Metformin for covid-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BMJ medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001126
Saifur R Chowdhury, Nazmul Islam, Qi Zhou, Md Kamrul Hasan, Mahmudur Rahman Chowdhury, Reed Ac Siemieniuk, Arnav Agarwal, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Thomas Agoritsas, Per Olav Vandvik, Dena Zeraatkar, Gordon Guyatt
{"title":"Metformin for covid-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Saifur R Chowdhury, Nazmul Islam, Qi Zhou, Md Kamrul Hasan, Mahmudur Rahman Chowdhury, Reed Ac Siemieniuk, Arnav Agarwal, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Thomas Agoritsas, Per Olav Vandvik, Dena Zeraatkar, Gordon Guyatt","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarise the effects of metformin on covid-19 to inform a World Health Organization (WHO) clinical practice guideline.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>As part of a living systematic review and network meta-analysis of drug treatments for covid-19 (covid-19 LNMA), a search was performed of the WHO covid-19 database, six Chinese databases, and the Epistemonikos Foundation's Living Overview of the Evidence covid-19 Repository (covid-19 L-OVE).</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: </strong>Randomised controlled trials that compared metformin with placebo in patients with acute covid-19 infection.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Frequentist pairwise meta-analyses were performed using the restricted maximum likelihood random effects model. The effects of interventions on selected outcomes were summarised using risk ratios, risk difference, and mean difference when appropriate, along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To estimate absolute effects, the control arm event rate was used as the baseline risk. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using a modification of the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) approach, with the minimally important difference in effect as the threshold.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three randomised controlled trials of 1869 patients were included; one study provided long term follow-up on long covid. Metformin might have little or no impact on mortality (risk ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.90; risk difference 3 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 8 fewer to 11 more; low certainty). The effects of metformin on admission to hospital because of covid-19 remain uncertain (risk ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.95; risk difference 15 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 42 fewer to 55 more; very low certainty). Metformin results in little or no difference in adverse effects leading to discontinuation (risk difference 0.2 more per 1000, 95% CI 2.7 fewer to 3.1 more; high certainty). Metformin might decrease the development of long covid (risk ratio 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9; risk difference 41 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 62 fewer to 10 fewer; low certainty). However, the effect is based on a single trial of 1126 patients, which has a high risk of bias owing to missing data, and nearly half of the participants were unvaccinated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence based on randomised trials suggests no significant effect of metformin on acute clinical outcomes in patients with non-severe covid-19. Metformin might reduce the incidence of long covid when used to treat patients with non-severe acute covid-19 infection, but this was suggested by low certainty evidence from a single trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e001126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12107632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To summarise the effects of metformin on covid-19 to inform a World Health Organization (WHO) clinical practice guideline.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: As part of a living systematic review and network meta-analysis of drug treatments for covid-19 (covid-19 LNMA), a search was performed of the WHO covid-19 database, six Chinese databases, and the Epistemonikos Foundation's Living Overview of the Evidence covid-19 Repository (covid-19 L-OVE).

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Randomised controlled trials that compared metformin with placebo in patients with acute covid-19 infection.

Data synthesis: Frequentist pairwise meta-analyses were performed using the restricted maximum likelihood random effects model. The effects of interventions on selected outcomes were summarised using risk ratios, risk difference, and mean difference when appropriate, along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To estimate absolute effects, the control arm event rate was used as the baseline risk. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using a modification of the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE (grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation) approach, with the minimally important difference in effect as the threshold.

Results: Three randomised controlled trials of 1869 patients were included; one study provided long term follow-up on long covid. Metformin might have little or no impact on mortality (risk ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.90; risk difference 3 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 8 fewer to 11 more; low certainty). The effects of metformin on admission to hospital because of covid-19 remain uncertain (risk ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.95; risk difference 15 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 42 fewer to 55 more; very low certainty). Metformin results in little or no difference in adverse effects leading to discontinuation (risk difference 0.2 more per 1000, 95% CI 2.7 fewer to 3.1 more; high certainty). Metformin might decrease the development of long covid (risk ratio 0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9; risk difference 41 fewer per 1000, 95% CI 62 fewer to 10 fewer; low certainty). However, the effect is based on a single trial of 1126 patients, which has a high risk of bias owing to missing data, and nearly half of the participants were unvaccinated.

Conclusions: Current evidence based on randomised trials suggests no significant effect of metformin on acute clinical outcomes in patients with non-severe covid-19. Metformin might reduce the incidence of long covid when used to treat patients with non-severe acute covid-19 infection, but this was suggested by low certainty evidence from a single trial.

二甲双胍治疗covid-19:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
目的:总结二甲双胍对covid-19的作用,为世界卫生组织(WHO)临床实践指南提供依据。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据来源:作为covid-19药物治疗活体系统评价和网络荟萃分析(covid-19 LNMA)的一部分,检索了世卫组织covid-19数据库、六个中国数据库和Epistemonikos基金会的covid-19证据库活体概述(covid-19 L-OVE)。选择研究的资格标准:比较急性covid-19感染患者二甲双胍与安慰剂的随机对照试验。数据综合:使用限制最大似然随机效应模型进行频率配对meta分析。采用风险比、风险差和适当时的平均差及其相应的95%置信区间(ci)来总结干预措施对选定结果的影响。为了估计绝对效果,对照组事件发生率被用作基线风险。纳入研究的偏倚风险采用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0工具的改进版进行评估,证据的确定性采用GRADE(推荐评估、发展和评价的分级)方法进行评估,效果上的最小重要差异作为阈值。结果:纳入3项随机对照试验,共1869例患者;一项研究对长期covid进行了长期随访。二甲双胍可能对死亡率影响很小或没有影响(风险比0.76,95% CI 0.30 ~ 1.90;每1000人的风险差减小3,95% CI减小8到增大11;低确定性)。二甲双胍对因covid-19入院的影响仍不确定(风险比0.74,95% CI 0.28至1.95;每1000人的风险差减少15,95% CI减少42至55;非常低的确定性)。二甲双胍导致停药的不良反应差异很小或没有差异(每1000人的风险差异多0.2,95% CI少2.7至多3.1;高确定性)。二甲双胍可能降低长冠肺炎的发生(风险比0.6,95% CI 0.4 ~ 0.9;每1000人的风险差减少41,95% CI减少62至10;低确定性)。然而,这种效果是基于1126名患者的单一试验,由于数据缺失,该试验存在很高的偏倚风险,而且近一半的参与者未接种疫苗。结论:目前基于随机试验的证据表明,二甲双胍对非重症covid-19患者的急性临床结局没有显著影响。二甲双胍用于治疗非严重急性covid-19感染患者时,可能会降低长期covid-19的发病率,但这是由来自单一试验的低确定性证据提出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信