The Pressures of Neoliberal Managerialism: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Work Supervisors.

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Social work Pub Date : 2025-05-28 DOI:10.1093/sw/swaf015
Jessica Toft, Ruth Soffer-Elnekave, Mingyang Zheng, Molly Calhoun, Elizabeth Lightfoot
{"title":"The Pressures of Neoliberal Managerialism: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Work Supervisors.","authors":"Jessica Toft, Ruth Soffer-Elnekave, Mingyang Zheng, Molly Calhoun, Elizabeth Lightfoot","doi":"10.1093/sw/swaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Supervisors play a key role in social work's claim of professional authority through their efforts to promote high-quality ethical practice. Understanding the nature and extent to which social work supervisors help ensure professionalism in their organizational context is a critical concern for the public and the profession. The purpose of this article is to explore social work supervision in the context of neoliberal managerial pressures with a focus on the professional discretion and resistance to neoliberalism of social work supervisors. Utilizing a cross-sectional survey design, the research measured managerialism, professional discretion, and resistance among 275 Minnesota licensed social work supervisors. The results of the survey demonstrated that on average social work supervisors act as a conduit of neoliberal governance, pressured to ensure worker productivity and efficiency, while facilitating the standardization of direct-line practice. Yet, some responses are contradictory in regard to reporting support for integrating clients' interests while maintaining organizational pressure for predetermined interventions. Finally, the research may signal the supervisor dilemma of how to support the interests of professional social workers while positioned as managers themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":21875,"journal":{"name":"Social work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaf015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supervisors play a key role in social work's claim of professional authority through their efforts to promote high-quality ethical practice. Understanding the nature and extent to which social work supervisors help ensure professionalism in their organizational context is a critical concern for the public and the profession. The purpose of this article is to explore social work supervision in the context of neoliberal managerial pressures with a focus on the professional discretion and resistance to neoliberalism of social work supervisors. Utilizing a cross-sectional survey design, the research measured managerialism, professional discretion, and resistance among 275 Minnesota licensed social work supervisors. The results of the survey demonstrated that on average social work supervisors act as a conduit of neoliberal governance, pressured to ensure worker productivity and efficiency, while facilitating the standardization of direct-line practice. Yet, some responses are contradictory in regard to reporting support for integrating clients' interests while maintaining organizational pressure for predetermined interventions. Finally, the research may signal the supervisor dilemma of how to support the interests of professional social workers while positioned as managers themselves.

新自由主义管理主义的压力:社会工作主管的挑战与机遇。
主管通过努力促进高质量的道德实践,在社会工作的专业权威主张中发挥着关键作用。了解社会工作主管在其组织环境中帮助确保专业精神的性质和程度是公众和专业人士关注的关键问题。本文的目的是探讨新自由主义管理压力背景下的社会工作监督,重点关注社会工作监督员的专业自由裁量权和对新自由主义的抵制。利用横断面调查设计,研究测量了275名明尼苏达州注册社会工作主管的管理主义、专业判断力和阻力。调查结果表明,平均而言,社会工作监督者充当了新自由主义治理的渠道,在确保工人生产力和效率的同时,促进了直接实践的标准化。然而,在报告支持整合客户利益的同时保持组织对预定干预措施的压力方面,一些回应是矛盾的。最后,该研究可能会提示管理者的困境,即如何在自身定位为管理者的同时支持专业社会工作者的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social work
Social work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信