Mini-subcostal incision technique for open radical nephrectomy: A practical alternative for complex renal masses.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Kyle A Blum, Chun Huang, A Ari Hakimi, Paul Russo
{"title":"Mini-subcostal incision technique for open radical nephrectomy: A practical alternative for complex renal masses.","authors":"Kyle A Blum, Chun Huang, A Ari Hakimi, Paul Russo","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the open radical nephrectomy mini-subcostal incision technique (msRN) and evaluate renal function, perioperative, and oncological outcomes as an alternative to traditional or minimally invasive nephrectomy for complex renal masses. This study aims to document the msRN approach, highlighting its value in preserving open nephrectomy skills for selected cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing msRN from 2013 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. An 8 to 12 cm incision between the costal margin and 11th rib was used, with all patients managed using a rapid recovery pathway. Clinicopathologic, perioperative, and renal function metrics were analyzed. Statistical analyses included univariable and multivariable logistic regression for predictors of length of stay (LOS) >2 days and 30-day complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival, and significance was set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 193 patients (median age 59.5, IQR 58.4-68.8), median tumor size was 7.2 cm (IQR 5.0-9.6), and 67.9% were ≥pT3. Notably, 56% of patients had a high R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry score, and 41.5% had a moderate score, highlighting the complexity of the cases. Median incision was 10 cm, operating time 123 minutes (IQR 102-151), and EBL 300 mL (IQR 100-550). Twenty-three (11.9%) received blood transfusions, and median LOS was 2 days. Predictors of LOS >2 days included age (OR 1.27, P = 0.003) and operating time (OR 1.12, P = 0.015). The 30-day complication rate was 18.1%, with predictors including tumor size (OR 1.14, P = 0.032) and transfusion (OR 3.04, P = 0.031). Median eGFR decreased 34.1%, with no dialysis requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>msRN provides favorable outcomes, serving as a practical alternative to traditional and MIS approaches. Its documented utility supports the continued relevance of open surgical techniques for complex renal cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.04.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the open radical nephrectomy mini-subcostal incision technique (msRN) and evaluate renal function, perioperative, and oncological outcomes as an alternative to traditional or minimally invasive nephrectomy for complex renal masses. This study aims to document the msRN approach, highlighting its value in preserving open nephrectomy skills for selected cases.

Methods: Patients undergoing msRN from 2013 to 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. An 8 to 12 cm incision between the costal margin and 11th rib was used, with all patients managed using a rapid recovery pathway. Clinicopathologic, perioperative, and renal function metrics were analyzed. Statistical analyses included univariable and multivariable logistic regression for predictors of length of stay (LOS) >2 days and 30-day complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival, and significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: In 193 patients (median age 59.5, IQR 58.4-68.8), median tumor size was 7.2 cm (IQR 5.0-9.6), and 67.9% were ≥pT3. Notably, 56% of patients had a high R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry score, and 41.5% had a moderate score, highlighting the complexity of the cases. Median incision was 10 cm, operating time 123 minutes (IQR 102-151), and EBL 300 mL (IQR 100-550). Twenty-three (11.9%) received blood transfusions, and median LOS was 2 days. Predictors of LOS >2 days included age (OR 1.27, P = 0.003) and operating time (OR 1.12, P = 0.015). The 30-day complication rate was 18.1%, with predictors including tumor size (OR 1.14, P = 0.032) and transfusion (OR 3.04, P = 0.031). Median eGFR decreased 34.1%, with no dialysis requirements.

Conclusions: msRN provides favorable outcomes, serving as a practical alternative to traditional and MIS approaches. Its documented utility supports the continued relevance of open surgical techniques for complex renal cases.

小肋下切口技术用于开放性根治性肾切除术:复杂肾肿块的实用选择。
目的:描述开放式小肋下切口根治性肾切除术技术(msRN),并评估肾功能、围手术期和肿瘤预后,作为传统或微创肾切除术治疗复杂肾肿块的替代方法。本研究旨在记录msRN方法,强调其在保留开放肾切除术技能方面的价值。方法:回顾性分析2013 ~ 2016年接受msRN手术的患者。在肋缘和第11根肋骨之间切开8 - 12 cm切口,所有患者均采用快速恢复途径。分析临床病理、围手术期和肾功能指标。统计分析采用单变量和多变量logistic回归分析住院时间(LOS)、2天及30天并发症的预测因素。结果:193例患者(中位年龄59.5,IQR为58.4-68.8),中位肿瘤大小为7.2 cm (IQR为5.0-9.6),67.9%患者≥pT3。值得注意的是,56%的患者具有较高的R.E.N.A.L.肾测量评分,41.5%为中等评分,突出了病例的复杂性。正中切口10 cm,手术时间123分钟(IQR 102-151), EBL 300 mL (IQR 100-550)。23例(11.9%)接受输血,平均生存时间为2天。预测因素包括年龄(OR 1.27, P = 0.003)和手术时间(OR 1.12, P = 0.015)。30天并发症发生率为18.1%,预测因素包括肿瘤大小(OR 1.14, P = 0.032)和输血(OR 3.04, P = 0.031)。中位eGFR下降34.1%,不需要透析。结论:msRN提供了良好的结果,作为传统和MIS方法的实用替代方案。其记录的效用支持开放手术技术对复杂肾脏病例的持续相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信