{"title":"Improved Prediction Accuracy for Late-Onset Preeclampsia Using cfRNA Profiles: A Comparative Study of Marker Selection Strategies.","authors":"Akiha Nakano, Kohei Uno, Yusuke Matsui","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13101162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Late-onset pre-eclampsia (LO-PE) remains difficult to predict because placental angiogenic markers perform poorly once maternal cardiometabolic factors dominate. <b>Methods</b>: We reanalyzed a publicly available cell-free RNA (cfRNA) cohort (12 EO-PE, 12 LO-PE, and 24 matched controls). After RNA-seq normalization, we derived LO-PE candidate genes using (i) differential expression and (ii) elastic-net feature selection. Predictive accuracy was assessed with nested Monte-Carlo cross-validation (10 × 70/30 outer splits; 5-fold inner grid-search for λ). <b>Results</b>: The best LO-PE elastic-net model achieved a mean ± SD AUROC of 0.88 ± 0.08 and F1 of 0.73 ± 0.17-substantially higher than an EO-derived baseline applied to the same samples (AUROC ≈ 0.69). Enrichment analysis highlighted immune-tolerance and metabolic pathways; three genes (HLA-G, IL17RB, and KLRC4) recurred across >50% of cross-validation repeats. <b>Conclusions</b>: Plasma cfRNA signatures can outperform existing EO-based screens for LO-PE and nominate biologically plausible markers of immune and metabolic dysregulation. Because the present dataset is small (n = 48) and underpowered for single-gene claims, external validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is essential before clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Late-onset pre-eclampsia (LO-PE) remains difficult to predict because placental angiogenic markers perform poorly once maternal cardiometabolic factors dominate. Methods: We reanalyzed a publicly available cell-free RNA (cfRNA) cohort (12 EO-PE, 12 LO-PE, and 24 matched controls). After RNA-seq normalization, we derived LO-PE candidate genes using (i) differential expression and (ii) elastic-net feature selection. Predictive accuracy was assessed with nested Monte-Carlo cross-validation (10 × 70/30 outer splits; 5-fold inner grid-search for λ). Results: The best LO-PE elastic-net model achieved a mean ± SD AUROC of 0.88 ± 0.08 and F1 of 0.73 ± 0.17-substantially higher than an EO-derived baseline applied to the same samples (AUROC ≈ 0.69). Enrichment analysis highlighted immune-tolerance and metabolic pathways; three genes (HLA-G, IL17RB, and KLRC4) recurred across >50% of cross-validation repeats. Conclusions: Plasma cfRNA signatures can outperform existing EO-based screens for LO-PE and nominate biologically plausible markers of immune and metabolic dysregulation. Because the present dataset is small (n = 48) and underpowered for single-gene claims, external validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is essential before clinical translation.
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.