Feasibility of a Multidisciplinary Procedural Team Dedicated to Complex In-Patient Bedside Procedures.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Daniel Ricaurte, Michael Russo, Patrick Deegan, Pallavi Nadendla, Steve Lee, Matthew Lissauer, William Sardella, Adam Steinberg
{"title":"Feasibility of a Multidisciplinary Procedural Team Dedicated to Complex In-Patient Bedside Procedures.","authors":"Daniel Ricaurte, Michael Russo, Patrick Deegan, Pallavi Nadendla, Steve Lee, Matthew Lissauer, William Sardella, Adam Steinberg","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospitals have found difficulties performing routine procedures in a cost-effective and timely manner. We created a multidisciplinary \"In-patient Procedural Team\" (IPT) with the intent to meet the demand of nonvascular, nonenteral access procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A team was assembled comprising advanced practice providers and sonographers with oversight by a surgeon. The IPT scope of practice includes thoracentesis, paracentesis, and lumbar punctures, performed at the bedside under ultrasound guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 11 months, 2,453 procedures were performed. Of those, 1,196 were paracentesis, 1,099 thoracentesis (with 70 pigtail chest tubes placed), and 88 lumbar punctures. An 80.9% decrease in average consult completion time (9.75 hours vs. 1.86 hours, p < .01) and an 80.9% decrease in case creation-to-procedure start time (13.92 hours vs. 2.66 hours, p < .01) were found. When compared with pre-IPT data, procedures were now completed a mean of 19.2 hours earlier than historic controls. An estimate of 710 off-floor nursing hours were saved. In total, 3,500 patient transports around the hospital were eliminated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The creation of an IPT intended to tackle complex in-patient procedures is a safe way to reduce time-to-procedure and off-floor nursing time while maintaining high-quality standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hospitals have found difficulties performing routine procedures in a cost-effective and timely manner. We created a multidisciplinary "In-patient Procedural Team" (IPT) with the intent to meet the demand of nonvascular, nonenteral access procedures.

Methods: A team was assembled comprising advanced practice providers and sonographers with oversight by a surgeon. The IPT scope of practice includes thoracentesis, paracentesis, and lumbar punctures, performed at the bedside under ultrasound guidance.

Results: During 11 months, 2,453 procedures were performed. Of those, 1,196 were paracentesis, 1,099 thoracentesis (with 70 pigtail chest tubes placed), and 88 lumbar punctures. An 80.9% decrease in average consult completion time (9.75 hours vs. 1.86 hours, p < .01) and an 80.9% decrease in case creation-to-procedure start time (13.92 hours vs. 2.66 hours, p < .01) were found. When compared with pre-IPT data, procedures were now completed a mean of 19.2 hours earlier than historic controls. An estimate of 710 off-floor nursing hours were saved. In total, 3,500 patient transports around the hospital were eliminated.

Conclusions: The creation of an IPT intended to tackle complex in-patient procedures is a safe way to reduce time-to-procedure and off-floor nursing time while maintaining high-quality standards.

多学科程序团队致力于复杂的住院病人床边程序的可行性。
导言:医院发现难以以具有成本效益和及时的方式执行常规程序。我们创建了一个多学科的“住院手术小组”(IPT),旨在满足非血管、非肠内通路手术的需求。方法:在一名外科医生的监督下,由高级执业医师和超声医师组成一个小组。IPT的实践范围包括在床边超声引导下进行的胸穿刺、穿刺旁穿刺和腰椎穿刺。结果:11个月内共行2453例手术。其中,1196例为穿刺术,1099例为胸穿刺(置入70根辫子胸管),88例为腰椎穿刺。平均会诊完成时间减少80.9%(9.75小时比1.86小时,p < 0.01),病例创建到手术开始时间减少80.9%(13.92小时比2.66小时,p < 0.01)。与ipt前的数据相比,现在完成手术的时间比历史对照平均提前19.2小时。估计节省了710个楼外护理小时。总共取消了医院周围3500名病人的运送。结论:创建IPT旨在解决复杂的住院手术是一种安全的方法,可以减少手术时间和场外护理时间,同时保持高质量的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Journal for Healthcare Quality HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as: Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信