Effectiveness of various cast covers in the pediatric population.

Amit Parekh, John Moon, David Roberts, Verena M Schreiber
{"title":"Effectiveness of various cast covers in the pediatric population.","authors":"Amit Parekh, John Moon, David Roberts, Verena M Schreiber","doi":"10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Keeping casts dry is a challenge in pediatric Orthopaedics. A wet cast risks skin complications and generally requires a cast change resulting in unplanned visits and increased health care costs in patients undergoing cast immobilization. Previous research on the effectiveness of cast covers has only reviewed adult models. We evaluated the efficacy of different commercially available cast covers and do-it-yourself (DIY) methods for keeping casts dry in different-sized pediatric arm models and compared the relative costs of using each method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Short arm casts were applied to plastic mannequin arms representing pediatric patients ages 3, 6, and 12 years old. Different cast covers or DIY methods were applied over each cast and the limbs were then submerged in water for 1 minute. Water absorption was calculated by comparing the mass before and after submersion as measured with a digital scale. Each test group had 6 trials as determined by a power analysis. Statistical analysis was done using a nonparametric test with additional post-hoc analysis. Cost-effectiveness was estimated for typical materials needed for use over a 6-week period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A plastic bag and duct tape were the most effective in keeping a cast dry. Other DIY methods (plastic bag and rubber bands, adhesive film) were not effective. There were several highly effective commercial cast covers across age groups, including Bloccs, Seal-Tight, and DryPro. Other commercial cast covers tested had inferior performance. Of the effective methods, a single plastic bag and duct tape were the most cost-effective.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusions: </strong>A plastic bag and duct tape was overall the most clinically and cost-effective method of avoiding a wet cast, with good to excellent results across arm size/age groups. Findings from this study may better inform patients about ways to keep casts dry, avoid unnecessary visits for cast changes, and decrease associated costs and risk of complications.</p><p><strong>Key concepts: </strong>(1)A plastic bag and duct tape were the most effective methods for keeping a cast dry across various arm sizes seen in pediatric Orthopaedics.(2)Other DIY methods (plastic bags and rubber bands, adhesive film) were ineffective, and should not be recommended.(3)Performance of commercial cast covers was variable. Several commercial cast covers (Bloccs, Seal-Tight, DryPro) were effective, but others (Walgreens, Curad) were not.(4)Amongst effective methods, a plastic bag and duct tape were also the least expensive.<i>Level of Evidence:</i> II, <i>prospective comparative study.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":520850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","volume":"7 ","pages":"100028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088347/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jposna.2024.100028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Keeping casts dry is a challenge in pediatric Orthopaedics. A wet cast risks skin complications and generally requires a cast change resulting in unplanned visits and increased health care costs in patients undergoing cast immobilization. Previous research on the effectiveness of cast covers has only reviewed adult models. We evaluated the efficacy of different commercially available cast covers and do-it-yourself (DIY) methods for keeping casts dry in different-sized pediatric arm models and compared the relative costs of using each method.

Methods: Short arm casts were applied to plastic mannequin arms representing pediatric patients ages 3, 6, and 12 years old. Different cast covers or DIY methods were applied over each cast and the limbs were then submerged in water for 1 minute. Water absorption was calculated by comparing the mass before and after submersion as measured with a digital scale. Each test group had 6 trials as determined by a power analysis. Statistical analysis was done using a nonparametric test with additional post-hoc analysis. Cost-effectiveness was estimated for typical materials needed for use over a 6-week period.

Results: A plastic bag and duct tape were the most effective in keeping a cast dry. Other DIY methods (plastic bag and rubber bands, adhesive film) were not effective. There were several highly effective commercial cast covers across age groups, including Bloccs, Seal-Tight, and DryPro. Other commercial cast covers tested had inferior performance. Of the effective methods, a single plastic bag and duct tape were the most cost-effective.

Discussion/conclusions: A plastic bag and duct tape was overall the most clinically and cost-effective method of avoiding a wet cast, with good to excellent results across arm size/age groups. Findings from this study may better inform patients about ways to keep casts dry, avoid unnecessary visits for cast changes, and decrease associated costs and risk of complications.

Key concepts: (1)A plastic bag and duct tape were the most effective methods for keeping a cast dry across various arm sizes seen in pediatric Orthopaedics.(2)Other DIY methods (plastic bags and rubber bands, adhesive film) were ineffective, and should not be recommended.(3)Performance of commercial cast covers was variable. Several commercial cast covers (Bloccs, Seal-Tight, DryPro) were effective, but others (Walgreens, Curad) were not.(4)Amongst effective methods, a plastic bag and duct tape were also the least expensive.Level of Evidence: II, prospective comparative study.

各种石膏盖在儿科人群中的有效性。
背景:保持石膏干燥是儿科骨科的一个挑战。湿石膏有皮肤并发症的风险,通常需要更换石膏,导致计划外的就诊,并增加了进行石膏固定的患者的医疗费用。以前对石膏罩有效性的研究只回顾了成人模型。我们评估了不同的市售石膏盖和DIY方法在不同大小的儿童手臂模型中保持石膏干燥的功效,并比较了使用每种方法的相对成本。方法:将短臂模型应用于3、6、12岁儿童的塑料假臂上。在每个模型上应用不同的石膏套或DIY方法,然后将四肢浸入水中1分钟。通过比较浸没前和浸没后用数字标度测量的质量来计算吸水率。根据功效分析,每个试验组进行6次试验。统计分析采用非参数检验和额外的事后分析。估计了6周期间所需的典型材料的成本效益。结果:塑料袋和管道胶带是保持石膏干燥最有效的方法。其他DIY方法(塑料袋和橡皮筋,胶膜)都没有效果。有几个非常有效的商业石膏盖跨年龄组,包括块,密封紧,和DryPro。经测试的其他商业铸盖性能较差。在有效的方法中,单个塑料袋和管道胶带是最具成本效益的。讨论/结论:总的来说,塑料袋和管道胶带是避免湿石膏的最临床和最具成本效益的方法,在手臂大小/年龄组中都有良好到极好的效果。本研究的发现可能会更好地告知患者保持石膏干燥的方法,避免不必要的石膏更换就诊,并降低相关费用和并发症的风险。关键概念:(1)在小儿骨科中,塑料袋和管道胶带是保持不同手臂尺寸的石膏干燥最有效的方法。(2)其他DIY方法(塑料袋和橡皮筋,胶膜)效果不佳,不应推荐。(3)商业石膏盖的性能各不相同。几种商业石膏盖(Bloccs, Seal-Tight, DryPro)是有效的,但其他(Walgreens, Curad)不是。(4)在有效的方法中,塑料袋和管道胶带也是最便宜的。证据等级:II,前瞻性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信