Recommendations for the Clinical Practice concerning the Use of Cholangiopancreatoscopy: Proceedings from a Consensus Meeting.

IF 1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jorge Canena, Pedro Pereira, Tiago Bana E Costa, David Horta, Luís Carvalho Lourenço, Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto, Isabel Tarrio, Ana Rita Franco, Tarcísio Araújo, Luís Lopes
{"title":"Recommendations for the Clinical Practice concerning the Use of Cholangiopancreatoscopy: Proceedings from a Consensus Meeting.","authors":"Jorge Canena, Pedro Pereira, Tiago Bana E Costa, David Horta, Luís Carvalho Lourenço, Eduardo Rodrigues-Pinto, Isabel Tarrio, Ana Rita Franco, Tarcísio Araújo, Luís Lopes","doi":"10.1159/000545718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After a consensus meeting including experts from all over the country (more than 6 years of experience, at least 50 procedures and their center perform more than 30 procedures/year), several recommendations were issued. Main recommendations: (1) Single-operator digital cholangioscopy is indicated in cases of undetermined biliary strictures (UBSs) in which visual inspection, with or without histology, may change the patient's approach. (Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence). (2) In a cholangioscopy for a stricture of unclear etiology, the optical assessment aspects should be recorded in a standardized report and, according to the endoscopist's visual impression, suggest a malignant or benign etiology. (Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). (3) When using cholangioscopy regardless of the visual impression, biopsies of the stenosis should be taken (ideally in a number equal to or greater than 6 fragments). (Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence). (4) Cholangioscopy with biopsies has a high diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of UBSs, with a technical success >98% and visual diagnosis with sensitivity/specificity >95%. However, it must be considered that the sensitivity of histological diagnosis is lower (around 70%). (Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). (5) The single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC)-assisted lithotripsy is a safe procedure associated with high rates of success. (Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). (6) SOC-assisted lithotripsy should be reserved for selected cases in which conventional techniques for the treatment of difficult biliary stones have failed. However, SOC-assisted lithotripsy should be used early in the treatment algorithm to avoid repeated procedures. (Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence). (7) Pancreatoscopy can allow the diagnosis of lesions suggestive of malignancy in the pancreatic duct of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the main duct with high sensitivity and specificity. The groups of patients who benefit most from its use are those with a diffusely dilated duct with a diameter greater than 10 mm, and in whom sectional imaging methods and endoscopic ultrasound do not reveal focal lesions. (Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). (8) The use of intraductal lithotripsy guided by pancreatoscopy in patients with lithiasis in the main pancreatic duct should be reserved for patients with pain and lithiasis greater than 5 mm that cannot be removed using conventional techniques. Patients with an excessively distal location in the tail or head may cause increased technical difficulty. (Low recommendation, low quality of evidence).</p>","PeriodicalId":51838,"journal":{"name":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After a consensus meeting including experts from all over the country (more than 6 years of experience, at least 50 procedures and their center perform more than 30 procedures/year), several recommendations were issued. Main recommendations: (1) Single-operator digital cholangioscopy is indicated in cases of undetermined biliary strictures (UBSs) in which visual inspection, with or without histology, may change the patient's approach. (Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence). (2) In a cholangioscopy for a stricture of unclear etiology, the optical assessment aspects should be recorded in a standardized report and, according to the endoscopist's visual impression, suggest a malignant or benign etiology. (Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). (3) When using cholangioscopy regardless of the visual impression, biopsies of the stenosis should be taken (ideally in a number equal to or greater than 6 fragments). (Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence). (4) Cholangioscopy with biopsies has a high diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of UBSs, with a technical success >98% and visual diagnosis with sensitivity/specificity >95%. However, it must be considered that the sensitivity of histological diagnosis is lower (around 70%). (Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). (5) The single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC)-assisted lithotripsy is a safe procedure associated with high rates of success. (Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence). (6) SOC-assisted lithotripsy should be reserved for selected cases in which conventional techniques for the treatment of difficult biliary stones have failed. However, SOC-assisted lithotripsy should be used early in the treatment algorithm to avoid repeated procedures. (Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence). (7) Pancreatoscopy can allow the diagnosis of lesions suggestive of malignancy in the pancreatic duct of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the main duct with high sensitivity and specificity. The groups of patients who benefit most from its use are those with a diffusely dilated duct with a diameter greater than 10 mm, and in whom sectional imaging methods and endoscopic ultrasound do not reveal focal lesions. (Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence). (8) The use of intraductal lithotripsy guided by pancreatoscopy in patients with lithiasis in the main pancreatic duct should be reserved for patients with pain and lithiasis greater than 5 mm that cannot be removed using conventional techniques. Patients with an excessively distal location in the tail or head may cause increased technical difficulty. (Low recommendation, low quality of evidence).

关于使用胆管胰脏镜检查的临床实践建议:共识会议记录。
经过全国专家(6年以上经验,至少50例手术,中心每年执行30例以上)的共识会议,提出了若干建议。主要建议:(1)对于不明原因的胆道狭窄(ubs),无论有无组织学,目视检查都可能改变患者的入路,应采用单操作数字胆道镜检查。(强烈推荐,证据质量中等)。(2)对病因不明的狭窄进行胆管镜检查时,应将光学评估方面记录在标准化报告中,并根据内镜医师的视觉印象判断其病因是恶性还是良性。(强烈推荐,高质量的证据)。(3)不论视觉印象如何,在胆道镜检查时,均应对狭窄处进行活检(最好是6片或6片以上)。(强烈推荐,证据质量中等)。(4)胆管镜活检对ubs的诊断准确率较高,技术成功率>98%,视觉诊断灵敏度/特异性>95%。然而,必须考虑到组织学诊断的敏感性较低(约为70%)。(强烈推荐,高质量的证据)。(5)单操作胆管镜(SOC)辅助碎石是一种安全的手术,成功率高。(强烈推荐,高质量的证据)。(6) soc辅助碎石应保留用于传统技术治疗难治性胆结石失败的特定病例。然而,soc辅助碎石应在治疗方案的早期使用,以避免重复操作。(强烈推荐,证据质量中等)。(7)胰镜检查对主管乳头状黏液性肿瘤患者胰管内提示恶性病变的诊断具有较高的敏感性和特异性。使用该方法获益最多的患者是那些导管弥漫性扩张且直径大于10mm的患者,在这些患者中,断层成像方法和内窥镜超声不能显示局灶性病变。(弱推荐,证据质量低)。(8)对于主胰管结石患者,胰镜引导下的导管内碎石应保留给疼痛且结石大于5mm且常规技术无法取出的患者。尾部或头部位置过远的患者可能会增加技术难度。(低推荐,低证据质量)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology
GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology'' (formerly Jornal Português de Gastrenterologia), founded in 1994, is the official publication of Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia (Portuguese Society of Gastroenterology), Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (Portuguese Society of Digestive Endoscopy) and Associação Portuguesa para o Estudo do Fígado (Portuguese Association for the Study of the Liver). The journal publishes clinical and basic research articles on Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy, Hepatology and related topics. Review articles, clinical case studies, images, letters to the editor and other articles such as recommendations or papers on gastroenterology clinical practice are also considered. Only articles written in English are accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信