Fusion of Vis-Near and Mid-Infrared Spectroscopic Data for a Prediction of Biochar C, Native Soil Organic C and Root C in a Designed Experiment With Loess Soils
{"title":"Fusion of Vis-Near and Mid-Infrared Spectroscopic Data for a Prediction of Biochar C, Native Soil Organic C and Root C in a Designed Experiment With Loess Soils","authors":"Simon Kohlmann, Isabel Greenberg, Bernard Ludwig","doi":"10.1002/jpln.202400364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The accuracy of predictions using visible to near-infrared (vis–NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy for different organic compounds in arable soils is not sufficiently quantified and designed experiments are useful to assess the potential.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Objectives were to quantify the predictive accuracy of regressions using MIR and vis–NIR spectra for total organic carbon (OC), native soil OC (native SOC), aged biochar and root C in loess soils.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Maize roots and biochar were added at mean rates (± standard deviation) of 2 (±0.5) and 15 (±3.75) g C kg<sup>−1</sup> to soils from three different loess sites to obtain 450 soils and their spectra were recorded. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector machine regressions (SVMR) were used in three-fold partitioning with (1) pseudo-independent calibration and validation and (2) calibration and validation for the respective sites with and without spiking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data fusion (concatenation or outer product analysis) using SVMR were the most successful approaches in the validations for all training strategies (0.81 ≤ mean <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≤ 0.98) for total OC, added biochar C, combined native SOC + added root C, and native SOC, but failed to accurately predict added root C separately from total OC. Variable importance in the projection of PLSR indicated a good differentiation between biochar C and other organic compounds, but not between native SOC + added root C and native SOC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>For rates of root and biochar C inputs which are typical in agricultural experiments, fusion and spiking allowed a quantitative differentiation of total OC into biochar C and native SOC + root C, but not a separate quantification of root C.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science","volume":"188 3","pages":"430-446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpln.202400364","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpln.202400364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The accuracy of predictions using visible to near-infrared (vis–NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopy for different organic compounds in arable soils is not sufficiently quantified and designed experiments are useful to assess the potential.
Aim
Objectives were to quantify the predictive accuracy of regressions using MIR and vis–NIR spectra for total organic carbon (OC), native soil OC (native SOC), aged biochar and root C in loess soils.
Methods
Maize roots and biochar were added at mean rates (± standard deviation) of 2 (±0.5) and 15 (±3.75) g C kg−1 to soils from three different loess sites to obtain 450 soils and their spectra were recorded. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) and support vector machine regressions (SVMR) were used in three-fold partitioning with (1) pseudo-independent calibration and validation and (2) calibration and validation for the respective sites with and without spiking.
Results
Data fusion (concatenation or outer product analysis) using SVMR were the most successful approaches in the validations for all training strategies (0.81 ≤ mean R2 ≤ 0.98) for total OC, added biochar C, combined native SOC + added root C, and native SOC, but failed to accurately predict added root C separately from total OC. Variable importance in the projection of PLSR indicated a good differentiation between biochar C and other organic compounds, but not between native SOC + added root C and native SOC.
Conclusions
For rates of root and biochar C inputs which are typical in agricultural experiments, fusion and spiking allowed a quantitative differentiation of total OC into biochar C and native SOC + root C, but not a separate quantification of root C.
利用可见到近红外(vis-NIR)和中红外(MIR)光谱对耕地土壤中不同有机化合物的预测精度还不能充分量化,设计实验有助于评估其潜力。目的量化MIR和可见光-近红外光谱对黄土土壤中总有机碳(OC)、原生土壤有机碳(SOC)、陈化生物炭和根碳的回归预测精度。方法分别以2(±0.5)和15(±3.75)g C kg−1的平均添加量(±标准差)添加玉米根和生物炭到3个不同黄土样地的土壤中,得到450个土壤,并记录其光谱。采用偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)和支持向量机回归(SVMR)进行三重划分,分别进行(1)伪独立校准和验证,(2)有峰值和没有峰值的各自位点的校准和验证。结果对于总碳含量、添加的生物炭碳含量、天然碳含量+添加的根碳含量和天然碳含量,采用SVMR进行数据融合(串联或外产物分析)的方法在所有训练策略的验证中最成功(0.81≤平均R2≤0.98),但不能准确预测添加的根碳含量和总碳含量。PLSR投影的可变重要性表明,生物炭碳与其他有机化合物之间存在良好的分化,而原生有机碳+添加根碳与原生有机碳之间存在差异。对于农业试验中典型的根碳和生物炭碳输入速率,融合和穗化可以将总有机碳定量分化为生物炭碳和原生有机碳+根碳,但不能单独量化根碳。
期刊介绍:
Established in 1922, the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (JPNSS) is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to cover the entire spectrum of plant nutrition and soil science from different scale units, e.g. agroecosystem to natural systems. With its wide scope and focus on soil-plant interactions, JPNSS is one of the leading journals on this topic. Articles in JPNSS include reviews, high-standard original papers, and short communications and represent challenging research of international significance. The Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science is one of the world’s oldest journals. You can trust in a peer-reviewed journal that has been established in the plant and soil science community for almost 100 years.
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (ISSN 1436-8730) is published in six volumes per year, by the German Societies of Plant Nutrition (DGP) and Soil Science (DBG). Furthermore, the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (JPNSS) is a Cooperating Journal of the International Union of Soil Science (IUSS). The journal is produced by Wiley-VCH.
Topical Divisions of the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science that are receiving increasing attention are:
JPNSS – Topical Divisions
Special timely focus in interdisciplinarity:
- sustainability & critical zone science.
Soil-Plant Interactions:
- rhizosphere science & soil ecology
- pollutant cycling & plant-soil protection
- land use & climate change.
Soil Science:
- soil chemistry & soil physics
- soil biology & biogeochemistry
- soil genesis & mineralogy.
Plant Nutrition:
- plant nutritional physiology
- nutrient dynamics & soil fertility
- ecophysiological aspects of plant nutrition.