Feature Graph Construction With Static Features for Malware Detection

IF 1.3 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Binghui Zou, Chunjie Cao, Longjuan Wang, Yinan Cheng, Chenxi Dang, Ying Liu, Jingzhang Sun
{"title":"Feature Graph Construction With Static Features for Malware Detection","authors":"Binghui Zou,&nbsp;Chunjie Cao,&nbsp;Longjuan Wang,&nbsp;Yinan Cheng,&nbsp;Chenxi Dang,&nbsp;Ying Liu,&nbsp;Jingzhang Sun","doi":"10.1049/ise2/6687383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Malware can greatly compromise the integrity and trustworthiness of information and is in a constant state of evolution. Existing feature fusion-based detection methods generally overlook the correlation between features. And mere concatenation of features will reduce the model’s characterization ability, lead to low detection accuracy. Moreover, these methods are susceptible to concept drift and significant degradation of the model. To address those challenges, we introduce a feature graph-based malware detection method, malware feature graph (MFGraph), to characterize applications by learning feature-to-feature relationships to achieve improved detection accuracy while mitigating the impact of concept drift. In MFGraph, we construct a feature graph using static features extracted from binary PE files, then apply a deep graph convolutional network to learn the representation of the feature graph. Finally, we employ the representation vectors obtained from the output of a three-layer perceptron to differentiate between benign and malicious software. We evaluated our method on the EMBER dataset, and the experimental results demonstrate that it achieves an AUC score of 0.98756 on the malware detection task, outperforming other baseline models. Furthermore, the AUC score of MFGraph decreases by only 5.884% in 1 year, indicating that it is the least affected by concept drift.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50380,"journal":{"name":"IET Information Security","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/ise2/6687383","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Information Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/ise2/6687383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Malware can greatly compromise the integrity and trustworthiness of information and is in a constant state of evolution. Existing feature fusion-based detection methods generally overlook the correlation between features. And mere concatenation of features will reduce the model’s characterization ability, lead to low detection accuracy. Moreover, these methods are susceptible to concept drift and significant degradation of the model. To address those challenges, we introduce a feature graph-based malware detection method, malware feature graph (MFGraph), to characterize applications by learning feature-to-feature relationships to achieve improved detection accuracy while mitigating the impact of concept drift. In MFGraph, we construct a feature graph using static features extracted from binary PE files, then apply a deep graph convolutional network to learn the representation of the feature graph. Finally, we employ the representation vectors obtained from the output of a three-layer perceptron to differentiate between benign and malicious software. We evaluated our method on the EMBER dataset, and the experimental results demonstrate that it achieves an AUC score of 0.98756 on the malware detection task, outperforming other baseline models. Furthermore, the AUC score of MFGraph decreases by only 5.884% in 1 year, indicating that it is the least affected by concept drift.

基于静态特征的恶意软件检测特征图构建
恶意软件可以极大地损害信息的完整性和可信度,并且处于不断发展的状态。现有的基于特征融合的检测方法通常忽略了特征之间的相关性。而单纯的特征拼接会降低模型的表征能力,导致检测精度低。此外,这些方法容易受到概念漂移和模型严重退化的影响。为了解决这些挑战,我们引入了一种基于特征图的恶意软件检测方法,恶意软件特征图(MFGraph),通过学习特征与特征之间的关系来表征应用程序,以提高检测精度,同时减轻概念漂移的影响。在MFGraph中,我们使用从二进制PE文件中提取的静态特征构造特征图,然后应用深度图卷积网络来学习特征图的表示。最后,我们使用从三层感知器的输出中获得的表示向量来区分良性和恶意软件。我们在EMBER数据集上对该方法进行了评估,实验结果表明,该方法在恶意软件检测任务上的AUC得分为0.98756,优于其他基准模型。此外,MFGraph的AUC得分在1年内仅下降了5.884%,表明它受概念漂移的影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IET Information Security
IET Information Security 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: IET Information Security publishes original research papers in the following areas of information security and cryptography. Submitting authors should specify clearly in their covering statement the area into which their paper falls. Scope: Access Control and Database Security Ad-Hoc Network Aspects Anonymity and E-Voting Authentication Block Ciphers and Hash Functions Blockchain, Bitcoin (Technical aspects only) Broadcast Encryption and Traitor Tracing Combinatorial Aspects Covert Channels and Information Flow Critical Infrastructures Cryptanalysis Dependability Digital Rights Management Digital Signature Schemes Digital Steganography Economic Aspects of Information Security Elliptic Curve Cryptography and Number Theory Embedded Systems Aspects Embedded Systems Security and Forensics Financial Cryptography Firewall Security Formal Methods and Security Verification Human Aspects Information Warfare and Survivability Intrusion Detection Java and XML Security Key Distribution Key Management Malware Multi-Party Computation and Threshold Cryptography Peer-to-peer Security PKIs Public-Key and Hybrid Encryption Quantum Cryptography Risks of using Computers Robust Networks Secret Sharing Secure Electronic Commerce Software Obfuscation Stream Ciphers Trust Models Watermarking and Fingerprinting Special Issues. Current Call for Papers: Security on Mobile and IoT devices - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_IFS_SMID_CFP.pdf
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信