Comparative evaluation of accuracy, precision, and radiation dose between mindways and low-dose iCare QCT for lumbar spine BMD using the European spine phantom.

IF 2.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Frontiers in medical technology Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2025.1575553
Yujie Li, Tiantian Yin, Qiushi Yang, Heli Han, Zeguo Wang, Wanjiang Yu
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of accuracy, precision, and radiation dose between mindways and low-dose iCare QCT for lumbar spine BMD using the European spine phantom.","authors":"Yujie Li, Tiantian Yin, Qiushi Yang, Heli Han, Zeguo Wang, Wanjiang Yu","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2025.1575553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has received growing attention for its utility in bone mineral density (BMD) assessment and osteoporosis diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the accuracy and precision of lumbar spine BMD measurements obtained using low-dose iCare QCT, based on the European Spine Phantom (ESP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired <i>t</i>-test was employed to compare BMD values measured under normal-dose and low-dose scan protocols using Mindways and iCare QCT systems. Accuracy was evaluated using relative measurement error (RME), and precision was assessed via relative standard deviation (RSD). Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were used to examine measurement correlation and agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For Mindways QCT, RMEs of L1-L3 were 11.89%, 6.94%, and 6.72% under normal-dose, and 6.65%, 10.5%, and 6.31% under low-dose, respectively. For iCare QCT, RMEs were 1.21%, 4.28%, and 8.88% under normal-dose, and 2.14%, 4.96%, and 8.59% under low-dose, respectively. RSDs of L1-L3 for Mindways QCT were 5.16%, 2.85%, and 0.47% under normal-dose, and 9.08%, 4.69%, and 0.49% under low-dose, respectively. For iCare QCT, RSDs were 1.11%, 0.81%, and 0.45% under normal-dose, and 2.34%, 0.85%, and 0.33% under low-dose, respectively. The radiation dose in the low-dose protocol was significantly reduced compared with the normal-dose protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-dose iCare QCT exhibited high accuracy and precision in measuring lumbar spine BMD, achieving an approximately 85% reduction in radiation dose. These findings highlight its potential as a safer and reliable tool for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1575553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2025.1575553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) has received growing attention for its utility in bone mineral density (BMD) assessment and osteoporosis diagnosis.

Objective: To assess the accuracy and precision of lumbar spine BMD measurements obtained using low-dose iCare QCT, based on the European Spine Phantom (ESP).

Methods: Paired t-test was employed to compare BMD values measured under normal-dose and low-dose scan protocols using Mindways and iCare QCT systems. Accuracy was evaluated using relative measurement error (RME), and precision was assessed via relative standard deviation (RSD). Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were used to examine measurement correlation and agreement.

Results: For Mindways QCT, RMEs of L1-L3 were 11.89%, 6.94%, and 6.72% under normal-dose, and 6.65%, 10.5%, and 6.31% under low-dose, respectively. For iCare QCT, RMEs were 1.21%, 4.28%, and 8.88% under normal-dose, and 2.14%, 4.96%, and 8.59% under low-dose, respectively. RSDs of L1-L3 for Mindways QCT were 5.16%, 2.85%, and 0.47% under normal-dose, and 9.08%, 4.69%, and 0.49% under low-dose, respectively. For iCare QCT, RSDs were 1.11%, 0.81%, and 0.45% under normal-dose, and 2.34%, 0.85%, and 0.33% under low-dose, respectively. The radiation dose in the low-dose protocol was significantly reduced compared with the normal-dose protocol.

Conclusion: Low-dose iCare QCT exhibited high accuracy and precision in measuring lumbar spine BMD, achieving an approximately 85% reduction in radiation dose. These findings highlight its potential as a safer and reliable tool for clinical application.

使用欧洲脊柱假体的mindways和低剂量iCare QCT对腰椎BMD的准确性、精密度和辐射剂量的比较评估。
背景:定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)在骨矿物质密度(BMD)评估和骨质疏松症诊断中的应用越来越受到关注。目的:评估基于欧洲脊柱幻影(ESP)的低剂量iCare QCT测量腰椎骨密度的准确性和精密度。方法:采用配对t检验比较使用Mindways和iCare QCT系统在正常剂量和低剂量扫描方案下测量的BMD值。准确度采用相对测量误差(RME)评价,精密度采用相对标准偏差(RSD)评价。使用Pearson相关系数和Bland-Altman分析来检验测量相关性和一致性。结果:Mindways QCT正常剂量下L1-L3的RMEs分别为11.89%、6.94%、6.72%,低剂量下分别为6.65%、10.5%、6.31%。iCare QCT正常剂量下RMEs分别为1.21%、4.28%、8.88%,低剂量下RMEs分别为2.14%、4.96%、8.59%。正常剂量下,Mindways QCT L1-L3的rsd分别为5.16%、2.85%和0.47%;低剂量下,rsd分别为9.08%、4.69%和0.49%。iCare QCT正常剂量下rsd分别为1.11%、0.81%、0.45%,低剂量下rsd分别为2.34%、0.85%、0.33%。与正常剂量方案相比,低剂量方案中的辐射剂量显著降低。结论:低剂量iCare QCT在测量腰椎骨密度方面具有较高的准确性和精密度,可使辐射剂量降低约85%。这些发现突出了它作为一种更安全可靠的临床应用工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信