Patient acceptability and satisfaction with the rural emergency department nurse practitioner model of care (RED-NP MoC).

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sophie Dilworth, Jean Ball, Michelle Giles, Lynette Lackay, Candice Dahlstrom, Michael Fahy, Peter Massey, Gena Lieschke
{"title":"Patient acceptability and satisfaction with the rural emergency department nurse practitioner model of care (RED-NP MoC).","authors":"Sophie Dilworth, Jean Ball, Michelle Giles, Lynette Lackay, Candice Dahlstrom, Michael Fahy, Peter Massey, Gena Lieschke","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2025.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Australia emergency department (ED) workflows have traditionally been reliant on a medical workforce. Ongoing and critical medical workforce shortages in rural areas have resulted in sub-optimal access to emergency department services. Nurse Practitioners (NP) have been proposed as one solution to the crisis. This study aimed to examine patient experiences and satisfaction with a newly implemented rural emergency department nurse practitioner model of care (RED-NP MoC). Between November 2023 to June 2024, patients seen by NPs in one of five participating emergency departments were invited to complete an anonymous online or telephone survey. A total 382 participants responded to the survey (22 % response rate). Over 90 % of patients agreed or strongly agreed that the NP listened to them, had time to talk to them, explained in a way that could be understood, was thorough, provided high quality care, was trustworthy and gave good advice. Similarly, over 90 % of patients were satisfied with the care they received from the NP and would be happy to see the NP in the ED again. Most additional comments about the RED-NP MoC supported the quantitative findings, expressing positive experiences. The RED-NP-MoC was highly acceptable to surveyed patients attending five rural hospital EDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2025.05.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Australia emergency department (ED) workflows have traditionally been reliant on a medical workforce. Ongoing and critical medical workforce shortages in rural areas have resulted in sub-optimal access to emergency department services. Nurse Practitioners (NP) have been proposed as one solution to the crisis. This study aimed to examine patient experiences and satisfaction with a newly implemented rural emergency department nurse practitioner model of care (RED-NP MoC). Between November 2023 to June 2024, patients seen by NPs in one of five participating emergency departments were invited to complete an anonymous online or telephone survey. A total 382 participants responded to the survey (22 % response rate). Over 90 % of patients agreed or strongly agreed that the NP listened to them, had time to talk to them, explained in a way that could be understood, was thorough, provided high quality care, was trustworthy and gave good advice. Similarly, over 90 % of patients were satisfied with the care they received from the NP and would be happy to see the NP in the ED again. Most additional comments about the RED-NP MoC supported the quantitative findings, expressing positive experiences. The RED-NP-MoC was highly acceptable to surveyed patients attending five rural hospital EDs.

患者对农村急诊科护士执业模式(RED-NP MoC)的接受程度和满意度。
在澳大利亚,急诊科(ED)的工作流程传统上依赖于医务人员。农村地区持续的和严重的医疗人力短缺导致急诊服务的获得不理想。护士从业人员(NP)已被提出作为解决危机的一种方法。本研究旨在调查新实施的农村急诊科护士执业模式(RED-NP MoC)的患者体验和满意度。在2023年11月至2024年6月期间,NPs在五个参与的急诊科之一就诊的患者被邀请完成一项匿名在线或电话调查。共有382名参与者回应了调查(22% %回复率)。超过90% %的患者同意或强烈同意NP倾听他们,有时间与他们交谈,以一种可以理解的方式解释,是彻底的,提供高质量的护理,值得信赖,并给出了很好的建议。同样,超过90% %的患者对他们从NP那里得到的护理感到满意,并且很高兴再次在急诊科看到NP。关于RED-NP MoC的大多数附加评论支持定量研究结果,表达了积极的经验。RED-NP-MoC在5家乡村医院急诊就诊的受访患者中接受度很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信