Navigating large-scale EHR implementations in public health systems: Lessons learned and recommendations from a rapid review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-28 DOI:10.1177/14604582251347120
Louis Raymond, Aude Motulsky, Gregory Vial, Mickaël Ringeval, Guy Paré
{"title":"Navigating large-scale EHR implementations in public health systems: Lessons learned and recommendations from a rapid review.","authors":"Louis Raymond, Aude Motulsky, Gregory Vial, Mickaël Ringeval, Guy Paré","doi":"10.1177/14604582251347120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This review systematically synthesizes empirical evidence from past NEHR initiatives to identify critical gaps between knowledge and practice and provide actionable insights for policymakers, health IT leaders, and practitioners.<b>Materials and Methods:</b> A rapid review approach was employed, focusing on qualitative content analysis of empirical studies published between 2010 and 2024. The search covered the Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and CINAHL databases. A total of 24 studies met the eligibility criteria and were analyzed across key dimensions.<b>Results:</b> Our analysis reveals that successful NEHR implementation hinges on three interdependent factors: (1) Stakeholder engagement and governance-meaningful clinician involvement and adaptive leadership strategies are crucial for system adoption; (2) Institutional and cultural alignment-the tension between centralized mandates and local adaptation must be carefully managed; and (3) Technological and process standardization-balancing interoperability with customizability remains a persistent challenge. Notably, rigid top-down implementations often face resistance, whereas hybrid \"middle-out\" approaches tend to facilitate smoother transitions.<b>Conclusions:</b> NEHR deployments require a nuanced approach that integrates strategic decision-making, continuous stakeholder engagement, and flexible governance models. Policymakers and project leaders should prioritize participatory implementation strategies, adaptive standardization, and mechanisms for iterative learning to enhance the sustainability and effectiveness of these systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 2","pages":"14604582251347120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251347120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review systematically synthesizes empirical evidence from past NEHR initiatives to identify critical gaps between knowledge and practice and provide actionable insights for policymakers, health IT leaders, and practitioners.Materials and Methods: A rapid review approach was employed, focusing on qualitative content analysis of empirical studies published between 2010 and 2024. The search covered the Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and CINAHL databases. A total of 24 studies met the eligibility criteria and were analyzed across key dimensions.Results: Our analysis reveals that successful NEHR implementation hinges on three interdependent factors: (1) Stakeholder engagement and governance-meaningful clinician involvement and adaptive leadership strategies are crucial for system adoption; (2) Institutional and cultural alignment-the tension between centralized mandates and local adaptation must be carefully managed; and (3) Technological and process standardization-balancing interoperability with customizability remains a persistent challenge. Notably, rigid top-down implementations often face resistance, whereas hybrid "middle-out" approaches tend to facilitate smoother transitions.Conclusions: NEHR deployments require a nuanced approach that integrates strategic decision-making, continuous stakeholder engagement, and flexible governance models. Policymakers and project leaders should prioritize participatory implementation strategies, adaptive standardization, and mechanisms for iterative learning to enhance the sustainability and effectiveness of these systems.

引导公共卫生系统大规模实施电子健康档案:快速审查的经验教训和建议
目的:本综述系统地综合了过去《新卫生条例》倡议的经验证据,以确定知识与实践之间的关键差距,并为政策制定者、卫生IT领导者和从业人员提供可操作的见解。材料与方法:采用快速回顾法,重点对2010 - 2024年间发表的实证研究进行定性内容分析。搜索范围包括Scopus、PubMed、Medline和CINAHL数据库。共有24项研究符合资格标准,并在关键维度上进行了分析。结果:我们的分析表明,《新卫生条例》的成功实施取决于三个相互依存的因素:(1)利益相关者的参与和治理——有意义的临床医生参与和适应性领导策略对系统的采用至关重要;(2)制度和文化的一致性——必须谨慎管理中央集权与地方适应之间的紧张关系;(3)平衡技术和过程标准化与可定制性的互操作性仍然是一个持续的挑战。值得注意的是,严格的自顶向下的实现经常面临阻力,而混合的“中-外”方法倾向于促进更平滑的转换。结论:NEHR部署需要一种微妙的方法,将战略决策、持续的涉众参与和灵活的治理模型集成在一起。决策者和项目领导者应该优先考虑参与性实施策略、适应性标准化和迭代学习机制,以增强这些系统的可持续性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信