Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-24 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_16_25
Hamidreza Namvar, Fatemeh Espahbodi, Mahmood Moosazadeh, Seyyed Mobin Rahimnia, Narjes Hendouei
{"title":"Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Mirtazapine in the Treatment of Uremic Pruritus in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.","authors":"Hamidreza Namvar, Fatemeh Espahbodi, Mahmood Moosazadeh, Seyyed Mobin Rahimnia, Narjes Hendouei","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_16_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Uremic pruritus (UP) is a prevalent and debilitating condition experienced by patients undergoing hemodialysis, influenced by multiple underlying mechanisms. Despite the availability of various treatment options, many patients still endure significant pruritus. This double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial aims to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of mirtazapine and hydroxyzine in treating UP and improving sleep quality in hemodialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven patients in the mirtazapine group received 15 mg/night (7.5 mg for the first two nights) with a hydroxyzine placebo, while 28 patients in the hydroxyzine group received 25 mg/night (12.5 mg for the first two nights) with a mirtazapine placebo for 2 weeks. UP was assessed using the 5D-itch scale, and sleep quality was measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline, weeks 2, 3, and 4. Adverse effects were recorded using the Antidepressant Side Effect Checklist at each visit from baseline to week 2.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>UP ratings based on the 5D-itch scale decreased for both groups, with a more significant reduction in the mirtazapine group (<i>P</i> = 0.04). The mirtazapine group also showed a significant improvement in the PSQI compared to hydroxyzine (<i>P</i> = 0.01). Dry mouth was the only notable adverse effect, occurring more frequently in the mirtazapine group (<i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that short-term treatment with mirtazapine is more effective than hydroxyzine in reducing the severity of UP and improving sleep quality for patients undergoing hemodialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"13 4","pages":"127-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12105765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_16_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Uremic pruritus (UP) is a prevalent and debilitating condition experienced by patients undergoing hemodialysis, influenced by multiple underlying mechanisms. Despite the availability of various treatment options, many patients still endure significant pruritus. This double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial aims to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of mirtazapine and hydroxyzine in treating UP and improving sleep quality in hemodialysis patients.

Methods: Twenty-seven patients in the mirtazapine group received 15 mg/night (7.5 mg for the first two nights) with a hydroxyzine placebo, while 28 patients in the hydroxyzine group received 25 mg/night (12.5 mg for the first two nights) with a mirtazapine placebo for 2 weeks. UP was assessed using the 5D-itch scale, and sleep quality was measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at baseline, weeks 2, 3, and 4. Adverse effects were recorded using the Antidepressant Side Effect Checklist at each visit from baseline to week 2.

Findings: UP ratings based on the 5D-itch scale decreased for both groups, with a more significant reduction in the mirtazapine group (P = 0.04). The mirtazapine group also showed a significant improvement in the PSQI compared to hydroxyzine (P = 0.01). Dry mouth was the only notable adverse effect, occurring more frequently in the mirtazapine group (P = 0.02).

Conclusion: This study suggests that short-term treatment with mirtazapine is more effective than hydroxyzine in reducing the severity of UP and improving sleep quality for patients undergoing hemodialysis.

米氮平治疗血液透析患者尿毒症性瘙痒的疗效和安全性评价:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验。
目的:尿毒症性瘙痒(UP)是血液透析患者常见的一种衰弱性疾病,受多种潜在机制的影响。尽管有各种治疗选择,许多患者仍然忍受明显的瘙痒。本双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验旨在评估和比较米氮平和羟嗪治疗血液透析患者UP和改善睡眠质量的安全性和有效性。方法:米氮平组27例患者接受15 mg/夜(前两晚7.5 mg)羟嗪安慰剂治疗,羟嗪组28例患者接受25 mg/夜(前两晚12.5 mg)米氮平安慰剂治疗,疗程2周。使用5d瘙痒量表评估UP,并在基线、第2周、第3周和第4周使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)测量睡眠质量。从基线到第2周,每次就诊时使用抗抑郁药副作用检查表记录不良反应。结果:两组基于5d瘙痒量表的UP评分均下降,米氮平组的下降更为显著(P = 0.04)。与羟嗪组相比,米氮平组PSQI也有显著改善(P = 0.01)。口干是唯一显著的不良反应,在米氮平组发生的频率更高(P = 0.02)。结论:本研究提示短期应用米氮平比羟嗪更能有效降低血液透析患者UP的严重程度和改善睡眠质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信