Comparative Sedative Effects of Esketamine and Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexmedetomidine Alone in Patients Undergoing Spinal Tumor Surgery.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S515869
Chuanyan Lin, Liyong Yuan, Jun Shi, Lingsi Kong, Ni Luo, Jianlin Wang
{"title":"Comparative Sedative Effects of Esketamine and Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexmedetomidine Alone in Patients Undergoing Spinal Tumor Surgery.","authors":"Chuanyan Lin, Liyong Yuan, Jun Shi, Lingsi Kong, Ni Luo, Jianlin Wang","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S515869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Esketamine and dexmedetomidine are commonly used sedatives in surgery, which can result in minimal respiratory depression and analgesic activity. This study investigated the sedative effect of esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine on patients undergoing spinal tumor (ST) surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We did a retrospective analysis at the Anesthesiology Department of Ningbo City's the sixth Hospital. They studied 75 ST surgery patients who got esketamine in combination with dexmedetomidine (Group ED) between April 2022 and June 2024. In a 1:1 cohort, compare these individuals to those who only received dexmedetomidine at the same time period (Group D). The primary outcome is perioperative hemodynamic status. The secondary outcomes were pain intensity, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM), and the occurrence of adverse responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with group E, the group ED had lower mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and visual-analogue scale (VAS) scores after the start of surgery (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the waiting time for perioperative motor evoked potential (MEP) and the intensity of the first induced MEP current between the two groups (all P>0.05); The Group ED first induced MEP amplitude, somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitude, and MEP amplitude greater than the Group D, while SEP latency and MEP latency were smaller than the Group D (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with dexmedetomidine alone, the combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine during ST surgery can demonstrated superior sedation and pain control without increasing adverse event risk, making it a viable alternative for ST surgery anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":22977,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"21 ","pages":"747-755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12109598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S515869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Esketamine and dexmedetomidine are commonly used sedatives in surgery, which can result in minimal respiratory depression and analgesic activity. This study investigated the sedative effect of esketamine combined with dexmedetomidine on patients undergoing spinal tumor (ST) surgery.

Methods: We did a retrospective analysis at the Anesthesiology Department of Ningbo City's the sixth Hospital. They studied 75 ST surgery patients who got esketamine in combination with dexmedetomidine (Group ED) between April 2022 and June 2024. In a 1:1 cohort, compare these individuals to those who only received dexmedetomidine at the same time period (Group D). The primary outcome is perioperative hemodynamic status. The secondary outcomes were pain intensity, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM), and the occurrence of adverse responses.

Results: Compared with group E, the group ED had lower mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and visual-analogue scale (VAS) scores after the start of surgery (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the waiting time for perioperative motor evoked potential (MEP) and the intensity of the first induced MEP current between the two groups (all P>0.05); The Group ED first induced MEP amplitude, somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) amplitude, and MEP amplitude greater than the Group D, while SEP latency and MEP latency were smaller than the Group D (all P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Compared with dexmedetomidine alone, the combination of esketamine and dexmedetomidine during ST surgery can demonstrated superior sedation and pain control without increasing adverse event risk, making it a viable alternative for ST surgery anesthesia.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

艾氯胺酮联合右美托咪定与单用右美托咪定在脊柱肿瘤手术中的镇静效果比较。
目的:艾氯胺酮和右美托咪定是手术中常用的镇静药,可引起最小的呼吸抑制和镇痛活性。本研究探讨艾氯胺酮联合右美托咪定对脊柱肿瘤手术患者的镇静作用。方法:对宁波市第六医院麻醉科的临床资料进行回顾性分析。他们研究了在2022年4月至2024年6月期间接受艾氯胺酮和右美托咪定(ED组)联合治疗的75名ST手术患者。在1:1的队列中,将这些个体与同期仅接受右美托咪定的个体(D组)进行比较。主要结果是围手术期血流动力学状态。次要结果为疼痛强度、术中神经生理监测(IONM)和不良反应的发生。结果:与E组比较,ED组术后平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)均低于E组(均P0.05);ED组首先诱导MEP振幅、体感诱发电位(SEP)振幅和MEP振幅均大于D组,SEP潜伏期和MEP潜伏期均小于D组(均P0.05)。结论:与单用右美托咪定相比,艾氯胺酮联合右美托咪定在ST手术中具有更好的镇静和疼痛控制效果,且不增加不良事件风险,是ST手术麻醉的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信