Robotic assisted left atrial appendage exclusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and intolerance to oral anticoagulation.

Benjamin D Seadler, Ali Syed, Brody Bien, Mami Sow, Marcie Berger, James Oujiri, G Hossein Almassi, David L Joyce, Stefano Schena, Mario G Gasparri
{"title":"Robotic assisted left atrial appendage exclusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and intolerance to oral anticoagulation.","authors":"Benjamin D Seadler, Ali Syed, Brody Bien, Mami Sow, Marcie Berger, James Oujiri, G Hossein Almassi, David L Joyce, Stefano Schena, Mario G Gasparri","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13101-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral anticoagulation (OAC) and exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) greatly reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with known intolerance to OAC, however, have limited options for transcatheter management of both AF and the LAA. Previous investigation has suggested that minimally invasive LAA exclusion via epicardial clip placement is feasible without OAC but is associated with variable increase in morbidity and mortality. This study aims to assess the safety and long-term efficacy of robotic-assisted LAA exclusion (RA-LAAE) in patients intolerant to OAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, single-center, analysis of patients with AF and OAC intolerance that underwent RA-LAAE between 2019 and 2023. The primary objective assessed was freedom from cerebral and systemic thromboembolic events at 90 days and 1 year. Secondary outcomes included radiographic assessment of successful LAAE, rates of readmission, and overall mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients (mean age 74.6 years, 28% female), with a diagnosis of paroxysmal (48%), persistent (10%), or long-standing (41%) AF, CHA<inf>2</inf>DS<inf>2</inf>VASc 4.4±1.4, HAS-BLED 3.8±0.9, and left atrial volume index 49.1±15.2 underwent RA-LAAE. All procedures were completed successfully with an operative duration of 100±40 minutes. Postoperative length of stay was 1.7±1.3 days. Follow-up imaging at 90 days confirmed successful LAAE for all cases. MACCE within 90 days occurred in 1 (3%) patient and in no additional patients at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RA-LAAE in patients intolerant to OAC appears to be safe and effective with low MACCE and mortality rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"299-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13101-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) and exclusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) greatly reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with known intolerance to OAC, however, have limited options for transcatheter management of both AF and the LAA. Previous investigation has suggested that minimally invasive LAA exclusion via epicardial clip placement is feasible without OAC but is associated with variable increase in morbidity and mortality. This study aims to assess the safety and long-term efficacy of robotic-assisted LAA exclusion (RA-LAAE) in patients intolerant to OAC.

Methods: Retrospective, single-center, analysis of patients with AF and OAC intolerance that underwent RA-LAAE between 2019 and 2023. The primary objective assessed was freedom from cerebral and systemic thromboembolic events at 90 days and 1 year. Secondary outcomes included radiographic assessment of successful LAAE, rates of readmission, and overall mortality.

Results: Twenty-nine patients (mean age 74.6 years, 28% female), with a diagnosis of paroxysmal (48%), persistent (10%), or long-standing (41%) AF, CHA2DS2VASc 4.4±1.4, HAS-BLED 3.8±0.9, and left atrial volume index 49.1±15.2 underwent RA-LAAE. All procedures were completed successfully with an operative duration of 100±40 minutes. Postoperative length of stay was 1.7±1.3 days. Follow-up imaging at 90 days confirmed successful LAAE for all cases. MACCE within 90 days occurred in 1 (3%) patient and in no additional patients at 1 year.

Conclusions: RA-LAAE in patients intolerant to OAC appears to be safe and effective with low MACCE and mortality rates.

机器人辅助心房颤动和口服抗凝不耐受患者左心房附件排除。
背景:口服抗凝剂(OAC)和排除左心房附件(LAA)可大大降低心房颤动(AF)患者血栓栓塞事件的风险。然而,已知对OAC不耐受的患者,经导管治疗AF和LAA的选择有限。先前的研究表明,在没有OAC的情况下,通过心外膜夹置入微创LAA排除是可行的,但与发病率和死亡率的不同增加有关。本研究旨在评估机器人辅助LAA排除(RA-LAAE)治疗OAC不耐受患者的安全性和长期疗效。方法:回顾性、单中心分析2019年至2023年期间接受RA-LAAE治疗的房颤和OAC不耐受患者。评估的主要目标是在90天和1年内无脑和全身血栓栓塞事件。次要结局包括LAAE成功的放射学评估、再入院率和总死亡率。结果:29例房颤患者(平均年龄74.6岁,女性28%)行RA-LAAE,诊断为阵发性房颤(48%)、持续性房颤(10%)或长期房颤(41%),CHA2DS2VASc 4.4±1.4,ha - bled 3.8±0.9,左房容积指数49.1±15.2。所有手术均顺利完成,手术时间为100±40分钟。术后住院时间为1.7±1.3天。90天随访影像证实所有病例LAAE均成功。1例(3%)患者在90天内发生MACCE, 1年内没有其他患者发生MACCE。结论:RA-LAAE治疗OAC不耐受患者安全有效,MACCE低,死亡率低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信