Understanding racial socialization division of labor practices in dual-Black and interracial parenting dyads.

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Family Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.1037/fam0001350
Broquelynn D Shepard, Shawn C T Jones, Jaden K Anderson
{"title":"Understanding racial socialization division of labor practices in dual-Black and interracial parenting dyads.","authors":"Broquelynn D Shepard, Shawn C T Jones, Jaden K Anderson","doi":"10.1037/fam0001350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past several decades, there has been a limited but growing body of literature examining parental factors in the racial socialization (RS) process, particularly conversations between parents about the delivery, timing, and labor of RS conversations (Jones & Neblett, 2019; McNeil Smith et al., 2016). Simultaneously, a unique subset of researchers is investigating RS practices of parents of Black-White biracial children (Csizmadia et al., 2014; Stone & Dolbin-MacNab, 2017). The dearth of research examining intraparental dyadic communication makes it clear that there is a need to continue examining the RS dialogue between romantically involved couples rearing Black and biracial children as an extension of parenting (Jones & Neblett, 2019). Using elements of phenomenological inquiry (Spigelberg, 1982), the present study investigated one facet of parenting decisions regarding RS: division of labor (DOL) in romantically involved parenting dyads. Themes included <i>approaches to DOL, factors influencing DOL,</i> and <i>navigation of coparenting dynamics</i> as well as related subthemes and focused codes. Further analyses suggested that despite racial structures, parents of Black and biracial youth are social agents in the RS process; their intraparental dyadic conversations impact their DOL practices and parenting dynamics. Regardless of the role played in the RS conversation, every parent in the present study described feeling supported and providing support in relaying RS messages with their coparenting partner. Unique findings were present among interracial dyads (e.g., <i>racialized upbringing</i>) and mothers and fathers (e.g., <i>balancing one another</i>). Clinical implications and future directions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"816-826"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001350","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past several decades, there has been a limited but growing body of literature examining parental factors in the racial socialization (RS) process, particularly conversations between parents about the delivery, timing, and labor of RS conversations (Jones & Neblett, 2019; McNeil Smith et al., 2016). Simultaneously, a unique subset of researchers is investigating RS practices of parents of Black-White biracial children (Csizmadia et al., 2014; Stone & Dolbin-MacNab, 2017). The dearth of research examining intraparental dyadic communication makes it clear that there is a need to continue examining the RS dialogue between romantically involved couples rearing Black and biracial children as an extension of parenting (Jones & Neblett, 2019). Using elements of phenomenological inquiry (Spigelberg, 1982), the present study investigated one facet of parenting decisions regarding RS: division of labor (DOL) in romantically involved parenting dyads. Themes included approaches to DOL, factors influencing DOL, and navigation of coparenting dynamics as well as related subthemes and focused codes. Further analyses suggested that despite racial structures, parents of Black and biracial youth are social agents in the RS process; their intraparental dyadic conversations impact their DOL practices and parenting dynamics. Regardless of the role played in the RS conversation, every parent in the present study described feeling supported and providing support in relaying RS messages with their coparenting partner. Unique findings were present among interracial dyads (e.g., racialized upbringing) and mothers and fathers (e.g., balancing one another). Clinical implications and future directions are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

理解双黑人和跨种族父母对种族社会化分工的实践。
在过去的几十年里,越来越多的文献研究了种族社会化(RS)过程中的父母因素,特别是父母之间关于RS对话的交付、时间和劳动的对话(Jones & Neblett, 2019;麦克尼尔·史密斯等人,2016)。与此同时,一个独特的研究群体正在调查黑人-白人混血儿父母的RS做法(Csizmadia等人,2014;Stone & Dolbin-MacNab出版社,2017)。缺乏关于父母内部二元沟通的研究清楚地表明,有必要继续研究养育黑人和混血儿的浪漫夫妻之间的RS对话,作为养育子女的延伸(Jones & Neblett, 2019)。本研究使用现象学调查的要素(Spigelberg, 1982),调查了涉及浪漫关系的养育夫妻中关于RS的养育决策的一个方面:劳动分工(DOL)。主题包括DOL的方法、影响DOL的因素、亲子关系动态导航以及相关的子主题和重点代码。进一步的分析表明,尽管存在种族结构,黑人和混血儿青年的父母是RS过程中的社会代理人;他们的父母内部二元对话影响他们的DOL实践和育儿动态。无论在RS对话中扮演什么角色,本研究中的每个父母都描述了在与他们的父母伴侣传递RS信息时感到被支持并提供支持。在跨种族的二人组(例如,种族化的养育)和母亲和父亲(例如,相互平衡)中出现了独特的发现。讨论了临床意义和未来发展方向。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信