Are Routine Post-Cast Removal Radiographs and a Second Follow-up Appointment Necessary in the Management of Nondisplaced or Minimally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures?

Brian Molokwu, Fareeda Eraky, Matthew Weintraub, Ian Briggs, Candice Legister, Katie Otero, Neil Kaushal, Alice Chu, Folorunsho Edobor-Osula
{"title":"Are Routine Post-Cast Removal Radiographs and a Second Follow-up Appointment Necessary in the Management of Nondisplaced or Minimally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures?","authors":"Brian Molokwu, Fareeda Eraky, Matthew Weintraub, Ian Briggs, Candice Legister, Katie Otero, Neil Kaushal, Alice Chu, Folorunsho Edobor-Osula","doi":"10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of routine follow-up radiographs and appointments after cast removal when managing minimally displaced pediatric distal radius fractures has not been conclusively proven. This study aims to assess how often follow-up appointments and radiographs taken after cast removal alter management of patients with minimally displaced distal radius fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted on patients under 18 years of age with minimally displaced distal radius fractures between 2017 and 2023. Demographic information, fracture characteristics, time to follow-up, and each appointment outcome were recorded. A change in patient management following post-cast removal radiographs was defined as a need for closed reduction, operative intervention, or prolonged immobilization. The second follow-up appointment was considered to modify management if it necessitated a physical therapy referral or an additional office visit. Unscheduled appointments and any changes in fracture alignment during follow-up visits were also noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three patients met the inclusion criteria; 1.1% (1 of 93) of patients had their management changed following their post-cast removal radiographs according to our criteria. One patient was indicated for prolonged immobilization for a visible fracture line; no patients were indicated for surgery or closed reduction. Thirty-eight patients who underwent cast removal attended their 2nd follow-up appointment; 2.6% (1 of 38) of patients had their management changed according to our criteria. One patient required an additional follow-up appointment for a physeal check; no patient required a physical therapy referral. Two patients had an unscheduled appointment after discharge of care, due to parental desire of recovery confirmation before returning to gym play. No changes in fracture alignment were observed during any follow-up radiographs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that post-cast removal radiographs and second follow-up appointments rarely alter management of minimally displaced distal radius fractures. Limiting unnecessary visits and imaging could reduce costs and ease the burden on patients and families.</p><p><strong>Key concepts: </strong>1) Post-cast removal radiographs rarely altered management for minimally displaced pediatric distal radius fractures.2) Only 1.1% of patients required prolonged immobilization, with no cases needing surgery or closed reduction.3) Second follow-up appointments infrequently changed management, with only 2.6% of patients requiring an additional visit.4) Unscheduled visits were primarily driven by parental concerns rather than clinical necessity.5) No changes in fracture alignment were observed in any follow-up radiographs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV - case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":520850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","volume":"11 ","pages":"100170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jposna.2025.100170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of routine follow-up radiographs and appointments after cast removal when managing minimally displaced pediatric distal radius fractures has not been conclusively proven. This study aims to assess how often follow-up appointments and radiographs taken after cast removal alter management of patients with minimally displaced distal radius fractures.

Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted on patients under 18 years of age with minimally displaced distal radius fractures between 2017 and 2023. Demographic information, fracture characteristics, time to follow-up, and each appointment outcome were recorded. A change in patient management following post-cast removal radiographs was defined as a need for closed reduction, operative intervention, or prolonged immobilization. The second follow-up appointment was considered to modify management if it necessitated a physical therapy referral or an additional office visit. Unscheduled appointments and any changes in fracture alignment during follow-up visits were also noted.

Results: Ninety-three patients met the inclusion criteria; 1.1% (1 of 93) of patients had their management changed following their post-cast removal radiographs according to our criteria. One patient was indicated for prolonged immobilization for a visible fracture line; no patients were indicated for surgery or closed reduction. Thirty-eight patients who underwent cast removal attended their 2nd follow-up appointment; 2.6% (1 of 38) of patients had their management changed according to our criteria. One patient required an additional follow-up appointment for a physeal check; no patient required a physical therapy referral. Two patients had an unscheduled appointment after discharge of care, due to parental desire of recovery confirmation before returning to gym play. No changes in fracture alignment were observed during any follow-up radiographs.

Conclusions: This study suggests that post-cast removal radiographs and second follow-up appointments rarely alter management of minimally displaced distal radius fractures. Limiting unnecessary visits and imaging could reduce costs and ease the burden on patients and families.

Key concepts: 1) Post-cast removal radiographs rarely altered management for minimally displaced pediatric distal radius fractures.2) Only 1.1% of patients required prolonged immobilization, with no cases needing surgery or closed reduction.3) Second follow-up appointments infrequently changed management, with only 2.6% of patients requiring an additional visit.4) Unscheduled visits were primarily driven by parental concerns rather than clinical necessity.5) No changes in fracture alignment were observed in any follow-up radiographs.

Level of evidence: Level IV - case series.

对于非移位或轻度移位的桡骨远端骨折,常规的石膏拆除后x线片和第二次随访是否必要?
背景:常规随访x线片和石膏拆除后预约治疗儿童桡骨远端骨折的有效性尚未得到最终证实。本研究旨在评估在取出石膏后随访和x线片拍摄的频率如何改变微创桡骨远端骨折患者的治疗。方法:对2017 - 2023年18岁以下桡骨远端轻度移位骨折患者进行单中心回顾性分析。记录人口统计信息、骨折特征、随访时间和每次预约结果。脱模后x线片对患者管理的改变被定义为需要闭合复位、手术干预或长时间固定。第二次随访预约被认为是修改管理,如果它需要一个物理治疗转诊或额外的办公室访问。在随访期间,未安排的预约和骨折对齐的任何变化也被记录下来。结果:93例患者符合纳入标准;根据我们的标准,1.1%(93人中有1人)的患者在脱模后x线片检查后管理发生了变化。1例患者因可见骨折线需要长时间固定;没有患者需要手术或闭合复位。38例患者接受了第二次随访;2.6%(1 / 38)的患者根据我们的标准改变了他们的管理。一名患者需要额外的随访预约进行体格检查;没有病人需要物理治疗转诊。2例患者出院后因父母希望确认康复后再回健身房玩耍,有计划外预约。在任何随访x线片中均未观察到骨折排列的变化。结论:本研究表明,石膏拆除后的x线片和第二次随访预约很少改变微创移位桡骨远端骨折的治疗。限制不必要的访问和成像可以降低成本,减轻患者和家属的负担。关键概念:1)微创移位儿童桡骨远端骨折的脱模后x线片很少改变处理方法2)只有1.1%的患者需要长时间固定,没有病例需要手术或闭合复位3)第二次随访很少改变处理方法。只有2.6%的患者需要额外的检查。4)计划外的检查主要是出于父母的考虑,而不是临床需要。5)在任何随访的x线片中均未观察到骨折排列的变化。证据等级:第四级:案件系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信