Improved Prediction Accuracy for Late-Onset Preeclampsia Using cfRNA Profiles: A Comparative Study of Marker Selection Strategies.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Akiha Nakano, Kohei Uno, Yusuke Matsui
{"title":"Improved Prediction Accuracy for Late-Onset Preeclampsia Using cfRNA Profiles: A Comparative Study of Marker Selection Strategies.","authors":"Akiha Nakano, Kohei Uno, Yusuke Matsui","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13101162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Late-onset pre-eclampsia (LO-PE) remains difficult to predict because placental angiogenic markers perform poorly once maternal cardiometabolic factors dominate. <b>Methods</b>: We reanalyzed a publicly available cell-free RNA (cfRNA) cohort (12 EO-PE, 12 LO-PE, and 24 matched controls). After RNA-seq normalization, we derived LO-PE candidate genes using (i) differential expression and (ii) elastic-net feature selection. Predictive accuracy was assessed with nested Monte-Carlo cross-validation (10 × 70/30 outer splits; 5-fold inner grid-search for λ). <b>Results</b>: The best LO-PE elastic-net model achieved a mean ± SD AUROC of 0.88 ± 0.08 and F1 of 0.73 ± 0.17-substantially higher than an EO-derived baseline applied to the same samples (AUROC ≈ 0.69). Enrichment analysis highlighted immune-tolerance and metabolic pathways; three genes (HLA-G, IL17RB, and KLRC4) recurred across >50% of cross-validation repeats. <b>Conclusions</b>: Plasma cfRNA signatures can outperform existing EO-based screens for LO-PE and nominate biologically plausible markers of immune and metabolic dysregulation. Because the present dataset is small (n = 48) and underpowered for single-gene claims, external validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is essential before clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12110820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Late-onset pre-eclampsia (LO-PE) remains difficult to predict because placental angiogenic markers perform poorly once maternal cardiometabolic factors dominate. Methods: We reanalyzed a publicly available cell-free RNA (cfRNA) cohort (12 EO-PE, 12 LO-PE, and 24 matched controls). After RNA-seq normalization, we derived LO-PE candidate genes using (i) differential expression and (ii) elastic-net feature selection. Predictive accuracy was assessed with nested Monte-Carlo cross-validation (10 × 70/30 outer splits; 5-fold inner grid-search for λ). Results: The best LO-PE elastic-net model achieved a mean ± SD AUROC of 0.88 ± 0.08 and F1 of 0.73 ± 0.17-substantially higher than an EO-derived baseline applied to the same samples (AUROC ≈ 0.69). Enrichment analysis highlighted immune-tolerance and metabolic pathways; three genes (HLA-G, IL17RB, and KLRC4) recurred across >50% of cross-validation repeats. Conclusions: Plasma cfRNA signatures can outperform existing EO-based screens for LO-PE and nominate biologically plausible markers of immune and metabolic dysregulation. Because the present dataset is small (n = 48) and underpowered for single-gene claims, external validation in larger, multicenter cohorts is essential before clinical translation.

使用cfRNA谱提高迟发性子痫前期预测准确性:标记选择策略的比较研究
背景:迟发性先兆子痫(LO-PE)仍然难以预测,因为一旦母体心脏代谢因子占主导地位,胎盘血管生成标志物表现不佳。方法:我们重新分析了一个公开的无细胞RNA (cfRNA)队列(12个EO-PE, 12个LO-PE和24个匹配的对照)。在RNA-seq归一化之后,我们使用(i)差异表达和(ii)弹性网络特征选择获得了LO-PE候选基因。采用嵌套蒙特卡罗交叉验证评估预测准确性(10 × 70/30外分割;λ)的5倍内网格搜索。结果:最佳LO-PE弹性网模型的平均±SD AUROC为0.88±0.08,F1为0.73±0.17,大大高于应用于相同样品的eo衍生基线(AUROC≈0.69)。富集分析强调免疫耐受和代谢途径;三个基因(HLA-G、IL17RB和KLRC4)在50%的交叉验证重复中复发。结论:血浆cfRNA标记可以优于现有的基于eo的LO-PE筛选,并指定生物学上合理的免疫和代谢失调标记。由于目前的数据集很小(n = 48),并且单基因声明的能力不足,因此在临床翻译之前,在更大的多中心队列中进行外部验证是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信