Community leadership in system transformation: A realist review of strategies for effective partnership between communities of color and public systems impacting children and families
Mallory VanMeeter , Shannon Kugley , Elizabeth Dierksheide , Mark McDaniel
{"title":"Community leadership in system transformation: A realist review of strategies for effective partnership between communities of color and public systems impacting children and families","authors":"Mallory VanMeeter , Shannon Kugley , Elizabeth Dierksheide , Mark McDaniel","doi":"10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The child welfare system in the U.S. is long overdue for a reimagination. To bridge the gap between what families say they need to thrive and what child welfare provides, the system must build a new relationship with community—one where residents are valued as collaborators and are supported in taking the lead. A team from Chapin Hall conducted a realist evidence review (Paré et al., 2015) to inform this shift toward community leadership. We focused on public system partnerships with Black and non-Black communities of color to shape policies, programs, and practices impacting children and families. Using a modified grounded theory approach, we analyzed 35 empirical publications on 32 unique projects. We supplemented that evidence with six longitudinal case studies (Bowen, 2009; Morgan & Nica, 2020) and conversations with 10 key informants.</div><div>From these sources, we distilled four sets of strategies for forming and sustaining equitable system change partnerships with Black and non-Black communities of color: 1) adopting anti-racist and strengths-based approaches to working with community, while continuously confronting power and positionality; 2) creating inclusive and flexible opportunities for community leadership; 3) investing in community partners’ personal agency, skills, and capacity for collective action; 4) and embedding community leadership in system decision making through partnership infrastructure and long-term funding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48428,"journal":{"name":"Children and Youth Services Review","volume":"175 ","pages":"Article 108350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Children and Youth Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190740925002336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The child welfare system in the U.S. is long overdue for a reimagination. To bridge the gap between what families say they need to thrive and what child welfare provides, the system must build a new relationship with community—one where residents are valued as collaborators and are supported in taking the lead. A team from Chapin Hall conducted a realist evidence review (Paré et al., 2015) to inform this shift toward community leadership. We focused on public system partnerships with Black and non-Black communities of color to shape policies, programs, and practices impacting children and families. Using a modified grounded theory approach, we analyzed 35 empirical publications on 32 unique projects. We supplemented that evidence with six longitudinal case studies (Bowen, 2009; Morgan & Nica, 2020) and conversations with 10 key informants.
From these sources, we distilled four sets of strategies for forming and sustaining equitable system change partnerships with Black and non-Black communities of color: 1) adopting anti-racist and strengths-based approaches to working with community, while continuously confronting power and positionality; 2) creating inclusive and flexible opportunities for community leadership; 3) investing in community partners’ personal agency, skills, and capacity for collective action; 4) and embedding community leadership in system decision making through partnership infrastructure and long-term funding.
期刊介绍:
Children and Youth Services Review is an interdisciplinary forum for critical scholarship regarding service programs for children and youth. The journal will publish full-length articles, current research and policy notes, and book reviews.