Implementing and documenting cultural adaption of evidence-based practice strategies to reduce opioid overdose deaths: examples and lessons from the HEALing communities study.

Discover public health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-25 DOI:10.1186/s12982-025-00696-2
Erin B Gibson, LaShawn Glasgow, Monica Nouvong, Margaret McGladrey, Darcy Freedman, Deborah Chassler, Rachel Vickers-Smith, Madeline D'Onfro, Dawn A Goddard-Eckrich, Timothy Hunt, Avik Chatterjee, JaNae Holloway, Katie Fain, Rachel Sword Cruz, Linda Sprague Martinez
{"title":"Implementing and documenting cultural adaption of evidence-based practice strategies to reduce opioid overdose deaths: examples and lessons from the HEALing communities study.","authors":"Erin B Gibson, LaShawn Glasgow, Monica Nouvong, Margaret McGladrey, Darcy Freedman, Deborah Chassler, Rachel Vickers-Smith, Madeline D'Onfro, Dawn A Goddard-Eckrich, Timothy Hunt, Avik Chatterjee, JaNae Holloway, Katie Fain, Rachel Sword Cruz, Linda Sprague Martinez","doi":"10.1186/s12982-025-00696-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Addressing the opioid overdose crisis requires developing contextually specific strategies promoting the adoption of evidence-based practices (EBPs) to prevent and treat opioid use disorder (OUD), including overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) and medications for OUD (MOUD). To effectively reach the groups most affected by the opioid crisis, EBP strategies must be adjusted to fit the culture and contexts of different communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The HEALing Communities Study engaged coalitions in 67 communities across four states to select and implement EBP strategies to reduce opioid overdose mortality. Coalitions were encouraged to culturally adapt EBP strategies for \"special populations,\" which were defined as groups that are highly impacted by OUD and face unique challenges in accessing prevention and treatment services. EBP strategies, and any efforts to culturally adapt them, were documented in coalition action plans. We collected quantitative and qualitative details from coalitions' action plans. Following the first wave of the intervention (January 2020 - June 2022), we utilized the DATA (Describe, Analyze, Theorize, and ACT) model to evaluate the HEALing Communities Study approach to reaching special populations and identify areas for improvement. Finally, we identified variations across states in how cultural adaptation was interpreted and implemented. We provide strategies to improve how cultural adaption strategies are developed, documented, implemented, and monitored in future studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Coalitions selected and implemented a variety of culturally tailored EBP strategies. However, complete understanding of the nature and effectiveness of cultural adaptation was limited by varying interpretations of what counts as cultural adaptation, inconsistent use of reporting guidance across research sites, and lack of data on the reach of each EBP strategy. Examples of cultural adaptation that successfully reached special populations included locating EBP strategies near each other to reduce transportation barriers, funding community-based organizations to help unhoused individuals meet basic needs, and hiring a bilingual and bicultural workforce to support prevention and treatment for OUD. Future studies should improve reporting of intersectional identities, measure EBP strategies' reach, utilize real-world evidence of successful implementation strategies for cultural adaptation, and incorporate qualitative methods to contextualize cultural adaptation at local levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We call on funders, researchers, evaluators, and implementers to invest in training and technical assistance, robust documentation and monitoring protocols, and thoughtful community engagement to support cultural adaptation of EBP strategies to reduce overdose for the most vulnerable populations.<i>Trial registration</i>: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939. Date of registration 10/01/2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":520283,"journal":{"name":"Discover public health","volume":"22 1","pages":"296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12104109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-025-00696-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Addressing the opioid overdose crisis requires developing contextually specific strategies promoting the adoption of evidence-based practices (EBPs) to prevent and treat opioid use disorder (OUD), including overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) and medications for OUD (MOUD). To effectively reach the groups most affected by the opioid crisis, EBP strategies must be adjusted to fit the culture and contexts of different communities.

