Daniel Ricaurte, Michael Russo, Patrick Deegan, Pallavi Nadendla, Steve Lee, Matthew Lissauer, William Sardella, Adam Steinberg
{"title":"Feasibility of a Multidisciplinary Procedural Team Dedicated to Complex In-Patient Bedside Procedures.","authors":"Daniel Ricaurte, Michael Russo, Patrick Deegan, Pallavi Nadendla, Steve Lee, Matthew Lissauer, William Sardella, Adam Steinberg","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospitals have found difficulties performing routine procedures in a cost-effective and timely manner. We created a multidisciplinary \"In-patient Procedural Team\" (IPT) with the intent to meet the demand of nonvascular, nonenteral access procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A team was assembled comprising advanced practice providers and sonographers with oversight by a surgeon. The IPT scope of practice includes thoracentesis, paracentesis, and lumbar punctures, performed at the bedside under ultrasound guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 11 months, 2,453 procedures were performed. Of those, 1,196 were paracentesis, 1,099 thoracentesis (with 70 pigtail chest tubes placed), and 88 lumbar punctures. An 80.9% decrease in average consult completion time (9.75 hours vs. 1.86 hours, p < .01) and an 80.9% decrease in case creation-to-procedure start time (13.92 hours vs. 2.66 hours, p < .01) were found. When compared with pre-IPT data, procedures were now completed a mean of 19.2 hours earlier than historic controls. An estimate of 710 off-floor nursing hours were saved. In total, 3,500 patient transports around the hospital were eliminated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The creation of an IPT intended to tackle complex in-patient procedures is a safe way to reduce time-to-procedure and off-floor nursing time while maintaining high-quality standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Hospitals have found difficulties performing routine procedures in a cost-effective and timely manner. We created a multidisciplinary "In-patient Procedural Team" (IPT) with the intent to meet the demand of nonvascular, nonenteral access procedures.
Methods: A team was assembled comprising advanced practice providers and sonographers with oversight by a surgeon. The IPT scope of practice includes thoracentesis, paracentesis, and lumbar punctures, performed at the bedside under ultrasound guidance.
Results: During 11 months, 2,453 procedures were performed. Of those, 1,196 were paracentesis, 1,099 thoracentesis (with 70 pigtail chest tubes placed), and 88 lumbar punctures. An 80.9% decrease in average consult completion time (9.75 hours vs. 1.86 hours, p < .01) and an 80.9% decrease in case creation-to-procedure start time (13.92 hours vs. 2.66 hours, p < .01) were found. When compared with pre-IPT data, procedures were now completed a mean of 19.2 hours earlier than historic controls. An estimate of 710 off-floor nursing hours were saved. In total, 3,500 patient transports around the hospital were eliminated.
Conclusions: The creation of an IPT intended to tackle complex in-patient procedures is a safe way to reduce time-to-procedure and off-floor nursing time while maintaining high-quality standards.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®.
The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as:
Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform