Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture in the Nonagenarian Population: A Comparative Study on Survival Outcomes.

Upamanyu Nath, Ottilie Milne, Rajkumar Sundarapandian, Anand Pillai
{"title":"Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture in the Nonagenarian Population: A Comparative Study on Survival Outcomes.","authors":"Upamanyu Nath, Ottilie Milne, Rajkumar Sundarapandian, Anand Pillai","doi":"10.5371/hp.2025.37.2.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to assess the impact of age and comorbidities on mortality in patients with femur neck fractures, focusing on those individuals aged over 90 years. The objective was to determine if chronological age alone defined frailty and if a dedicated hip fracture unit would improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The retrospective study was conducted over 16 months (January 2017 to April 2018), and included patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty, categorized into Group 1 (aged <90 years) and Group 2 (aged 90 years and above). Detailed data were collected on demographics, mobility, co-morbidity, operative aspects, delays, and mortality. Statistical analysis employed IBM SPSS ver. 25.0, utilizing Mann-Whitney U, Fisher exact, and chi-squared tests with a significance level of <0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 203 patients in our study cohort, 151 were in Group 1, and 52 in Group 2. A significant correlation between high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and mortality after one year (<i>P</i>=0.028) was revealed by logistic regression. Spearman test indicated a positive correlation (0.354) between Charlson comorbidity index scores and ASA grades. Compared to Group 1, Group 2 showed no significant decrease in survival at any studied time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients over 90 years did not represent a uniquely high-risk subset. Frailty was not defined solely by chronological age; a combination of comorbidities and biological age influenced survival rates. The study reinforced that treatment in dedicated hip fracture units and adherence to established guidelines, led to positive outcomes, and reduced mortality, irrespective of age groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":73239,"journal":{"name":"Hip & pelvis","volume":"37 2","pages":"120-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hip & pelvis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2025.37.2.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to assess the impact of age and comorbidities on mortality in patients with femur neck fractures, focusing on those individuals aged over 90 years. The objective was to determine if chronological age alone defined frailty and if a dedicated hip fracture unit would improve patient outcomes.

Materials and methods: The retrospective study was conducted over 16 months (January 2017 to April 2018), and included patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty, categorized into Group 1 (aged <90 years) and Group 2 (aged 90 years and above). Detailed data were collected on demographics, mobility, co-morbidity, operative aspects, delays, and mortality. Statistical analysis employed IBM SPSS ver. 25.0, utilizing Mann-Whitney U, Fisher exact, and chi-squared tests with a significance level of <0.05.

Results: Of the 203 patients in our study cohort, 151 were in Group 1, and 52 in Group 2. A significant correlation between high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and mortality after one year (P=0.028) was revealed by logistic regression. Spearman test indicated a positive correlation (0.354) between Charlson comorbidity index scores and ASA grades. Compared to Group 1, Group 2 showed no significant decrease in survival at any studied time point.

Conclusion: Patients over 90 years did not represent a uniquely high-risk subset. Frailty was not defined solely by chronological age; a combination of comorbidities and biological age influenced survival rates. The study reinforced that treatment in dedicated hip fracture units and adherence to established guidelines, led to positive outcomes, and reduced mortality, irrespective of age groups.

高龄人群股骨颈骨折半关节置换术:生存结果的比较研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估年龄和合并症对股骨颈骨折患者死亡率的影响,重点关注那些年龄超过90岁的患者。目的是确定是否仅按实际年龄定义虚弱,以及专门的髋部骨折单元是否会改善患者的预后。材料和方法:回顾性研究进行了16个月(2017年1月至2018年4月),纳入了接受半关节置换术的患者,分为1组(年龄)。结果:在我们的研究队列中,203例患者中,1组151例,2组52例。经logistic回归分析,美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)分级高与1年后死亡率有显著相关(P=0.028)。Spearman检验显示Charlson合并症指数得分与ASA评分呈正相关(0.354)。与1组相比,2组在任何研究时间点的生存率均无明显下降。结论:90岁以上的患者并不是唯一的高危人群。虚弱并不仅仅由实际年龄来定义;合并症和生物年龄的组合影响生存率。该研究强调,在专门的髋部骨折单位进行治疗,并遵守既定的指导方针,无论年龄组,都能产生积极的结果,并降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信