Integrating cover crops and targeted herbicide applications in cotton production

IF 1.5 Q3 AGRONOMY
Tristen H. Avent, Jason K. Norsworthy, Thomas R. Butts, Gerson Drescher
{"title":"Integrating cover crops and targeted herbicide applications in cotton production","authors":"Tristen H. Avent,&nbsp;Jason K. Norsworthy,&nbsp;Thomas R. Butts,&nbsp;Gerson Drescher","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cover crops are part of integrated weed control management to help mitigate herbicide resistance evolution. Targeted sprays from the John Deere See &amp; Spray are currently not recommended in cover crops. Experiments were conducted yearly from 2022 to 2024 in Keiser, AR, to evaluate targeted applications (TAs) with cover crops in cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.). Treatments assessed the main effect of winter cover crop (fallow, cereal rye [<i>Secale cereale</i> L.], or hairy vetch [<i>Vicia villosa</i> Roth]), herbicide application methods (nontreated, broadcast [BC], TA + BC residuals [TA + BCRs], or TA only), and the interaction on cotton tolerance, weed control, and herbicide savings. Cereal rye generally aided weed control efforts across the weeds evaluated, and there were instances of herbicide savings at the preemergence and mid-postemergence (MPOST) timings when using TA or TA + BCR relative to BC. In some instances, TA POST + RES reduced weed control. At layby, TA-only applications reduced Palmer amaranth control by 5–10 percentage points in winter fallow systems compared to the BC in 2022 and 2023. In 2024 at MPOST, low herbicide savings occurred in the winter fallow cover systems (2.9%), whereas TA + BCR saved 29.4% and 26.5% for cereal rye and hairy vetch, respectively. In conclusion, See &amp; Spray improved environmental stewardship and could detect and treat weeds in standing cover crop biomass, providing comparable control to the BC application at the end of the season (≥92% for all species).</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70132","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cover crops are part of integrated weed control management to help mitigate herbicide resistance evolution. Targeted sprays from the John Deere See & Spray are currently not recommended in cover crops. Experiments were conducted yearly from 2022 to 2024 in Keiser, AR, to evaluate targeted applications (TAs) with cover crops in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Treatments assessed the main effect of winter cover crop (fallow, cereal rye [Secale cereale L.], or hairy vetch [Vicia villosa Roth]), herbicide application methods (nontreated, broadcast [BC], TA + BC residuals [TA + BCRs], or TA only), and the interaction on cotton tolerance, weed control, and herbicide savings. Cereal rye generally aided weed control efforts across the weeds evaluated, and there were instances of herbicide savings at the preemergence and mid-postemergence (MPOST) timings when using TA or TA + BCR relative to BC. In some instances, TA POST + RES reduced weed control. At layby, TA-only applications reduced Palmer amaranth control by 5–10 percentage points in winter fallow systems compared to the BC in 2022 and 2023. In 2024 at MPOST, low herbicide savings occurred in the winter fallow cover systems (2.9%), whereas TA + BCR saved 29.4% and 26.5% for cereal rye and hairy vetch, respectively. In conclusion, See & Spray improved environmental stewardship and could detect and treat weeds in standing cover crop biomass, providing comparable control to the BC application at the end of the season (≥92% for all species).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在棉花生产中整合覆盖作物和定向除草剂应用
覆盖作物是杂草综合控制管理的一部分,有助于减缓除草剂抗性的演变。John Deere See &;目前不建议在覆盖作物上喷洒。从2022年到2024年,每年在AR Keiser进行试验,以评估覆盖作物对棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)的定向施用(TAs)。处理评估了冬季覆盖作物(休耕、谷物黑麦[Secale cereale L.]或毛叶野豌豆[Vicia villosa Roth])的主要效果,除草剂施用方法(未处理、撒播[BC]、TA + BC残留[TA + bcr]或仅施用TA),以及对棉花耐受性、杂草控制和除草剂节约的相互作用。小麦黑麦总体上有助于杂草控制工作,并且在苗期前和苗期中期(MPOST)时间使用TA或TA + BCR相对于BC有节省除草剂的实例。在某些情况下,TA POST + RES减少了杂草控制。在冬季休耕系统中,与2022年和2023年的BC相比,仅施用ta可以减少5-10个百分点的紫红花控制。2024年在MPOST,冬季休耕覆盖系统的除草剂节约量较低(2.9%),而TA + BCR分别为谷物黑麦和毛豆节省29.4%和26.5%。总之,参见&;喷淋改善了环境管理,可以检测和处理常绿覆盖作物生物量中的杂草,在季末提供与BC相当的控制(所有物种均≥92%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信