The effect of prophylactic cruroplasty on the incidence of hiatal herniation after robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Cezanne D Kooij, Eline M de Groot, Lucas Goense, B Feike Kingma, Hylke J F Brenkman, Jelle P Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg
{"title":"The effect of prophylactic cruroplasty on the incidence of hiatal herniation after robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).","authors":"Cezanne D Kooij, Eline M de Groot, Lucas Goense, B Feike Kingma, Hylke J F Brenkman, Jelle P Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg","doi":"10.1093/dote/doaf041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hiatal herniation (HH) following esophagectomy can cause severe complications and affect functional outcomes. This study assessed whether prophylactic cruroplasty during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) reduces HH incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing curative RAMIE with cervical anastomosis for esophageal cancer at a high-volume center were included. Cruroplasty became routine in 2017 unless the hiatus was narrow. The primary outcome was HH incidence with versus without cruroplasty. Median follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed HH-free survival and cumulative incidences up to 4 years, considering the time-dependent nature of HH. The log-rank test compared groups. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated the association between cruroplasty and HH, with hazard ratios (HR) and 95%-confidence interval (95%CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2003 and 2023, 366 patients underwent RAMIE with cervical anastomosis. Median follow was 81 months (95%CI 71-91). In the cruroplasty group, 5 (5%) developed a HH (2 symptomatic, 3 asymptomatic), while 23 (9%) of patients without cruroplasty developed a HH (5 acute, 8 symptomatic, 10 asymptomatic). Most HHs were detected within 2 years (71%; n = 20). The 4-year cumulative incidence was 5.7% with cruroplasty and 11.1% without (P = 0.289). Imaging was performed in 77 of 101 patients (76%) with cruroplasty and 228 of 265 patients (86%) without cruroplasty. Cox regression revealed no significant association between cruroplasty and HH (HR 0.652, 95%CI 0.244-1.740).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic cruroplasty may reduce HH in RAMIE with cervical anastomose, though it cannot always prevent HH. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and evaluate its role in other types of esophagectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"38 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hiatal herniation (HH) following esophagectomy can cause severe complications and affect functional outcomes. This study assessed whether prophylactic cruroplasty during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) reduces HH incidence.

Methods: Patients undergoing curative RAMIE with cervical anastomosis for esophageal cancer at a high-volume center were included. Cruroplasty became routine in 2017 unless the hiatus was narrow. The primary outcome was HH incidence with versus without cruroplasty. Median follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Kaplan-Meier curves assessed HH-free survival and cumulative incidences up to 4 years, considering the time-dependent nature of HH. The log-rank test compared groups. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated the association between cruroplasty and HH, with hazard ratios (HR) and 95%-confidence interval (95%CI).

Results: Between 2003 and 2023, 366 patients underwent RAMIE with cervical anastomosis. Median follow was 81 months (95%CI 71-91). In the cruroplasty group, 5 (5%) developed a HH (2 symptomatic, 3 asymptomatic), while 23 (9%) of patients without cruroplasty developed a HH (5 acute, 8 symptomatic, 10 asymptomatic). Most HHs were detected within 2 years (71%; n = 20). The 4-year cumulative incidence was 5.7% with cruroplasty and 11.1% without (P = 0.289). Imaging was performed in 77 of 101 patients (76%) with cruroplasty and 228 of 265 patients (86%) without cruroplasty. Cox regression revealed no significant association between cruroplasty and HH (HR 0.652, 95%CI 0.244-1.740).

Conclusion: Prophylactic cruroplasty may reduce HH in RAMIE with cervical anastomose, though it cannot always prevent HH. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and evaluate its role in other types of esophagectomy.

预防性食管成形术对机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)后食管裂孔疝发生率的影响。
背景:食管切除术后食道裂孔疝(HH)可引起严重的并发症并影响功能预后。本研究评估了机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)期间预防性食管成形术是否能降低HH的发生率。方法:选取在大容量中心行根治性RAMIE颈吻合术治疗食管癌的患者。2017年,除非裂孔狭窄,否则成形术成为常规手术。主要预后指标是行和不行胆囊成形术的HH发生率。中位随访采用反向Kaplan-Meier法计算。考虑到HH的时间依赖性,Kaplan-Meier曲线评估无HH生存期和累计发病率达4年。log-rank检验比较各组。多变量Cox回归用风险比(HR)和95%可信区间(95%CI)评估了成形术与HH之间的关系。结果:2003 ~ 2023年间,366例患者行RAMIE颈吻合术。中位随访为81个月(95%CI 71-91)。在胆囊成形术组中,5例(5%)发生HH(2例有症状,3例无症状),而未行胆囊成形术的患者中有23例(9%)发生HH(5例急性,8例有症状,10例无症状)。大多数HHs在2年内被发现(71%;n = 20)。术后4年累积发生率为5.7%,未术后为11.1% (P = 0.289)。101例行胆囊成形术患者中有77例(76%)行影像学检查,265例未行胆囊成形术患者中有228例(86%)行影像学检查。Cox回归分析显示,成形术与HH无显著相关性(HR 0.652, 95%CI 0.244-1.740)。结论:吻合术虽不能完全预防HH,但预防性成形术可减少颈吻合术患者的HH。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现,并评估其在其他类型食管切除术中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信