万美国人,导致功能障碍和生活质量下降,是第五大死亡原因。循证疗法可以降低发病率并改善症状,但接受这种疗法的患者太少。此外,许多患者接受了不必要的治疗,增加了伤害的风险。需要有系统的、以人口为基础的方法来解决保健方面的普遍差距。其中,高质量的证据表明,主动向初级保健提供者进行电子咨询可以改善COPD护理质量和临床结果。虽然有效,但这些策略依赖于肺病专家,而这些专家在全国范围内是稀缺且昂贵的资源。鉴于他们的相关专业知识,人们对临床药师领导的COPD人群管理越来越感兴趣,但这种方法的有效性尚不清楚。我们设计了分组随机的EQuiP-COPD试验,以检验临床药师相对于肺病专科医生主导的COPD人群健康管理的非劣效性。主要终点是COPD加重、肺炎、全因住院或死亡的复合终点。次要结局将比较疾病相关的生活质量、护理质量、患者和护理人员的费用以及治疗效果的异质性。我们还将对患者和工作人员进行定性访谈,以获得干预的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信