Classification of hoarding and comorbid neuropsychiatric symptoms

Sara K. Nutley , Catherine W. Striley , Linda B. Cottler , Joseph Eichenbaum , Rachel L. Nosheny , R. Scott Mackin , Carol A. Mathews
{"title":"Classification of hoarding and comorbid neuropsychiatric symptoms","authors":"Sara K. Nutley ,&nbsp;Catherine W. Striley ,&nbsp;Linda B. Cottler ,&nbsp;Joseph Eichenbaum ,&nbsp;Rachel L. Nosheny ,&nbsp;R. Scott Mackin ,&nbsp;Carol A. Mathews","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2025.100215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Psychiatric comorbidity and self-reported cognitive dysfunction are common among individuals with hoarding disorder (HD). However, common patterns of co-occurring neuropsychiatric symptoms, and their potential impact on the clinical manifestation of hoarding, including functional impairment, are not well-established.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify and characterize distinct neuropsychiatric symptom subgroups among 7606 adult internet-based research participants who reported experiencing social impairment due to household clutter. An additional 1129 participants who screened negative but had evidence of hoarding on additional assessment (“false negative”) were identified and compared to the LCA-identified classes. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with class membership were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The best fitting model yielded five subgroups, including three subgroups characterizing individuals with hoarding symptoms: “hoarding only” (12.1 %), hoarding with depressive symptoms (“depressed + hoarding”; 11.8 %), and hoarding with depressive symptoms, inattention, and subjective memory decline (“multisymptomatic”; 14.6 %). These subgroups fell along a continuum of increasing neuropsychiatric burden, with individuals in the “multisymptomatic” class experiencing the greatest deficits to general functional ability and cognitive functioning, as well as elevated rates of comorbid neuropsychiatric diagnoses. The “false negative” group was similar to the “hoarding only” class, although comprised of a significantly higher proportion of male participants and married individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Neuropsychiatric symptom patterns among individuals with hoarding are heterogenous in nature and uniquely associated with clinical features and functional outcomes. These findings may inform the development of targeted interventions for HD that include assessment and management of depressive symptoms, inattention, and memory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"5 2","pages":"Article 100215"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772598725000145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Psychiatric comorbidity and self-reported cognitive dysfunction are common among individuals with hoarding disorder (HD). However, common patterns of co-occurring neuropsychiatric symptoms, and their potential impact on the clinical manifestation of hoarding, including functional impairment, are not well-established.

Methods

Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify and characterize distinct neuropsychiatric symptom subgroups among 7606 adult internet-based research participants who reported experiencing social impairment due to household clutter. An additional 1129 participants who screened negative but had evidence of hoarding on additional assessment (“false negative”) were identified and compared to the LCA-identified classes. Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with class membership were assessed.

Results

The best fitting model yielded five subgroups, including three subgroups characterizing individuals with hoarding symptoms: “hoarding only” (12.1 %), hoarding with depressive symptoms (“depressed + hoarding”; 11.8 %), and hoarding with depressive symptoms, inattention, and subjective memory decline (“multisymptomatic”; 14.6 %). These subgroups fell along a continuum of increasing neuropsychiatric burden, with individuals in the “multisymptomatic” class experiencing the greatest deficits to general functional ability and cognitive functioning, as well as elevated rates of comorbid neuropsychiatric diagnoses. The “false negative” group was similar to the “hoarding only” class, although comprised of a significantly higher proportion of male participants and married individuals.

Conclusions

Neuropsychiatric symptom patterns among individuals with hoarding are heterogenous in nature and uniquely associated with clinical features and functional outcomes. These findings may inform the development of targeted interventions for HD that include assessment and management of depressive symptoms, inattention, and memory.
囤积症的分类及共病神经精神症状
精神合并症和自我报告的认知功能障碍在囤积障碍(HD)患者中很常见。然而,共同发生的神经精神症状的常见模式,以及它们对囤积症临床表现的潜在影响,包括功能损害,还没有得到证实。方法采用潜在类分析(LCA)对7606名报告因家庭混乱而出现社交障碍的成人互联网研究参与者进行不同神经精神症状亚组的识别和表征。另外1129名筛查阴性但在额外评估中有囤积证据(“假阴性”)的参与者被识别出来,并与lca识别的班级进行比较。评估与班级成员相关的人口学和临床特征。结果最佳拟合模型产生了5个亚组,其中3个亚组表征了囤积症状个体:“仅囤积”(12.1%)、囤积伴抑郁症状(“抑郁+囤积”);11.8%),囤积伴有抑郁症状、注意力不集中和主观记忆力下降(“多症状”;14.6%)。这些亚组随着神经精神负担的增加而下降,“多症状”组的个体在一般功能能力和认知功能方面的缺陷最大,同时共病神经精神诊断的比例也较高。“假阴性”组与“只囤积”组相似,但男性和已婚人士的比例要高得多。结论囤积症患者的神经精神症状模式具有异质性,且与临床特征和功能结局有独特的相关性。这些发现可能为开发针对HD的有针对性的干预措施提供信息,包括抑郁症状、注意力不集中和记忆的评估和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry research communications
Psychiatry research communications Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信