Comparison of the air kerma standards of ARPANSA, Australia, and the IAEA in RQR, RQA, and RQT diagnostic X-ray beams.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Kam L Lee, Zakithi Msimang, Duncan Butler, Peter Thomas, Joao Cardoso
{"title":"Comparison of the air kerma standards of ARPANSA, Australia, and the IAEA in RQR, RQA, and RQT diagnostic X-ray beams.","authors":"Kam L Lee, Zakithi Msimang, Duncan Butler, Peter Thomas, Joao Cardoso","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01570-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A comparison of air kerma standards between the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was carried out for the RQR, RQA and RQT radiation qualities (as prescribed by IEC 61267 or IAEA TRS 457) using two ionisation chambers as transfer standards. The ratios between the IAEA and ARPANSA calibration coefficients ranged between 0.993 and 0.997 for RQR beams, 0.990 and 0.999 for RQA beams, and 0.993 to 0.994 for RQT beams. The relative expanded uncertainty for IAEA and ARPANSA was 1.2 and 1.4% respectively, and the comparison results agree at around the level of, or better than, the combined standard uncertainty of 0.74% for all the beams.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1137-1144"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01570-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comparison of air kerma standards between the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was carried out for the RQR, RQA and RQT radiation qualities (as prescribed by IEC 61267 or IAEA TRS 457) using two ionisation chambers as transfer standards. The ratios between the IAEA and ARPANSA calibration coefficients ranged between 0.993 and 0.997 for RQR beams, 0.990 and 0.999 for RQA beams, and 0.993 to 0.994 for RQT beams. The relative expanded uncertainty for IAEA and ARPANSA was 1.2 and 1.4% respectively, and the comparison results agree at around the level of, or better than, the combined standard uncertainty of 0.74% for all the beams.

澳大利亚ARPANSA和IAEA在RQR、RQA和RQT诊断x射线中空气质量标准的比较。
澳大利亚辐射防护和核安全局(ARPANSA)和国际原子能机构(IAEA)的空气质量标准进行了比较,RQR, RQA和RQT辐射质量(按照IEC 61267或IAEA TRS 457的规定)使用两个电离室作为转移标准。RQR光束的IAEA和ARPANSA校准系数之比为0.993 ~ 0.997,RQA光束的IAEA和ARPANSA校准系数之比为0.990 ~ 0.999,RQT光束的校准系数之比为0.993 ~ 0.994。IAEA和ARPANSA的相对扩展不确定度分别为1.2和1.4%,所有光束的比较结果在0.74%的综合标准不确定度附近或更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信