Characteristics of Rapidly Manufactured Ventilators: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Katie Mikkelsen, Marco Zaccagnini, Ginny Brunton, Ali Hosseini, Maria C Tan, Mika L Nonoyama
{"title":"Characteristics of Rapidly Manufactured Ventilators: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Katie Mikkelsen, Marco Zaccagnini, Ginny Brunton, Ali Hosseini, Maria C Tan, Mika L Nonoyama","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many health care systems worldwide were ill-prepared for the mass-casualty surge caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Mechanical ventilator shortages prompted the production of rapidly manufactured ventilators (RMVs). However, without standards to develop them, the effectiveness and safety of RMVs remain uncertain. The purpose of this study was to map the breadth and depth of the literature on RMVs and provide suggestions for effective and safe designs. A scoping review, following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, was completed. A search of 9 electronic databases and Google Scholar was completed in April 2022 and updated in 2024. Dual screening and data extraction were conducted using predefined criteria based on 6 previously published RMV guidance documents. Results were collated into descriptive summaries and tables and used to develop the suggested standards. There were 66 RMVs described within 66 articles. The majority (60, 91%) of articles were published post-COVID-19 (2020), with 24 (36%) from the United States. Four designs were identified: 18 (27%) electro-pneumatic (E-P), 27 (41%) automatic compression of manual resuscitator (MR), 6 (9%) automatic compression of MR with E-P components (E-P and MR), and 15 (23%) \"other.\" The E-P designs mimicked conventional ventilators and MR designs incorporated an MR with a motor and arm. Four RMV characteristic categories emerged from the data: operating features, performance features, other features outside routine use, and engineering features. There was significant variability in the RMV designs. Eleven suggestions regarding RMV design, performance, and testing were developed. This study provides preliminary information to inform the standardization of RMV designs to guide future manufacturing for effective and safe use. Although pandemic urgency has waned, RMV utility may extend to future mass-casualty scenarios (eg, natural disasters, wars) and in low- and middle-income countries, which often lack sufficient resources even under normal conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many health care systems worldwide were ill-prepared for the mass-casualty surge caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Mechanical ventilator shortages prompted the production of rapidly manufactured ventilators (RMVs). However, without standards to develop them, the effectiveness and safety of RMVs remain uncertain. The purpose of this study was to map the breadth and depth of the literature on RMVs and provide suggestions for effective and safe designs. A scoping review, following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, was completed. A search of 9 electronic databases and Google Scholar was completed in April 2022 and updated in 2024. Dual screening and data extraction were conducted using predefined criteria based on 6 previously published RMV guidance documents. Results were collated into descriptive summaries and tables and used to develop the suggested standards. There were 66 RMVs described within 66 articles. The majority (60, 91%) of articles were published post-COVID-19 (2020), with 24 (36%) from the United States. Four designs were identified: 18 (27%) electro-pneumatic (E-P), 27 (41%) automatic compression of manual resuscitator (MR), 6 (9%) automatic compression of MR with E-P components (E-P and MR), and 15 (23%) "other." The E-P designs mimicked conventional ventilators and MR designs incorporated an MR with a motor and arm. Four RMV characteristic categories emerged from the data: operating features, performance features, other features outside routine use, and engineering features. There was significant variability in the RMV designs. Eleven suggestions regarding RMV design, performance, and testing were developed. This study provides preliminary information to inform the standardization of RMV designs to guide future manufacturing for effective and safe use. Although pandemic urgency has waned, RMV utility may extend to future mass-casualty scenarios (eg, natural disasters, wars) and in low- and middle-income countries, which often lack sufficient resources even under normal conditions.

快速制造呼吸机的特点:范围综述。
全球许多卫生保健系统对COVID-19大流行造成的大规模伤亡激增准备不足。机械呼吸机的短缺促使了快速制造呼吸机(rmv)的生产。然而,由于没有标准来制定,rmv的有效性和安全性仍然不确定。本研究的目的是绘制关于rmv文献的广度和深度,并为有效和安全的设计提供建议。根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所的指导方针,完成了范围审查。对9个电子数据库和谷歌Scholar的检索于2022年4月完成,并于2024年更新。双重筛选和数据提取使用预先确定的标准进行,该标准基于6份先前公布的RMV指导文件。结果被整理成描述性摘要和表格,并用于制定建议的标准。66篇文章中描述了66个rmv。大多数文章(60.91%)发表于2019冠状病毒病(2020年)后,其中24篇(36%)来自美国。确定了四种设计:18种(27%)电动气动(E-P), 27种(41%)手动复苏器(MR)自动压缩,6种(9%)带有E-P组件的MR自动压缩(E-P和MR), 15种(23%)。“其他”。E-P设计模仿了传统的呼吸机,MR设计将MR与马达和手臂结合在一起。从数据中可以得出RMV的四个特征类别:操作特征、性能特征、日常使用之外的其他特征和工程特征。RMV设计存在显著的可变性。提出了关于RMV设计、性能和测试的11条建议。本研究为RMV设计的标准化提供了初步信息,以指导未来制造有效和安全的使用。虽然大流行病的紧迫性已经减弱,但RMV的效用可能会扩大到未来的大规模伤亡情景(例如,自然灾害、战争)以及在低收入和中等收入国家,这些国家即使在正常情况下也往往缺乏足够的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信