Evidence for the Necessity of Objective Hearing Tests in Cochlear Implantation Assessment: Excluding Functional Hearing Loss Cases.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Anita Gáborján, Márton Kondé, Marianna Küstel, Nóra Kecskeméti, László Tamás, Ildikó Baranyi, Gábor Polony, Judit F Szigeti
{"title":"Evidence for the Necessity of Objective Hearing Tests in Cochlear Implantation Assessment: Excluding Functional Hearing Loss Cases.","authors":"Anita Gáborján, Márton Kondé, Marianna Küstel, Nóra Kecskeméti, László Tamás, Ildikó Baranyi, Gábor Polony, Judit F Szigeti","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Cochlear implantation is a crucial intervention for individuals with severe hearing loss, aiming to restore auditory function and improve quality of life. The decision to recommend cochlear implantation critically depends on accurate audiological evaluations. However, challenges arise when subjective assessments of hearing loss do not align with objective audiological measurements, leading to potential misdiagnoses. Comparisons are to be made between subjective and objective results, with an investigation into the characteristics, warning signs, and risk factors of functional hearing loss (FHL). <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective study of hearing loss presentations at an otorhinolaryngological university clinic between 2020 and 2024 was performed, whereby we collected FHL cases. The evaluation process included measurements of subjectively perceived hearing loss through pure-tone audiometry, speech understanding, and communication testing. The objective assessments comprised impedance measurement, otoacoustic emission measurement, auditory brainstem responses, auditory steady-state responses, and medical imaging. <b>Results</b>: During the studied period, 11 patients, with an average age of 35.2 years (13 to 64 years), who were originally referred for cochlear implantation evaluation and subsequently diagnosed with FHL, were identified. The majority (10 patients) were female. No organic cause was identified in four cases, while seven cases exhibited some organic ear abnormalities insufficient to justify the reported hearing loss. The degree of FHL ranged from 30 dB to 90 dB, with an average of 60 dB. <b>Conclusions</b>: Diagnosing FHL is challenging and requires comprehensive assessment and interdisciplinary collaboration. Failure to recognize it may lead to inappropriate treatment, including unnecessary cochlear implantation. This study advocates for the mandatory integration of ABR and ASSR in the clinical evaluation of all cochlear implant candidates to ensure accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103585","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cochlear implantation is a crucial intervention for individuals with severe hearing loss, aiming to restore auditory function and improve quality of life. The decision to recommend cochlear implantation critically depends on accurate audiological evaluations. However, challenges arise when subjective assessments of hearing loss do not align with objective audiological measurements, leading to potential misdiagnoses. Comparisons are to be made between subjective and objective results, with an investigation into the characteristics, warning signs, and risk factors of functional hearing loss (FHL). Methods: A retrospective study of hearing loss presentations at an otorhinolaryngological university clinic between 2020 and 2024 was performed, whereby we collected FHL cases. The evaluation process included measurements of subjectively perceived hearing loss through pure-tone audiometry, speech understanding, and communication testing. The objective assessments comprised impedance measurement, otoacoustic emission measurement, auditory brainstem responses, auditory steady-state responses, and medical imaging. Results: During the studied period, 11 patients, with an average age of 35.2 years (13 to 64 years), who were originally referred for cochlear implantation evaluation and subsequently diagnosed with FHL, were identified. The majority (10 patients) were female. No organic cause was identified in four cases, while seven cases exhibited some organic ear abnormalities insufficient to justify the reported hearing loss. The degree of FHL ranged from 30 dB to 90 dB, with an average of 60 dB. Conclusions: Diagnosing FHL is challenging and requires comprehensive assessment and interdisciplinary collaboration. Failure to recognize it may lead to inappropriate treatment, including unnecessary cochlear implantation. This study advocates for the mandatory integration of ABR and ASSR in the clinical evaluation of all cochlear implant candidates to ensure accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment.

人工耳蜗植入评估中客观听力测试必要性的证据:排除功能性听力损失病例。
背景/目的:人工耳蜗植入术是重度听力损失患者的重要干预手段,旨在恢复听力功能,提高生活质量。建议人工耳蜗植入的决定主要取决于准确的听力学评估。然而,当听力损失的主观评估与客观听力学测量不一致时,就会出现挑战,导致潜在的误诊。比较主客观结果,探讨功能性听力损失(FHL)的特点、预警信号和危险因素。方法:回顾性研究2020年至2024年在某耳鼻喉科大学门诊就诊的听力损失病例,收集FHL病例。评估过程包括通过纯音测听、言语理解和沟通测试测量主观感知的听力损失。客观评估包括阻抗测量、耳声发射测量、听觉脑干反应、听觉稳态反应和医学成像。结果:在研究期间,共发现11例患者,平均年龄为35.2岁(13 ~ 64岁),这些患者最初被转诊进行人工耳蜗植入评估,随后被诊断为FHL。女性占多数(10例)。4例未发现器质性原因,而7例表现出一些器质性耳部异常,不足以证明报告的听力损失。FHL程度在30 ~ 90 dB之间,平均为60 dB。结论:FHL的诊断具有挑战性,需要综合评估和跨学科合作。未能认识到它可能导致不适当的治疗,包括不必要的人工耳蜗植入。本研究提倡在所有人工耳蜗候选患者的临床评估中强制整合ABR和ASSR,以确保准确诊断和最佳治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信