Health Information Exchange Usage in Japan: Content Analysis of Audit Logs.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Jun Suzumoto, Yukiko Mori, Tomohiro Kuroda
{"title":"Health Information Exchange Usage in Japan: Content Analysis of Audit Logs.","authors":"Jun Suzumoto, Yukiko Mori, Tomohiro Kuroda","doi":"10.2196/65575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Japan, research on the types of medical data requested by health care workers in health information exchanges (HIEs) is limited. Examining the number of views for each data type is important to quantify its benefits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify the types of medical data that are frequently viewed on demand using HIEs in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed audit log data from two HIEs, Choukai Net and PicaPicaLink, covering the period from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2022. First, we calculated the cumulative monthly usage days of the HIEs by each institution for the financial year (FY) 2021/22. Second, we calculated the cumulative annual usage days of the HIEs by each user type for FY 2021/22. Third, we calculated the view rate for each output field and content within each HIE, using institution type or year as the aggregation unit. Fourth, we calculated the cumulative annual usage days of the HIEs for days with and without progress note viewing, and for days without any content viewing. Fifth, we calculated the cumulative number of viewed days for content scheduled to be included in the national HIE compared to that which was not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 32.6% (47/144) of hospitals connected to Choukai Net and 2.3% (20/875) of hospitals connected to PicaPicaLink, cumulative monthly usage days exceeded 101. Additionally, in 32.4% (56/173) of visiting nursing stations connected to Choukai Net, cumulative monthly usage days were over 51. User types viewing HIEs were heavily biased toward institution types other than hospitals. The overall view rate for progress notes was highest among all content types, at 67.4% (83,476/123,915) for Choukai Net and 32.9% (26,159/79,612) for PicaPicaLink. In both HIEs, when comparing by institution type, the view rate for progress notes was highest for visiting nursing stations, reaching 91.8% (5553/6052) for Choukai Net and 65.3% (126/193) for PicaPicaLink. We also found that 17% (5417/31,944) of Choukai Net usage and 9.6% (1802/18,862) of PicaPicaLink usage involved referencing only progress notes in FY 2021/22. The view rate of content scheduled to be included in the national HIE was 45.6% (56,499/123,791) for Choukai Net and 47.7% (37,972/79,612) for PicaPicaLink. Conversely, the view rate for content not scheduled to be included in the national HIE was higher, at 80.2% (99,234/123,791) for Choukai Net and 56.6% (45,052/79,612) for PicaPicaLink.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In both HIEs analyzed in this study, progress notes were the most viewed content. As more health care organizations disclose the progress notes they manage to their HIEs, progress notes are likely to be viewed more frequently. The cost-benefit of disclosing progress notes to HIEs remains unclear, and both health care providers and patients have concerns about privacy risks. Future research is needed to quantify and maximize the benefits of disclosure while mitigating the associated privacy risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"13 ","pages":"e65575"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Japan, research on the types of medical data requested by health care workers in health information exchanges (HIEs) is limited. Examining the number of views for each data type is important to quantify its benefits.

Objective: This study aimed to identify the types of medical data that are frequently viewed on demand using HIEs in Japan.

Methods: We analyzed audit log data from two HIEs, Choukai Net and PicaPicaLink, covering the period from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2022. First, we calculated the cumulative monthly usage days of the HIEs by each institution for the financial year (FY) 2021/22. Second, we calculated the cumulative annual usage days of the HIEs by each user type for FY 2021/22. Third, we calculated the view rate for each output field and content within each HIE, using institution type or year as the aggregation unit. Fourth, we calculated the cumulative annual usage days of the HIEs for days with and without progress note viewing, and for days without any content viewing. Fifth, we calculated the cumulative number of viewed days for content scheduled to be included in the national HIE compared to that which was not.