Methods: The HEALing Communities Study engaged coalitions in 67 communities across four states to select and implement EBP strategies to reduce opioid overdose mortality. Coalitions were encouraged to culturally adapt EBP strategies for "special populations," which were defined as groups that are highly impacted by OUD and face unique challenges in accessing prevention and treatment services. EBP strategies, and any efforts to culturally adapt them, were documented in coalition action plans. We collected quantitative and qualitative details from coalitions' action plans. Following the first wave of the intervention (January 2020 - June 2022), we utilized the DATA (Describe, Analyze, Theorize, and ACT) model to evaluate the HEALing Communities Study approach to reaching special populations and identify areas for improvement. Finally, we identified variations across states in how cultural adaptation was interpreted and implemented. We provide strategies to improve how cultural adaption strategies are developed, documented, implemented, and monitored in future studies.

Results: Coalitions selected and implemented a variety of culturally tailored EBP strategies. However, complete understanding of the nature and effectiveness of cultural adaptation was limited by varying interpretations of what counts as cultural adaptation, inconsistent use of reporting guidance across research sites, and lack of data on the reach of each EBP strategy. Examples of cultural adaptation that successfully reached special populations included locating EBP strategies near each other to reduce transportation barriers, funding community-based organizations to help unhoused individuals meet basic needs, and hiring a bilingual and bicultural workforce to support prevention and treatment for OUD. Future studies should improve reporting of intersectional identities, measure EBP strategies' reach, utilize real-world evidence of successful implementation strategies for cultural adaptation, and incorporate qualitative methods to contextualize cultural adaptation at local levels.

Conclusion: We call on funders, researchers, evaluators, and implementers to invest in training and technical assistance, robust documentation and monitoring protocols, and thoughtful community engagement to support cultural adaptation of EBP strategies to reduce overdose for the most vulnerable populations.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939. Date of registration 10/01/2019.

实施和记录以证据为基础的实践战略的文化适应,以减少阿片类药物过量死亡:来自愈合社区研究的例子和教训。
导论:解决阿片类药物过量危机需要制定具体的战略,促进采用循证实践(ebp)来预防和治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD),包括过量教育和纳洛酮分发(OEND)以及OUD药物治疗(mod)。为了有效地接触到受阿片类药物危机影响最严重的群体,必须调整EBP战略,以适应不同社区的文化和背景。方法:康复社区研究涉及四个州67个社区的联盟,以选择和实施EBP策略来降低阿片类药物过量死亡率。鼓励联盟在文化上适应“特殊人群”的EBP战略,这些人群被定义为受OUD影响严重、在获得预防和治疗服务方面面临独特挑战的群体。EBP战略,以及任何在文化上适应它们的努力,都被记录在联盟行动计划中。我们从联盟的行动计划中收集了定量和定性的细节。在第一波干预(2020年1月至2022年6月)之后,我们利用DATA(描述、分析、理论化和ACT)模型来评估治疗社区研究方法,以达到特殊人群并确定需要改进的领域。最后,我们确定了各州在如何解释和实施文化适应方面的差异。我们提供了在未来的研究中如何改进文化适应策略的制定、记录、实施和监测的策略。结果:联盟选择并实施了多种文化定制的EBP策略。然而,对文化适应的性质和有效性的全面理解受到文化适应的不同解释、不同研究地点报告指南的不一致使用以及缺乏关于每种EBP策略范围的数据的限制。文化适应在特殊人群中取得成功的例子包括:将EBP战略相互靠近,以减少交通障碍;资助社区组织,帮助无家可归的人满足基本需求;雇用双语和双文化的工作人员,以支持OUD的预防和治疗。未来的研究应改进交叉身份的报告,测量EBP策略的影响范围,利用成功实施文化适应策略的现实证据,并结合定性方法在地方层面上对文化适应进行语境化。结论:我们呼吁资助者、研究人员、评估人员和实施者在培训和技术援助、健全的文件和监测协议以及周到的社区参与方面进行投资,以支持EBP战略的文化适应,以减少最弱势群体的过量用药。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04111939。注册日期2019年10月1日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信