Next leap in the sustainable transport revolution: Identifying gaps and proposing solutions for hydrogen mobility

IF 12.5 Q1 TRANSPORTATION
Fangjie Liu , Muhammad Shafique , Xiaowei Luo
{"title":"Next leap in the sustainable transport revolution: Identifying gaps and proposing solutions for hydrogen mobility","authors":"Fangjie Liu ,&nbsp;Muhammad Shafique ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.commtr.2025.100180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid escalating global climate concerns, the reliance of the transportation sector on high-carbon fossil fuels urgently demands sustainable alternatives. Hydrogen has emerged as a potent solution because of its zero-emission usage, but its overall impact hinges on its full life cycle, which this review comprehensively examines. This article delves into the environmental, economic, and safety dimensions of hydrogen as an alternative fuel by systematically reviewing the life cycle assessment (LCA) literature across the production, storage, delivery, and usage phases, with a focus on electrolysis and natural gas reforming methods, among others. A key insight from this study is the critical importance of considering the entire delivery system holistically rather than isolating the delivery phase. Many studies have overlooked two important aspects: first, the distribution of hydrogen as a product itself is often underemphasized; second, the integration of storage and delivery (the “storage-delivery nexus”) is crucial since separating them can lead to misleading conclusions about cost and emissions. For example, while certain delivery methods may appear cost-effective, their associated storage processes (such as hydrogenation and dehydrogenation in liquid organic hydrogen carrier systems) can have significant emission impacts. To address these gaps, this study introduces a novel “surface-level” LCA framework to enhance the assessment of the environmental impacts of hydrogen, promoting a more integrated understanding of the storage-delivery system. This framework aims to provide more accurate insights into hydrogen's life cycle, thereby facilitating better-informed policy-making and technological advancements. This study underscores the imperative for robust policy support, public engagement, and continuous innovation to overcome these barriers, advocating for strategic initiatives that bolster the sustainability and adoption of hydrogen mobility, particularly in hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100292,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Transportation Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100180"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Transportation Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772424725000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amid escalating global climate concerns, the reliance of the transportation sector on high-carbon fossil fuels urgently demands sustainable alternatives. Hydrogen has emerged as a potent solution because of its zero-emission usage, but its overall impact hinges on its full life cycle, which this review comprehensively examines. This article delves into the environmental, economic, and safety dimensions of hydrogen as an alternative fuel by systematically reviewing the life cycle assessment (LCA) literature across the production, storage, delivery, and usage phases, with a focus on electrolysis and natural gas reforming methods, among others. A key insight from this study is the critical importance of considering the entire delivery system holistically rather than isolating the delivery phase. Many studies have overlooked two important aspects: first, the distribution of hydrogen as a product itself is often underemphasized; second, the integration of storage and delivery (the “storage-delivery nexus”) is crucial since separating them can lead to misleading conclusions about cost and emissions. For example, while certain delivery methods may appear cost-effective, their associated storage processes (such as hydrogenation and dehydrogenation in liquid organic hydrogen carrier systems) can have significant emission impacts. To address these gaps, this study introduces a novel “surface-level” LCA framework to enhance the assessment of the environmental impacts of hydrogen, promoting a more integrated understanding of the storage-delivery system. This framework aims to provide more accurate insights into hydrogen's life cycle, thereby facilitating better-informed policy-making and technological advancements. This study underscores the imperative for robust policy support, public engagement, and continuous innovation to overcome these barriers, advocating for strategic initiatives that bolster the sustainability and adoption of hydrogen mobility, particularly in hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs).
可持续交通革命的下一个飞跃:确定差距并提出氢交通的解决方案
随着全球气候担忧的加剧,交通运输部门对高碳化石燃料的依赖迫切需要可持续的替代品。氢已经成为一种强有力的解决方案,因为它的零排放使用,但它的整体影响取决于它的整个生命周期,这篇综述全面考察了。本文通过系统地回顾生产、储存、输送和使用阶段的生命周期评估(LCA)文献,重点讨论了电解和天然气重整方法等,深入研究了氢作为替代燃料的环境、经济和安全方面的问题。从这项研究中得出的一个关键见解是,从整体上考虑整个交付系统而不是孤立地考虑交付阶段是至关重要的。许多研究忽视了两个重要方面:首先,氢作为产品本身的分布往往被低估;其次,储存和运输的整合(“储存-运输联系”)是至关重要的,因为将它们分开可能会导致关于成本和排放的误导性结论。例如,虽然某些输送方法可能看起来具有成本效益,但它们相关的储存过程(例如液体有机氢载体系统中的加氢和脱氢)可能会对排放产生重大影响。为了解决这些差距,本研究引入了一种新的“表面水平”LCA框架,以加强对氢的环境影响的评估,促进对储存-输送系统的更综合的理解。该框架旨在为氢的生命周期提供更准确的见解,从而促进更明智的政策制定和技术进步。这项研究强调了强有力的政策支持、公众参与和持续创新的必要性,以克服这些障碍,倡导采取战略举措,加强氢交通的可持续性和采用,特别是在氢燃料电池汽车(HFCVs)方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信