EEG-based listened-language classification

IF 7.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Isaac Ariza , Lorenzo J. Tardón , Ana M. Barbancho , Isabel Barbancho
{"title":"EEG-based listened-language classification","authors":"Isaac Ariza ,&nbsp;Lorenzo J. Tardón ,&nbsp;Ana M. Barbancho ,&nbsp;Isabel Barbancho","doi":"10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>From an early age, individuals are continuously exposed to other languages beyond their native tongue; however, the brain’s response to these auditory stimuli remains unclear. To investigate this, an experiment was designed to record electroencephalography (EEG) signals from subjects listening to sentences in five different languages, and a specific database was built to enable performing classification tests to distinguish between different languages, and varying levels of language comprehension. By analysing the energy difference between the EEG channels to characterize these signals, different classification tests were conducted using bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (bi-LSTM), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural networks.</div><div>The main objective is the analysis of the brain’s response in two different scenarios: when the subject listens to sentences in different languages, and when the subject understands or misunderstands the meaning of a sentence. In the multi-class classification involving sentences in five different languages, the accuracy attained is 36.37 %. However, in the multi-class classification between ‘understood’/‘understood part of the meaning’/‘didn’t understand’, the accuracy attained reaches 81.36 %. The results obtained for binary classification tests of understand native language or foreign language is 89.09 %. The bi-LSTM neural network achieved the overall best performance.</div><div>These results demonstrate that the analysis of the EEG signals alone can give information regarding a person’s language comprehension level, and can be used for monitoring the learning curve of a new language or to assess comprehension in patients with conditions such as aphasia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50461,"journal":{"name":"Expert Systems with Applications","volume":"288 ","pages":"Article 128276"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425018950","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From an early age, individuals are continuously exposed to other languages beyond their native tongue; however, the brain’s response to these auditory stimuli remains unclear. To investigate this, an experiment was designed to record electroencephalography (EEG) signals from subjects listening to sentences in five different languages, and a specific database was built to enable performing classification tests to distinguish between different languages, and varying levels of language comprehension. By analysing the energy difference between the EEG channels to characterize these signals, different classification tests were conducted using bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (bi-LSTM), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) neural networks.
The main objective is the analysis of the brain’s response in two different scenarios: when the subject listens to sentences in different languages, and when the subject understands or misunderstands the meaning of a sentence. In the multi-class classification involving sentences in five different languages, the accuracy attained is 36.37 %. However, in the multi-class classification between ‘understood’/‘understood part of the meaning’/‘didn’t understand’, the accuracy attained reaches 81.36 %. The results obtained for binary classification tests of understand native language or foreign language is 89.09 %. The bi-LSTM neural network achieved the overall best performance.
These results demonstrate that the analysis of the EEG signals alone can give information regarding a person’s language comprehension level, and can be used for monitoring the learning curve of a new language or to assess comprehension in patients with conditions such as aphasia.
基于脑电图的听力语言分类
从很小的时候起,人们就不断接触母语以外的其他语言;然而,大脑对这些听觉刺激的反应尚不清楚。为此,设计了一项实验,记录受试者听五种不同语言句子时的脑电图(EEG)信号,并建立了一个特定的数据库,以便进行分类测试,以区分不同的语言和不同的语言理解水平。利用双向长短期记忆(bi-LSTM)、长短期记忆(LSTM)和门控循环单元(GRU)神经网络对脑电信号进行分类,分析脑电信号通道间的能量差特征。主要目的是分析大脑在两种不同情况下的反应:当受试者听不同语言的句子时,以及当受试者理解或误解句子的意思时。在涉及5种不同语言句子的多类分类中,准确率达到36.37%。而在“理解”/“理解部分意思”/“不理解”的多类分类中,准确率达到81.36%。通晓本族语和外语的二分类测验的通晓率为89.09%。bi-LSTM神经网络的综合性能最好。这些结果表明,单独分析脑电图信号可以提供一个人的语言理解水平的信息,并可用于监测一门新语言的学习曲线或评估失语症患者的理解能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Systems with Applications
Expert Systems with Applications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
10.60%
发文量
2045
审稿时长
8.7 months
期刊介绍: Expert Systems With Applications is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information on expert and intelligent systems used globally in industry, government, and universities. The journal emphasizes original papers covering the design, development, testing, implementation, and management of these systems, offering practical guidelines. It spans various sectors such as finance, engineering, marketing, law, project management, information management, medicine, and more. The journal also welcomes papers on multi-agent systems, knowledge management, neural networks, knowledge discovery, data mining, and other related areas, excluding applications to military/defense systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信