The HARMONY trial: assessing general practitioner knowledge, attitudes and confidence following culturally safe domestic violence and abuse training.

IF 1.3
Molly Allen-Leap, Angela Taft, Felicity Young, Leesa Hooker, Kelsey Hegarty
{"title":"The HARMONY trial: assessing general practitioner knowledge, attitudes and confidence following culturally safe domestic violence and abuse training.","authors":"Molly Allen-Leap, Angela Taft, Felicity Young, Leesa Hooker, Kelsey Hegarty","doi":"10.1071/PY24210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Domestic violence and abuse (DVA) impacts all communities, including migrant/refugee populations. Although general practitioners (GPs) are often a first point of contact for victim-survivors, most lack training in culturally safe responses to DVA. Methods We evaluated culturally safe DVA training (HARMONY), co-delivered by a GP educator and bilingual South Asian DVA advocate, to general practice clinics in Victoria, Australia. The program included clinical audits, case studies, simulated migrant/refugee patients and lived experience videos. Pre- and post-training surveys assessed practitioners' attitudes, understanding and confidence in responding to DVA. Results Twenty-three of 43 practitioners (53.5%) completed both surveys. Pre-training, 10 practitioners (43.5%) felt confident asking about violence when they thought it might be culturally accepted, and eight (34.8%) were confident locating support resources. Post-training, most practitioners (82.6%) reported increased confidence and communication skills. The training met learning needs for 19 of 23 (82.6%) participants, with 17 of 23 (73.9%) participants reporting greater understanding of cultural safety and South Asian patients' needs. Practitioners particularly valued the advocate educator's involvement, with 17 of 23 (73.9%) finding this 'quite useful' (n =4) or 'very useful' (n =13). Conclusion Although DVA training often improves knowledge and confidence, and may not change clinical behaviour or patient outcomes, embedding cultural safety in such training remains important in responding effectively to the specific needs of ethnically diverse patients and their families experiencing DVA. The HARMONY program demonstrates potential benefits of combining clinical expertise with cultural advocacy, although further research is needed to evaluate its impact on practice and patient care among other minoritised patient communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Domestic violence and abuse (DVA) impacts all communities, including migrant/refugee populations. Although general practitioners (GPs) are often a first point of contact for victim-survivors, most lack training in culturally safe responses to DVA. Methods We evaluated culturally safe DVA training (HARMONY), co-delivered by a GP educator and bilingual South Asian DVA advocate, to general practice clinics in Victoria, Australia. The program included clinical audits, case studies, simulated migrant/refugee patients and lived experience videos. Pre- and post-training surveys assessed practitioners' attitudes, understanding and confidence in responding to DVA. Results Twenty-three of 43 practitioners (53.5%) completed both surveys. Pre-training, 10 practitioners (43.5%) felt confident asking about violence when they thought it might be culturally accepted, and eight (34.8%) were confident locating support resources. Post-training, most practitioners (82.6%) reported increased confidence and communication skills. The training met learning needs for 19 of 23 (82.6%) participants, with 17 of 23 (73.9%) participants reporting greater understanding of cultural safety and South Asian patients' needs. Practitioners particularly valued the advocate educator's involvement, with 17 of 23 (73.9%) finding this 'quite useful' (n =4) or 'very useful' (n =13). Conclusion Although DVA training often improves knowledge and confidence, and may not change clinical behaviour or patient outcomes, embedding cultural safety in such training remains important in responding effectively to the specific needs of ethnically diverse patients and their families experiencing DVA. The HARMONY program demonstrates potential benefits of combining clinical expertise with cultural advocacy, although further research is needed to evaluate its impact on practice and patient care among other minoritised patient communities.

HARMONY试验:评估全科医生在文化上安全的家庭暴力和虐待培训后的知识、态度和信心。
家庭暴力和虐待(DVA)影响所有社区,包括移民/难民人口。虽然全科医生(全科医生)通常是受害者-幸存者的第一个接触点,但大多数人缺乏文化安全应对DVA的培训。方法我们评估了文化上安全的DVA培训(HARMONY),由全科医生教育者和双语南亚DVA倡导者共同提供,在澳大利亚维多利亚州的全科诊所。该项目包括临床审计、案例研究、模拟移民/难民患者和生活体验视频。培训前和培训后的调查评估了从业人员对DVA的态度、理解和信心。结果43名执业医师中有23人(53.5%)完成了两项调查。在培训前,10名从业人员(43.5%)在认为暴力可能被文化接受的情况下有信心询问暴力问题,8名从业人员(34.8%)有信心找到支持资源。培训后,大多数从业人员(82.6%)表示信心和沟通技巧有所提高。培训满足了23名参与者中的19名(82.6%)的学习需求,23名参与者中有17名(73.9%)表示对文化安全和南亚患者的需求有了更深入的了解。从业者特别重视倡导教育者的参与,23人中有17人(73.9%)认为这“非常有用”(n =4)或“非常有用”(n =13)。结论:尽管DVA培训通常可以提高知识和信心,并且可能不会改变临床行为或患者结果,但在此类培训中嵌入文化安全对于有效响应经历DVA的不同种族患者及其家庭的特定需求仍然很重要。HARMONY项目展示了将临床专业知识与文化倡导相结合的潜在好处,尽管还需要进一步的研究来评估它对其他少数群体患者群体的实践和患者护理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信