Comparative Outcomes of Amblyopia Treatment in High Astigmatism: Stability and Sustained Improvements.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chia-Chen Hsu, Lung-Chi Lee, Hsu-Chieh Chang, Chun-Hao Huang, Ke-Hung Chien
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Amblyopia Treatment in High Astigmatism: Stability and Sustained Improvements.","authors":"Chia-Chen Hsu, Lung-Chi Lee, Hsu-Chieh Chang, Chun-Hao Huang, Ke-Hung Chien","doi":"10.3390/jcm14103577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Astigmatism is a major risk factor for amblyopia. While optical correction improves visual acuity (VA), the long-term treatment outcomes, particularly in children with high astigmatism, remain understudied. This study aimed to determine the treatment effects, time course, and visual outcomes in children aged 3-7 years with high astigmatism and compared their VA improvement with those with low astigmatism. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included 63 children with untreated high with-the-rule astigmatism (≥+2.50 diopters [D]) and 46 with low astigmatism (≤1.50 D). The children with high astigmatism were classified based on their baseline best-corrected VA (BCVA) into good-VA (20/25 or better, <i>n</i> = 24), mild-VA-impairment (20/25-20/40, <i>n</i> = 19), and amblyopia (20/40 or worse, <i>n</i> = 20) groups. The primary outcomes include maximal improvement in mean BCVA post treatment, the cumulative probability of achieving a VA of 20/25 or better, and being within one line of the fellow eye. <b>Results</b>: The amblyopia, mild-VA-impairment, good-VA, and low astigmatism control groups showed mean improvements of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution of 0.36 ± 0.08, 0.15 ± 0.05, 0.03 ± 0.04, and 0.01 ± 0.04, respectively. Post treatment with optical correction and/or patching over a mean duration of 46.61 ± 35.22 weeks, amblyopia resolved in all affected children. In the mild-VA-impairment group, only one child did not respond successfully to the treatment. The mean final VA showed no significant intergroup differences (<i>p</i> = 0.115). No amblyopia recurrence was observed at a mean follow-up of 118.33 weeks post resolution. <b>Conclusions</b>: Timely optical correction and patching effectively improve VA in children with high astigmatism, achieving outcomes comparable to those with low astigmatism.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12112649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Astigmatism is a major risk factor for amblyopia. While optical correction improves visual acuity (VA), the long-term treatment outcomes, particularly in children with high astigmatism, remain understudied. This study aimed to determine the treatment effects, time course, and visual outcomes in children aged 3-7 years with high astigmatism and compared their VA improvement with those with low astigmatism. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 63 children with untreated high with-the-rule astigmatism (≥+2.50 diopters [D]) and 46 with low astigmatism (≤1.50 D). The children with high astigmatism were classified based on their baseline best-corrected VA (BCVA) into good-VA (20/25 or better, n = 24), mild-VA-impairment (20/25-20/40, n = 19), and amblyopia (20/40 or worse, n = 20) groups. The primary outcomes include maximal improvement in mean BCVA post treatment, the cumulative probability of achieving a VA of 20/25 or better, and being within one line of the fellow eye. Results: The amblyopia, mild-VA-impairment, good-VA, and low astigmatism control groups showed mean improvements of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution of 0.36 ± 0.08, 0.15 ± 0.05, 0.03 ± 0.04, and 0.01 ± 0.04, respectively. Post treatment with optical correction and/or patching over a mean duration of 46.61 ± 35.22 weeks, amblyopia resolved in all affected children. In the mild-VA-impairment group, only one child did not respond successfully to the treatment. The mean final VA showed no significant intergroup differences (p = 0.115). No amblyopia recurrence was observed at a mean follow-up of 118.33 weeks post resolution. Conclusions: Timely optical correction and patching effectively improve VA in children with high astigmatism, achieving outcomes comparable to those with low astigmatism.

高度散光弱视治疗的比较结果:稳定性和持续改善。
背景/目的:散光是弱视的主要危险因素。虽然光学矫正可以改善视力(VA),但长期治疗效果,特别是对高度散光儿童的治疗效果,仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在确定3-7岁高度散光儿童的治疗效果、时间过程和视力结果,并将其与低散光儿童的视力改善进行比较。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入63例未经治疗的高散光患儿(≥+2.50屈光度[D])和46例低散光患儿(≤1.50 D)。根据基线最佳矫正视力(BCVA)将高度散光患儿分为良好(20/25或更好,n = 24)、轻度VA损害(20/25-20/40,n = 19)和弱视(20/40或更差,n = 20)组。主要结局包括治疗后平均BCVA的最大改善,VA达到20/25或更好的累积概率,以及在同侧眼的一条线内。结果:弱视、轻度va损害、良好va和低散光对照组的最小分辨角的对数平均改善分别为0.36±0.08、0.15±0.05、0.03±0.04和0.01±0.04。在平均46.61±35.22周的时间内,经过光学矫正和/或贴片治疗后,所有受影响儿童的弱视都得到了解决。在轻度va损伤组中,只有一个孩子对治疗没有成功反应。平均最终VA组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.115)。解决后平均随访118.33周,无弱视复发。结论:及时的光学矫正和补片能有效改善高散光患儿的视静脉曲张,其效果与低散光患儿相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信