Widening gap in life expectancy between patients with heart failure living in most and least deprived areas: a longitudinal cohort study.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
O I Brown, M Drozd, H MacGowan, M McGinlay, R Burgess, S Straw, A D Simms, V K Gatenby, A Sengupta, A M N Walker, C Saunderson, M F Paton, K I Bridge, J Gierula, K K Witte, R M Cubbon, M T Kearney
{"title":"Widening gap in life expectancy between patients with heart failure living in most and least deprived areas: a longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"O I Brown, M Drozd, H MacGowan, M McGinlay, R Burgess, S Straw, A D Simms, V K Gatenby, A Sengupta, A M N Walker, C Saunderson, M F Paton, K I Bridge, J Gierula, K K Witte, R M Cubbon, M T Kearney","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04137-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, in the context of improved medical and device therapy for HF, it is unknown whether the influence of socioeconomic deprivation on HF outcomes is changing over time, especially in relation to evolving life expectancy patterns in the general population. Therefore, we aimed to describe temporal trends in the association of socioeconomic deprivation with loss of actuarially predicted life expectancy amongst ambulatory patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2006 and 2014, 1802 patients (73.2% male, mean age 69.6 years) with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% were consecutively recruited across four hospitals in the United Kingdom (UK). Patients were stratified into socioeconomic deprivation tertiles defined by the UK Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score with IMD tertile 1 denoting the least deprived and IMD tertile 3 the most deprived. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and relative survival predictions-in relation to age- and sex-matched background mortality rates-were calculated using UK National Life Tables. Relative survival was illustrated in terms of excess mortality risk and years of life expectancy lost. Recruitment period was split into 3-year intervals (2006-2008, 2009-2011 and 2012-2014).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 5.0 years, 1302 participants (72.3%) died. Unadjusted mortality rate was highest in tertile 2. However, adjusted to the age-sex matched UK population, a stepwise increase in excess mortality risk was observed across tertiles, with tertile 1 experiencing an excess mortality risk of 11.1% (95% CI: 6.1-16.1%) and tertile 3 24.2% (95% CI: 19.4-28.0%). This corresponded to a loss of life expectancy of 1.76 years (95% CI: 1.50-2.03) for tertile 1 and 2.30 years (95% CI: 2.03-2.57) for tertile 3 over a 10-year period. We observed disparity in actuarial survival between tertiles over time, with participants in tertile 1 losing less life expectancy at 10 years compared to those in tertiles 2 and 3. However this was only statistically significant for those recruited between 2012 and 2014 (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on HF outcomes in an unselected diverse UK population appears to have worsened over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"303"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12121114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04137-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). However, in the context of improved medical and device therapy for HF, it is unknown whether the influence of socioeconomic deprivation on HF outcomes is changing over time, especially in relation to evolving life expectancy patterns in the general population. Therefore, we aimed to describe temporal trends in the association of socioeconomic deprivation with loss of actuarially predicted life expectancy amongst ambulatory patients with HF.

Methods: Between 2006 and 2014, 1802 patients (73.2% male, mean age 69.6 years) with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 45% were consecutively recruited across four hospitals in the United Kingdom (UK). Patients were stratified into socioeconomic deprivation tertiles defined by the UK Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score with IMD tertile 1 denoting the least deprived and IMD tertile 3 the most deprived. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and relative survival predictions-in relation to age- and sex-matched background mortality rates-were calculated using UK National Life Tables. Relative survival was illustrated in terms of excess mortality risk and years of life expectancy lost. Recruitment period was split into 3-year intervals (2006-2008, 2009-2011 and 2012-2014).

Results: During a median follow-up of 5.0 years, 1302 participants (72.3%) died. Unadjusted mortality rate was highest in tertile 2. However, adjusted to the age-sex matched UK population, a stepwise increase in excess mortality risk was observed across tertiles, with tertile 1 experiencing an excess mortality risk of 11.1% (95% CI: 6.1-16.1%) and tertile 3 24.2% (95% CI: 19.4-28.0%). This corresponded to a loss of life expectancy of 1.76 years (95% CI: 1.50-2.03) for tertile 1 and 2.30 years (95% CI: 2.03-2.57) for tertile 3 over a 10-year period. We observed disparity in actuarial survival between tertiles over time, with participants in tertile 1 losing less life expectancy at 10 years compared to those in tertiles 2 and 3. However this was only statistically significant for those recruited between 2012 and 2014 (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on HF outcomes in an unselected diverse UK population appears to have worsened over time.

生活在最贫困地区和最贫困地区的心力衰竭患者预期寿命差距扩大:一项纵向队列研究。
背景:社会经济剥夺与心力衰竭(HF)患者的不良临床结果相关。然而,在改善心衰医疗和器械治疗的背景下,尚不清楚社会经济剥夺对心衰结局的影响是否随着时间的推移而改变,特别是与普通人群不断变化的预期寿命模式有关。因此,我们的目的是描述社会经济剥夺与心衰门诊患者精算预测预期寿命损失之间关系的时间趋势。方法:2006 - 2014年,在英国4家医院连续招募1802例HF且左室射血分数≤45%的患者(73.2%男性,平均年龄69.6岁)。根据英国多重剥夺指数(IMD)评分将患者分为社会经济剥夺分位数,IMD分位数为1表示最不贫困,IMD分位数为3表示最贫困。主要结果是全因死亡率,相对生存预测-与年龄和性别匹配的背景死亡率相关-使用英国国家生命表计算。相对存活率用超额死亡风险和预期寿命损失年数来说明。招聘期分为3年(2006-2008年、2009-2011年和2012-2014年)。结果:在中位随访5.0年期间,1302名参与者(72.3%)死亡。未调整死亡率最高的是第2组。然而,对年龄性别匹配的英国人群进行调整后,观察到各组的超额死亡风险逐步增加,各组1的超额死亡风险为11.1% (95% CI: 6.1-16.1%),各组3的超额死亡风险为24.2% (95% CI: 19.4-28.0%)。这相当于在10年的时间里,三分之一的预期寿命损失1.76年(95% CI: 1.50-2.03),三分之一的预期寿命损失2.30年(95% CI: 2.03-2.57)。随着时间的推移,我们观察到各组之间精算存活率的差异,与各组2和3相比,各组1的参与者在10年的预期寿命损失更少。然而,这仅在2012年至2014年间招募的人群中具有统计学意义(p)。结论:在未选择的不同英国人群中,社会经济剥夺对HF结局的影响似乎随着时间的推移而恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信