Can a New, Satellite Inpatient Hospital Maintain the Efficiency of an Ambulatory Surgery Center with No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study.

Vineet M Desai, Christopher J DeFrancesco, Morgan E Swanson, Divya Talwar, Alexandra Stevens, Nathan Chaclas, David P VanEenenaam, Kevin M Landrum, Akbar N Syed, Brendan A Williams, Theodore J Ganley
{"title":"Can a New, Satellite Inpatient Hospital Maintain the Efficiency of an Ambulatory Surgery Center with No Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study.","authors":"Vineet M Desai, Christopher J DeFrancesco, Morgan E Swanson, Divya Talwar, Alexandra Stevens, Nathan Chaclas, David P VanEenenaam, Kevin M Landrum, Akbar N Syed, Brendan A Williams, Theodore J Ganley","doi":"10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has found that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions performed at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are more time-efficient. However, recent literature investigating this phenomenon within the pediatric population is limited and primarily retrospective. The goal of this study was to prospectively compare the operating room (OR) efficiency of pediatric ACL reconstructions performed across different surgical settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adolescent patients (12-18 years) undergoing ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon were prospectively enrolled from 2020 to 2024. Patients were cohorted based on the location of their surgery at one of three sites: 1) a traditional, tertiary care academic hospital, 2) hospital-owned ASCs, or 3) a satellite inpatient hospital that was built and connected to an ASC in January 2022. Patient preoperative, surgical, and postoperative data were collected, and surgical efficiency was compared across surgical sites using a variety of metrics. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were collected using the Pedi-FABS and Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 115 patients (56.5% female, mean age: 15.4 ​± ​1.7 years) met inclusion criteria and were enrolled. Thirty-one patients (27.0%) had ACL reconstructions at the main inpatient hospital, 36 (31.3%) at hospital-owned ASCs, and 48 (41.7%) at the new satellite inpatient hospital. When controlling for concomitant procedures, regional anesthesia type, and staff, there was a significant difference in total OR in-room, anesthesia induction, surgery preparation, surgery duration, and dressing application/wake-up times among the three cohorts (<i>P</i> ​< ​.001). Both the ASCs and the satellite inpatient hospital had shorter total OR in-room and surgery duration times than the main inpatient hospital (<i>P</i> ​< ​.001). There were no differences in PROMs among the three cohorts (<i>P</i> ​> ​.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adolescent ACL reconstructions performed at either an ASC or a satellite inpatient hospital were more time-efficient than those performed at a traditional, main inpatient hospital, with no differences in PROMs. Institutions should consider implementing strategies used at ASCs, such as standardized surgical teams, at main hospitals to increase efficiency.</p><p><strong>Key concepts: </strong>(1)A satellite inpatient hospital and ambulatory surgery centers are more time-efficient for adolescent ACL reconstruction than a main, inpatient hospital.(2)There were no differences in patient-reported functional outcomes after adolescent ACL reconstruction among ASCs, a main inpatient hospital, and a satellite inpatient hospital.(3)A satellite inpatient hospital can be as efficient as an ASC, with no significant difference in quality.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>II (Prospective Cohort Study).</p>","PeriodicalId":520850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","volume":"9 ","pages":"100120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research has found that anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions performed at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) are more time-efficient. However, recent literature investigating this phenomenon within the pediatric population is limited and primarily retrospective. The goal of this study was to prospectively compare the operating room (OR) efficiency of pediatric ACL reconstructions performed across different surgical settings.

Methods: Adolescent patients (12-18 years) undergoing ACL reconstruction by a single surgeon were prospectively enrolled from 2020 to 2024. Patients were cohorted based on the location of their surgery at one of three sites: 1) a traditional, tertiary care academic hospital, 2) hospital-owned ASCs, or 3) a satellite inpatient hospital that was built and connected to an ASC in January 2022. Patient preoperative, surgical, and postoperative data were collected, and surgical efficiency was compared across surgical sites using a variety of metrics. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were collected using the Pedi-FABS and Pediatric International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaires.

Results: A total of 115 patients (56.5% female, mean age: 15.4 ​± ​1.7 years) met inclusion criteria and were enrolled. Thirty-one patients (27.0%) had ACL reconstructions at the main inpatient hospital, 36 (31.3%) at hospital-owned ASCs, and 48 (41.7%) at the new satellite inpatient hospital. When controlling for concomitant procedures, regional anesthesia type, and staff, there was a significant difference in total OR in-room, anesthesia induction, surgery preparation, surgery duration, and dressing application/wake-up times among the three cohorts (P ​< ​.001). Both the ASCs and the satellite inpatient hospital had shorter total OR in-room and surgery duration times than the main inpatient hospital (P ​< ​.001). There were no differences in PROMs among the three cohorts (P ​> ​.05).

Conclusions: Adolescent ACL reconstructions performed at either an ASC or a satellite inpatient hospital were more time-efficient than those performed at a traditional, main inpatient hospital, with no differences in PROMs. Institutions should consider implementing strategies used at ASCs, such as standardized surgical teams, at main hospitals to increase efficiency.

Key concepts: (1)A satellite inpatient hospital and ambulatory surgery centers are more time-efficient for adolescent ACL reconstruction than a main, inpatient hospital.(2)There were no differences in patient-reported functional outcomes after adolescent ACL reconstruction among ASCs, a main inpatient hospital, and a satellite inpatient hospital.(3)A satellite inpatient hospital can be as efficient as an ASC, with no significant difference in quality.

Level of evidence: II (Prospective Cohort Study).

一个新的卫星住院医院能否在病人报告的结果没有差异的情况下保持门诊手术中心的效率?前瞻性研究。
背景:先前的研究发现,在门诊手术中心(ASCs)进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建更省时。然而,最近在儿科人群中调查这一现象的文献是有限的,主要是回顾性的。本研究的目的是前瞻性地比较不同手术环境下儿童ACL重建的手术室(OR)效率。方法:从2020年到2024年,前瞻性纳入由单一外科医生进行ACL重建的青少年患者(12-18岁)。患者根据其手术地点在以下三个地点之一进行分组:1)传统的三级保健学术医院,2)医院拥有的ASC,或3)2022年1月建成并与ASC连接的卫星住院医院。收集患者术前、手术和术后数据,并使用各种指标比较手术部位的手术效率。采用Pedi-FABS和儿科国际膝关节文献委员会问卷收集患者报告的结果(PROMs)。结果:115例患者符合纳入标准,其中女性占56.5%,平均年龄15.4±1.7岁。31例(27.0%)患者在主要住院医院进行ACL重建,36例(31.3%)在医院所属ASCs, 48例(41.7%)在新的卫星住院医院进行ACL重建。在控制伴随手术、区域麻醉类型和工作人员的情况下,三个队列在总手术室、麻醉诱导、手术准备、手术持续时间和敷料应用/唤醒次数方面存在显著差异(P P P >.05)。结论:在ASC或附属住院医院进行的青少年ACL重建比在传统的主要住院医院进行的青少年ACL重建更省时,并且在PROMs方面没有差异。各机构应考虑在主要医院实施ASCs采用的策略,如标准化外科团队,以提高效率。关键概念:(1)卫星住院医院和门诊手术中心对青少年ACL重建的时间效率比主要住院医院高(2)青少年ACL重建后患者报告的功能结果在ASCs、主要住院医院和卫星住院医院之间没有差异。(3)卫星住院医院可以和ASC一样高效,但质量没有显著差异。证据等级:II(前瞻性队列研究)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信