Health status of adults exposed to severe acute malnutrition during childhood in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo: the Lwiro cohort study.

BMJ public health Pub Date : 2025-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjph-2024-001510
Christian Chiribagula, Ghislain Bisimwa, Michel P Hermans, Michele Dramaix, Samuel Makali, Gaylord Ngaboyeka, Christine Chimanuka, Corneille Lembebu, Rosine Bigirinama, Jonathan C Wells, Pacifique Mwene-Batu
{"title":"Health status of adults exposed to severe acute malnutrition during childhood in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo: the Lwiro cohort study.","authors":"Christian Chiribagula, Ghislain Bisimwa, Michel P Hermans, Michele Dramaix, Samuel Makali, Gaylord Ngaboyeka, Christine Chimanuka, Corneille Lembebu, Rosine Bigirinama, Jonathan C Wells, Pacifique Mwene-Batu","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2024-001510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While most studies of adults with a history of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) focused on survival and long-term non-communicable diseases, few studies have examined community health. The aim of this study was to compare the overall health status and its predictors between adults with a history of SAM and healthy controls in the context of Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 257 adults in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo who were treated for SAM during childhood between 1988 and 2007. They were compared with 187 age-matched and sex-matched control adults living in the same community who had not been exposed to malnutrition as a child. The main outcome was the WHODAS summary score, measuring an individual's health status in six domains of disability (household daily tasks, cognitive, mobility, self-care, social networks and social participation). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the predictors of health status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the participants in both groups was 20 years. The median (P25-P75) WHODAS score in SAM+ participants was 25.0 (14.6-33.3), whereas it was 8.3 (4.2-14.6) in SAM- participants (p<0.001). In five of the six disability domains (except individual self-care), SAM+ participants had significantly higher scores (poorer health) than SAM- participants. Consequently, 63% of SAM+ participants had a higher level of dependency compared with 16.6% of SAM- participants. Finally, being SAM+ was predictive of a higher WHODAS score (OR 8.6, 95% CI 5.4 to 13.6, p=0.002). In the multivariable logistic regression model, occupation, socioeconomic status and use of social networks, introduced separately in addition to SAM, remained significant but had no confounding effect on the association between SAM and WHODAS score.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAM during childhood has deleterious consequences on the state of health during adulthood. It is imperative to implement interventions to prevent and treat SAM during childhood to maximise adult population health.</p>","PeriodicalId":101362,"journal":{"name":"BMJ public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"e001510"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While most studies of adults with a history of severe acute malnutrition (SAM) focused on survival and long-term non-communicable diseases, few studies have examined community health. The aim of this study was to compare the overall health status and its predictors between adults with a history of SAM and healthy controls in the context of Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS).

Methods: We evaluated 257 adults in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo who were treated for SAM during childhood between 1988 and 2007. They were compared with 187 age-matched and sex-matched control adults living in the same community who had not been exposed to malnutrition as a child. The main outcome was the WHODAS summary score, measuring an individual's health status in six domains of disability (household daily tasks, cognitive, mobility, self-care, social networks and social participation). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify the predictors of health status.

Results: The median age of the participants in both groups was 20 years. The median (P25-P75) WHODAS score in SAM+ participants was 25.0 (14.6-33.3), whereas it was 8.3 (4.2-14.6) in SAM- participants (p<0.001). In five of the six disability domains (except individual self-care), SAM+ participants had significantly higher scores (poorer health) than SAM- participants. Consequently, 63% of SAM+ participants had a higher level of dependency compared with 16.6% of SAM- participants. Finally, being SAM+ was predictive of a higher WHODAS score (OR 8.6, 95% CI 5.4 to 13.6, p=0.002). In the multivariable logistic regression model, occupation, socioeconomic status and use of social networks, introduced separately in addition to SAM, remained significant but had no confounding effect on the association between SAM and WHODAS score.

Conclusion: SAM during childhood has deleterious consequences on the state of health during adulthood. It is imperative to implement interventions to prevent and treat SAM during childhood to maximise adult population health.

刚果民主共和国东部儿童时期严重急性营养不良的成年人的健康状况:Lwiro队列研究
背景:虽然大多数对有严重急性营养不良史的成年人的研究侧重于生存和长期非传染性疾病,但很少有研究对社区健康进行调查。本研究的目的是利用世卫组织残疾评估表(WHODAS)比较刚果民主共和国东部有SAM病史的成年人和健康对照者的整体健康状况及其预测因素。方法:我们评估了1988年至2007年期间在刚果民主共和国东部接受过SAM治疗的257名成年人。他们与生活在同一社区的187名年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行了比较,这些对照组在儿童时期没有遭受过营养不良的影响。主要结果是WHODAS总结得分,衡量个人在六个残疾领域(家庭日常任务、认知、行动能力、自我保健、社会网络和社会参与)的健康状况。采用多变量logistic回归模型确定健康状况的预测因子。结果:两组患者的中位年龄均为20岁。SAM+参与者的WHODAS评分中位数(P25-P75)为25.0(14.6-33.3),而SAM-参与者的WHODAS评分中位数为8.3 (4.2-14.6)(p结论:童年时期的SAM对成年期的健康状况有有害影响。必须实施干预措施,在儿童时期预防和治疗SAM,以最大限度地提高成年人的健康水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信