Tyler Thorne, Makoa Mau, Lucas Marchand, Justin M Haller
{"title":"Maximum Compressive Forces of Rescue Screws with Varying Diameters and Thread Patterns in Synthetic Osteoporotic and Normal Bone Models.","authors":"Tyler Thorne, Makoa Mau, Lucas Marchand, Justin M Haller","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>\"Rescue screws\" are used to address screw stripping during fracture fixation. Bone screw fasteners (BSF; Osteocentric Technologies) have a thread pattern that may enhance purchase. This study compared maximum compressive forces of traditional buttress screws (TBS; Stryker) and BSF in rescue/lag modes using synthetic models of osteoporotic and normal bone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2.7-mm TBS screws were placed in lag mode and the maximum compression force prior to stripping was measured. Rescue screws, varied by screw type and diameter, were placed in lag mode through previously stripped lag holes, using appropriate glide holes in the proximal cortex and the maximum compression force prior to stripping was measured. Force differences were compared between the stripped 2.7-mm TBS screws, and each rescue screws (3.5-mm TBS, 2.7-mm BSF, and 3.5-mm BSF). Trials were conducted on two synthetic-layered biomechanical models, a synthetic 20-10 pound-per-cubic-foot (PCF) osteoporotic model and a 40-30 PCF normal bone density model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2.7-mm rescue BSF produced similar compression to the original 2.7-mm TBS lag screw (BSF-501.0 N vs TBS-577.0 N, p=0.441) in normal bone, but lower compression in osteoporotic bone (61.0 N vs 104.0 N, p=0.001). 3.5-mm TBS and BSF rescue screws increased the amount of compression in osteoporotic bone (3.5-mm TBS vs 2.7-mm BSF: 136.0 N (16.4) vs 61.0 N (14.5); 3.5mm BSF vs 2.7-mm BSF: 198.4 N (4.2) vs 61.0 N (14.5) p<0.001) and in normal bone (3.5-mm TBS vs 2.7-mm BSF: 968.0 N (30.3) vs 501.0 N (197.7); 3.5-mm BSF vs 2.7-mm BSF: 1136.0 N (51.2) vs 501.0 N (197.7) p<0.001) versus 2.7-mm rescue screws.3.5-mm rescue BSF produced more compression than 3.5-mm TBS (198.4 N (4.2) vs 136.0 N (16.3), p<0.001) in osteoporotic bone, but not in normal bone (1136.0 N (51.2) vs 968.0 N (30.3), p=0.106).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After stripping of a 2.7-mm Traditional Buttress Screw (TBS), 3.5-mm rescue TBS and Bone screw fasteners (BSF) generated more compressive force than the original lag screws in both normal and osteoporotic surrogate bone. 2.7-mm rescue BSF provided similar compression as the original lag screw in normal bone, but not osteoporotic bone. Depending on bone quality, surgeons can use different rescue screws to obtain similar or more fracture compression and construct stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: "Rescue screws" are used to address screw stripping during fracture fixation. Bone screw fasteners (BSF; Osteocentric Technologies) have a thread pattern that may enhance purchase. This study compared maximum compressive forces of traditional buttress screws (TBS; Stryker) and BSF in rescue/lag modes using synthetic models of osteoporotic and normal bone.
Methods: 2.7-mm TBS screws were placed in lag mode and the maximum compression force prior to stripping was measured. Rescue screws, varied by screw type and diameter, were placed in lag mode through previously stripped lag holes, using appropriate glide holes in the proximal cortex and the maximum compression force prior to stripping was measured. Force differences were compared between the stripped 2.7-mm TBS screws, and each rescue screws (3.5-mm TBS, 2.7-mm BSF, and 3.5-mm BSF). Trials were conducted on two synthetic-layered biomechanical models, a synthetic 20-10 pound-per-cubic-foot (PCF) osteoporotic model and a 40-30 PCF normal bone density model.
Results: 2.7-mm rescue BSF produced similar compression to the original 2.7-mm TBS lag screw (BSF-501.0 N vs TBS-577.0 N, p=0.441) in normal bone, but lower compression in osteoporotic bone (61.0 N vs 104.0 N, p=0.001). 3.5-mm TBS and BSF rescue screws increased the amount of compression in osteoporotic bone (3.5-mm TBS vs 2.7-mm BSF: 136.0 N (16.4) vs 61.0 N (14.5); 3.5mm BSF vs 2.7-mm BSF: 198.4 N (4.2) vs 61.0 N (14.5) p<0.001) and in normal bone (3.5-mm TBS vs 2.7-mm BSF: 968.0 N (30.3) vs 501.0 N (197.7); 3.5-mm BSF vs 2.7-mm BSF: 1136.0 N (51.2) vs 501.0 N (197.7) p<0.001) versus 2.7-mm rescue screws.3.5-mm rescue BSF produced more compression than 3.5-mm TBS (198.4 N (4.2) vs 136.0 N (16.3), p<0.001) in osteoporotic bone, but not in normal bone (1136.0 N (51.2) vs 968.0 N (30.3), p=0.106).
Conclusions: After stripping of a 2.7-mm Traditional Buttress Screw (TBS), 3.5-mm rescue TBS and Bone screw fasteners (BSF) generated more compressive force than the original lag screws in both normal and osteoporotic surrogate bone. 2.7-mm rescue BSF provided similar compression as the original lag screw in normal bone, but not osteoporotic bone. Depending on bone quality, surgeons can use different rescue screws to obtain similar or more fracture compression and construct stability.
目的:“救援螺钉”用于解决骨折固定过程中螺钉脱落的问题。骨螺钉紧固件(BSF;骨中心技术(Osteocentric Technologies)有一种螺纹模式,可以提高购买量。本研究比较了传统支撑螺钉(TBS;Stryker)和BSF在救援/滞后模式下使用骨质疏松和正常骨合成模型。方法:将2.7 mm TBS螺钉以滞后方式放置,测量脱模前的最大压缩力。根据螺钉类型和直径的不同,通过先前剥离的延迟孔以延迟模式放置救援螺钉,在近端皮质中使用适当的滑动孔,并测量剥离前的最大压缩力。比较剥离后的2.7 mm TBS螺钉与各救援螺钉(3.5 mm TBS、2.7 mm BSF和3.5 mm BSF)的受力差异。试验在两种合成层状生物力学模型上进行,一种是合成20-10磅/立方英尺(PCF)骨质疏松模型,另一种是合成40-30磅/立方英尺正常骨密度模型。结果:2.7 mm救援BSF在正常骨中产生与原始2.7 mm TBS拉力螺钉相似的压力(BSF-501.0 N vs TBS-577.0 N, p=0.441),但在骨质疏松性骨中产生较低的压力(61.0 N vs 104.0 N, p=0.001)。3.5 mm TBS和BSF救援螺钉增加了骨质疏松性骨的压迫量(3.5 mm TBS vs 2.7 mm BSF: 136.0 N (16.4) vs 61.0 N (14.5);3.5mm BSF vs 2.7 mm BSF: 198.4 N (4.2) vs 61.0 N(14.5)结论:在剥离2.7 mm传统支撑螺钉(TBS)后,3.5mm救援TBS和骨螺钉紧固件(BSF)在正常和骨质疏松的替代骨中产生的压缩力比原始拉力螺钉大。2.7 mm救援BSF在正常骨中提供与原始拉力螺钉相似的压迫,但在骨质疏松的骨中没有。根据骨质量的不同,外科医生可以使用不同的救援螺钉来获得相似或更多的骨折压迫和构建稳定性。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.