Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Buckle Fracture Treatment.

Mehmet E Kilinc, Evan P Sandefur, Mosufa Zainab, Nicholas J Peterman, Andrea A Yu-Shan, Peter J Apel
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Buckle Fracture Treatment.","authors":"Mehmet E Kilinc, Evan P Sandefur, Mosufa Zainab, Nicholas J Peterman, Andrea A Yu-Shan, Peter J Apel","doi":"10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Based on the existing consensus in the literature, we have coined a term at our institution to describe optimal treatment for distal radius buckle fractures: Buckle Evidence-based Strategic Treatment (BEST). BEST includes a single provider visit, education, a removable wrist brace/bandage, no additional follow-up visits, and no additional X-rays. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many providers were pressured to reduce the number of in-person visits, promote physical distancing, and minimize in-person interaction with the healthcare system. It is unknown if a secondary effect of the COVID-19 pandemic was increased use of BEST practices and if there was a sustained effect. This investigation analyzed the adherence to BEST practices for treating distal radius buckle fractures in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 era.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of buckle fracture care was conducted across 2018-2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 2020-2022 (COVID-19 era). Subset analysis was also conducted for 2020 (peak COVID-19 era) and 2021-2022 (post-peak COVID-19 era). Adherence to BEST practices was assessed by chart review. The provider type was documented and subclassified into fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, non-pediatric fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons, and non-physicians. Analyses were performed using chi-squared testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 602 distal radius buckle fractures met inclusion, with an average patient age of 9.4 years. Pre-COVID-19 BEST practice adherence was 11.15%. During peak COVID-19 era, adherence rates improved significantly to 41.18% (<i>P</i> < .001). This effect was sustained for the post-peak COVID-19 era. There were significantly different rates of adherence depending on provider type (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant increase in BEST practice utilization for buckle fracture management across all provider types. Adherence to BEST practices varied significantly based on provider type, with pediatric fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons having the highest level of adherence. This study demonstrates that external factors can impact treatment decisions for distal radius buckle fractures. Advocacy to change practice patterns for pediatric fracture care must first understand the factors that influence decision-making.</p><p><strong>Key concepts: </strong>(1)The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in the adoption of BEST practices for the management of buckle fractures across all provider groups.(2)Fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons have the highest level of BEST practice adherence compared to other provider types.(3)Initiatives aimed at altering clinical practice must prioritize an understanding of the decisional factors affecting healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":520850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","volume":"11 ","pages":"100162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Based on the existing consensus in the literature, we have coined a term at our institution to describe optimal treatment for distal radius buckle fractures: Buckle Evidence-based Strategic Treatment (BEST). BEST includes a single provider visit, education, a removable wrist brace/bandage, no additional follow-up visits, and no additional X-rays. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many providers were pressured to reduce the number of in-person visits, promote physical distancing, and minimize in-person interaction with the healthcare system. It is unknown if a secondary effect of the COVID-19 pandemic was increased use of BEST practices and if there was a sustained effect. This investigation analyzed the adherence to BEST practices for treating distal radius buckle fractures in the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 era.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of buckle fracture care was conducted across 2018-2019 (pre-COVID-19) and 2020-2022 (COVID-19 era). Subset analysis was also conducted for 2020 (peak COVID-19 era) and 2021-2022 (post-peak COVID-19 era). Adherence to BEST practices was assessed by chart review. The provider type was documented and subclassified into fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, non-pediatric fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons, and non-physicians. Analyses were performed using chi-squared testing.

Results: A total of 602 distal radius buckle fractures met inclusion, with an average patient age of 9.4 years. Pre-COVID-19 BEST practice adherence was 11.15%. During peak COVID-19 era, adherence rates improved significantly to 41.18% (P < .001). This effect was sustained for the post-peak COVID-19 era. There were significantly different rates of adherence depending on provider type (P < .001).

Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant increase in BEST practice utilization for buckle fracture management across all provider types. Adherence to BEST practices varied significantly based on provider type, with pediatric fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons having the highest level of adherence. This study demonstrates that external factors can impact treatment decisions for distal radius buckle fractures. Advocacy to change practice patterns for pediatric fracture care must first understand the factors that influence decision-making.

Key concepts: (1)The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in the adoption of BEST practices for the management of buckle fractures across all provider groups.(2)Fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons have the highest level of BEST practice adherence compared to other provider types.(3)Initiatives aimed at altering clinical practice must prioritize an understanding of the decisional factors affecting healthcare providers.

Level of evidence: III.

COVID-19大流行对扣状骨折治疗的影响。
背景:基于文献中的现有共识,我们在我们的机构创造了一个术语来描述桡骨远端屈曲骨折的最佳治疗:屈曲循证策略治疗(BEST)。BEST包括单一提供者就诊、教育、可移动腕带/绷带,不需要额外随访,也不需要额外的x光检查。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,许多服务提供者被迫减少亲自就诊次数,促进保持身体距离,并尽量减少与医疗保健系统的亲自互动。目前尚不清楚COVID-19大流行的继发性影响是否为更多地采用最佳做法,以及是否存在持续影响。本研究分析了在COVID-19前和COVID-19时代治疗桡骨远端屈曲骨折的最佳做法的依从性。方法:回顾性队列研究2018-2019年(COVID-19前期)和2020-2022年(COVID-19时代)的扣式骨折护理。还对2020年(COVID-19高峰期)和2021-2022年(COVID-19高峰期后)进行了子集分析。通过图表审查来评估对最佳实践的遵守情况。提供者类型被记录并细分为研究金培训的儿科骨科医生、非儿科研究金培训的骨科医生和非内科医生。采用卡方检验进行分析。结果:602例桡骨远端屈曲骨折符合纳入条件,患者平均年龄9.4岁。covid -19前最佳实践依从性为11.15%。在COVID-19高峰时期,依从率显著提高至41.18% (P P结论:COVID-19大流行与所有类型的提供者对扣式骨折管理的最佳实践使用率显著增加有关。对最佳实践的依从性因提供者类型而有显著差异,接受过儿科奖学金培训的矫形外科医生的依从性最高。本研究表明,外部因素会影响桡骨远端屈曲骨折的治疗决策。倡导改变小儿骨折护理的实践模式必须首先了解影响决策的因素。关键概念:(1)2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行与所有医疗服务提供者群体中采用最佳实践管理扣型骨折的人数增加有关。(2)与其他医疗服务提供者类型相比,接受过奖学金培训的儿科骨科医生对最佳实践的依从性最高。(3)旨在改变临床实践的举措必须优先考虑影响医疗服务提供者的决策因素。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信