Results: In 32.6% (47/144) of hospitals connected to Choukai Net and 2.3% (20/875) of hospitals connected to PicaPicaLink, cumulative monthly usage days exceeded 101. Additionally, in 32.4% (56/173) of visiting nursing stations connected to Choukai Net, cumulative monthly usage days were over 51. User types viewing HIEs were heavily biased toward institution types other than hospitals. The overall view rate for progress notes was highest among all content types, at 67.4% (83,476/123,915) for Choukai Net and 32.9% (26,159/79,612) for PicaPicaLink. In both HIEs, when comparing by institution type, the view rate for progress notes was highest for visiting nursing stations, reaching 91.8% (5553/6052) for Choukai Net and 65.3% (126/193) for PicaPicaLink. We also found that 17% (5417/31,944) of Choukai Net usage and 9.6% (1802/18,862) of PicaPicaLink usage involved referencing only progress notes in FY 2021/22. The view rate of content scheduled to be included in the national HIE was 45.6% (56,499/123,791) for Choukai Net and 47.7% (37,972/79,612) for PicaPicaLink. Conversely, the view rate for content not scheduled to be included in the national HIE was higher, at 80.2% (99,234/123,791) for Choukai Net and 56.6% (45,052/79,612) for PicaPicaLink.

Conclusions: In both HIEs analyzed in this study, progress notes were the most viewed content. As more health care organizations disclose the progress notes they manage to their HIEs, progress notes are likely to be viewed more frequently. The cost-benefit of disclosing progress notes to HIEs remains unclear, and both health care providers and patients have concerns about privacy risks. Future research is needed to quantify and maximize the benefits of disclosure while mitigating the associated privacy risks.

日本健康信息交换的使用:审计日志的内容分析。
背景:在日本,对卫生保健工作者在卫生信息交换(HIEs)中要求的医疗数据类型的研究有限。检查每种数据类型的视图数量对于量化其好处非常重要。目的:本研究旨在确定日本使用HIEs经常按需查看的医疗数据类型。方法:我们分析了两家HIEs(聚开网和PicaPicaLink)在2017年4月1日至2022年3月31日期间的审计日志数据。首先,我们计算了每个机构在2021/22财政年度的每月累计使用卫生保健系统的天数。其次,我们计算了2021/22财年每种用户类型的HIEs年度累计使用天数。第三,我们使用机构类型或年份作为聚合单位,计算了每个HIE中每个输出字段和内容的浏览率。第四,我们计算了HIEs的累积年度使用天数,包括查看进度说明的天数和未查看进度说明的天数,以及未查看任何内容的天数。第五,我们计算了计划纳入国家HIE的内容与未纳入国家HIE的内容的累计观看天数。结果:32.6%(47/144)的医院接入了“欠开网”,2.3%(20/875)的医院接入了“PicaPicaLink”,月累计使用天数超过101天。此外,32.4%(56/173)的出入口护理站的月累计使用天数超过51天。查看HIEs的用户类型严重偏向于医院以外的机构类型。在所有内容类型中,进度笔记的总体浏览率最高,在“抄开网”和PicaPicaLink中分别达到67.4%(83,476/123,915)和32.9%(26,159/79,612)。两项调查中,按机构类型进行比较,访问护理站的进度记录浏览率最高,初开网达到91.8% (5553/6052),PicaPicaLink达到65.3%(126/193)。我们还发现,在2021/22财年,17%(5417/ 31944)的欠凯网使用量和9.6%(1802/ 18862)的PicaPicaLink使用量只涉及引用进度说明。拟纳入全国HIE内容的浏览率,chou Net为45.6% (56,499/123,791),PicaPicaLink为47.7%(37,972/79,612)。相反,未计划纳入国家HIE的内容的浏览率更高,“不开网”的浏览率为80.2% (99,234/123,791),PicaPicaLink的浏览率为56.6%(45,052/79,612)。结论:在本研究分析的两个HIEs中,进度记录是浏览次数最多的内容。随着越来越多的卫生保健组织向其卫生保健官披露他们管理的进度记录,进度记录可能会被更频繁地查看。向卫生保健机构披露进展记录的成本效益尚不清楚,卫生保健提供者和患者都担心隐私风险。未来的研究需要量化和最大化披露的好处,同时减轻相关的隐私风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信