Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treating Late-Life Depression: A Scoping Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ciprian-Ionuț Băcilă, Monica Cornea, Andrei Lomnasan, Claudia Elena Anghel, Andreea Maria Grama, Cristina Elena Dobre, Silvia Rusu, Bogdan Ioan Vintilă
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treating Late-Life Depression: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ciprian-Ionuț Băcilă, Monica Cornea, Andrei Lomnasan, Claudia Elena Anghel, Andreea Maria Grama, Cristina Elena Dobre, Silvia Rusu, Bogdan Ioan Vintilă","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive and well-tolerated treatment, offering an effective alternative for elderly patients with depression, especially when side effects or comorbidities limit medication. <b>Methods</b>: This scoping review analyzes 16 studies published over the past seven years, to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical applications of TMS in older adults with depression. <b>Results</b>: The review examines various TMS modalities, including repetitive TMS (rTMS), deep TMS, and theta burst stimulation (TBS), with most protocols targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Adverse effects were rare, mild, and transient, supporting the treatment's safety profile. Pharmacological co-treatment was common but not essential for clinical improvement, highlighting TMS's potential as a standalone therapy. A subset of studies used neuroplasticity (SICI, ICF, CSP) or neuroimaging measures (MRI and MRI-based neuronavigation), revealing that age-related cortical inhibition may limit plasticity rather than depression itself. <b>Conclusions</b>: Overall, TMS demonstrates promising effectiveness and tolerability in managing late-life depression. Across studies, remission rates varied from 20% to 63%, with higher efficacy generally observed in bilateral stimulation or high-frequency protocols. Standardization of protocols and further research into individualized targeting and long-term outcomes are warranted to support broader clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103609","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive and well-tolerated treatment, offering an effective alternative for elderly patients with depression, especially when side effects or comorbidities limit medication. Methods: This scoping review analyzes 16 studies published over the past seven years, to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and clinical applications of TMS in older adults with depression. Results: The review examines various TMS modalities, including repetitive TMS (rTMS), deep TMS, and theta burst stimulation (TBS), with most protocols targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Adverse effects were rare, mild, and transient, supporting the treatment's safety profile. Pharmacological co-treatment was common but not essential for clinical improvement, highlighting TMS's potential as a standalone therapy. A subset of studies used neuroplasticity (SICI, ICF, CSP) or neuroimaging measures (MRI and MRI-based neuronavigation), revealing that age-related cortical inhibition may limit plasticity rather than depression itself. Conclusions: Overall, TMS demonstrates promising effectiveness and tolerability in managing late-life depression. Across studies, remission rates varied from 20% to 63%, with higher efficacy generally observed in bilateral stimulation or high-frequency protocols. Standardization of protocols and further research into individualized targeting and long-term outcomes are warranted to support broader clinical adoption.

经颅磁刺激治疗老年抑郁症的有效性和安全性:一项范围综述。
背景/目的:经颅磁刺激(TMS)是一种无创且耐受性良好的治疗方法,为老年抑郁症患者提供了一种有效的替代方法,特别是当副作用或合并症限制了药物治疗时。方法:本综述分析了过去7年中发表的16项研究,以评估经颅磁刺激在老年抑郁症患者中的疗效、安全性和临床应用。结果:该综述研究了多种经颅磁刺激方式,包括重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、深度经颅磁刺激(deep TMS)和θ波爆发刺激(TBS),大多数方案针对背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)。副作用是罕见的,轻微的,短暂的,支持治疗的安全性。药物联合治疗是常见的,但不是临床改善所必需的,突出了经颅磁刺激作为单独治疗的潜力。一部分研究使用神经可塑性(SICI, ICF, CSP)或神经成像测量(MRI和基于MRI的神经导航),揭示与年龄相关的皮层抑制可能限制可塑性,而不是抑郁症本身。结论:总的来说,经颅磁刺激在治疗晚期抑郁症方面显示出良好的有效性和耐受性。在所有研究中,缓解率从20%到63%不等,双侧刺激或高频方案通常观察到更高的疗效。标准化的方案和进一步研究个体化的目标和长期结果是必要的,以支持更广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信