One-year outcomes of focal pulsed-field ablation for redo procedures in atrial fibrillation and atypical flutter.

IF 2.6
Sebastian Weyand, Viola Adam, Paloma Biehler, Patricia Hägele, Simon Hanger, Stephanie Löbig, Andrei Pinchuk, Felix Ausbuettel, Christian Waechter, Peter Seizer
{"title":"One-year outcomes of focal pulsed-field ablation for redo procedures in atrial fibrillation and atypical flutter.","authors":"Sebastian Weyand, Viola Adam, Paloma Biehler, Patricia Hägele, Simon Hanger, Stephanie Löbig, Andrei Pinchuk, Felix Ausbuettel, Christian Waechter, Peter Seizer","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02079-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Redo ablation procedures are frequently required in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) and atypical atrial flutter following initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). While focal pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising nonthermal alternative, data on its long-term efficacy and safety in redo procedures remain limited. This study evaluates the 1-year outcomes of focal PFA in redo ablations for AF and atypical flutter, focusing on arrhythmia recurrence, procedural success, and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 54 patients undergoing redo ablation with focal PFA at a single center. Procedural endpoints included acute and chronic procedural success, additional ablation line integrity, and complication rates. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed via ECG and 24-h Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete PVI and bidirectional block of all additional ablation lines were confirmed in all cases at the end of the procedure. During the 1-year follow-up, 29.63% of patients experienced arrhythmia recurrence. Among patients undergoing a further redo ablation, reconnections were most frequently observed in the anterior mitral line, suggesting challenges in lesion durability in this region. The overall complication rate was low (1.85%), with one case of coronary vasospasm during cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Focal PFA appears to be a feasible and safe option for redo ablations in AF and atypical flutter, with high acute success rates and acceptable arrhythmia control at 1 year. However, lesion durability, especially for complex lines, remains a limitation, underscoring the need for optimization and further prospective evaluation against thermal ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":"1625-1636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02079-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Redo ablation procedures are frequently required in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) and atypical atrial flutter following initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). While focal pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising nonthermal alternative, data on its long-term efficacy and safety in redo procedures remain limited. This study evaluates the 1-year outcomes of focal PFA in redo ablations for AF and atypical flutter, focusing on arrhythmia recurrence, procedural success, and safety.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 54 patients undergoing redo ablation with focal PFA at a single center. Procedural endpoints included acute and chronic procedural success, additional ablation line integrity, and complication rates. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed via ECG and 24-h Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months.

Results: Complete PVI and bidirectional block of all additional ablation lines were confirmed in all cases at the end of the procedure. During the 1-year follow-up, 29.63% of patients experienced arrhythmia recurrence. Among patients undergoing a further redo ablation, reconnections were most frequently observed in the anterior mitral line, suggesting challenges in lesion durability in this region. The overall complication rate was low (1.85%), with one case of coronary vasospasm during cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.

Conclusion: Focal PFA appears to be a feasible and safe option for redo ablations in AF and atypical flutter, with high acute success rates and acceptable arrhythmia control at 1 year. However, lesion durability, especially for complex lines, remains a limitation, underscoring the need for optimization and further prospective evaluation against thermal ablation.

局部脉冲场消融治疗心房颤动和非典型扑动的一年疗效。
背景:初始肺静脉隔离(PVI)后复发性心房颤动(AF)和非典型心房扑动的患者经常需要重新消融手术。虽然焦点脉冲场消融(PFA)已成为一种很有前途的非热替代方法,但其在重做过程中的长期有效性和安全性数据仍然有限。本研究评估局灶性PFA在房颤和非典型扑动再消融中的1年预后,重点关注心律失常复发、手术成功和安全性。方法:回顾性分析54例单中心局灶性PFA再消融患者的临床资料。手术终点包括急性和慢性手术成功、额外消融线完整性和并发症发生率。6个月和12个月时通过心电图和24小时动态心电图监测评估心律失常复发情况。结果:在手术结束时,所有病例都确认了所有额外消融线的完全PVI和双向阻断。在1年的随访中,29.63%的患者出现心律失常复发。在接受进一步消融的患者中,在二尖瓣前线最常观察到重新连接,这表明该区域的病变持久性存在挑战。总并发症发生率低(1.85%),1例发生冠状血管痉挛。结论:局灶性PFA似乎是房颤和非典型扑动患者再次消融的一种可行和安全的选择,具有高的急性成功率和1年可接受的心律失常控制。然而,病变的耐久性,特别是对于复杂的线路,仍然是一个限制,强调需要优化和对热消融的进一步前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信