Mithila Zaheen, Fardin Ferdous, Anjalee T Amarasekera, Johannes Petutschnigg, Frank Edelmann, Timothy C Tan
{"title":"Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mithila Zaheen, Fardin Ferdous, Anjalee T Amarasekera, Johannes Petutschnigg, Frank Edelmann, Timothy C Tan","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex clinical syndrome with limited therapeutic options. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but their use in patients with HFpEF remains controversial. The aim of this review is to evaluate whether the use of MRAs improves diastolic function, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with HFpEF. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic literature search of scientific databases was performed to identify studies comparing the use of MRAs to placebo or no treatment in adult patients with HFpEF (2000-2024; English; PROSPERO registration CRD42022300783). Data were meta-analysed using a random-effects model for overall effect size measured as the standardised mean difference. <b>Results</b>: Pooled data revealed a significant benefit of MRA use compared to the control in decreasing E/e' (SMD -0.21; 95% CI: -0.33 to -0.10, <i>p</i> = 0.00), with greater improvement seen with longer duration of treatment. A substantial reduction in systolic blood pressure (SMD -0.27; 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.02, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and diastolic blood pressure (SMD -0.18; 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.01) was also noted. There was no significant difference in the 6 min walk distance, peak exercise capacity, or quality-of-life measures. Adverse events such as hyperkalaemia and worsening renal function were frequently reported in the MRA group. <b>Conclusions</b>: MRAs improve echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function and BP control; however, this did not translate into clinical outcomes of improved functional capacity or quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex clinical syndrome with limited therapeutic options. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but their use in patients with HFpEF remains controversial. The aim of this review is to evaluate whether the use of MRAs improves diastolic function, functional capacity, and quality of life in patients with HFpEF. Methods: A systematic literature search of scientific databases was performed to identify studies comparing the use of MRAs to placebo or no treatment in adult patients with HFpEF (2000-2024; English; PROSPERO registration CRD42022300783). Data were meta-analysed using a random-effects model for overall effect size measured as the standardised mean difference. Results: Pooled data revealed a significant benefit of MRA use compared to the control in decreasing E/e' (SMD -0.21; 95% CI: -0.33 to -0.10, p = 0.00), with greater improvement seen with longer duration of treatment. A substantial reduction in systolic blood pressure (SMD -0.27; 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.02, p = 0.03) and diastolic blood pressure (SMD -0.18; 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.04, p = 0.01) was also noted. There was no significant difference in the 6 min walk distance, peak exercise capacity, or quality-of-life measures. Adverse events such as hyperkalaemia and worsening renal function were frequently reported in the MRA group. Conclusions: MRAs improve echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function and BP control; however, this did not translate into clinical outcomes of improved functional capacity or quality of life.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals.
Unique features of this journal:
manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes.
There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.