Archita P Desai, Eric S Orman, Tarek G Aridi, Timothy Stump, Lauren Nephew, Marwan S Ghabril, Michael Fallon, Naga Chalasani, Patrick Monahan
{"title":"Meaningful differences in patient-reported outcome measurement scores in liver disease.","authors":"Archita P Desai, Eric S Orman, Tarek G Aridi, Timothy Stump, Lauren Nephew, Marwan S Ghabril, Michael Fallon, Naga Chalasani, Patrick Monahan","doi":"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are being used more often in chronic liver disease (CLD) clinical care and research. Their interpretability can be greatly enhanced by establishing the smallest meaningful score difference (MSD). We report scores of commonly used PROMs and their MSDs in patients at different stages of liver disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 Profile, Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) v1.0 scores were aggregated from 2442 adults with CLD at 4 different stages: inpatients with decompensated cirrhosis (n=1146) and outpatients with cirrhosis (n=677) or CLD (n=128) or recipients of liver transplant (LT, n=490) between June 2014 and April 2023 from 3 academic centers. MSDs were estimated using distribution and anchor-based methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample's median age was 60.0 (IQR: 51.0-66.0); 55% were male, 17% Hispanic, 84% White, and 49% college educated. The etiology of CLD was alcohol in 36%, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in 31%, and viral hepatitis B/C in 26%. Median PROMIS domain scores were generally lowest in inpatients and highest after transplant. For PROMIS, distribution-based and anchor-based MSDs ranged from 3 to 4 for individual domains and 4 to 6 for summary scores. Distribution-based MSDs were 1 for CLDQ and ranged from 7 to 11 for individual SF-36 domains, except role limitations domains, which ranged from 15 to 18, and component scores, which were 3. When compared across stages of liver disease, PROMIS MSDs were generally similar, although they tended to be 0.5-1.0 points smaller in the decompensated population compared to the stable populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides data-driven recommendations for MSDs, enhancing the interpretability of commonly used PROMs in liver disease and facilitating the integration of PROMs in various clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12978,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Communications","volume":"9 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000727","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are being used more often in chronic liver disease (CLD) clinical care and research. Their interpretability can be greatly enhanced by establishing the smallest meaningful score difference (MSD). We report scores of commonly used PROMs and their MSDs in patients at different stages of liver disease.
Methods: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-29 Profile, Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) v1.0 scores were aggregated from 2442 adults with CLD at 4 different stages: inpatients with decompensated cirrhosis (n=1146) and outpatients with cirrhosis (n=677) or CLD (n=128) or recipients of liver transplant (LT, n=490) between June 2014 and April 2023 from 3 academic centers. MSDs were estimated using distribution and anchor-based methods.
Results: The study sample's median age was 60.0 (IQR: 51.0-66.0); 55% were male, 17% Hispanic, 84% White, and 49% college educated. The etiology of CLD was alcohol in 36%, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in 31%, and viral hepatitis B/C in 26%. Median PROMIS domain scores were generally lowest in inpatients and highest after transplant. For PROMIS, distribution-based and anchor-based MSDs ranged from 3 to 4 for individual domains and 4 to 6 for summary scores. Distribution-based MSDs were 1 for CLDQ and ranged from 7 to 11 for individual SF-36 domains, except role limitations domains, which ranged from 15 to 18, and component scores, which were 3. When compared across stages of liver disease, PROMIS MSDs were generally similar, although they tended to be 0.5-1.0 points smaller in the decompensated population compared to the stable populations.
Conclusions: This study provides data-driven recommendations for MSDs, enhancing the interpretability of commonly used PROMs in liver disease and facilitating the integration of PROMs in various clinical and research settings.
期刊介绍：
Hepatology Communications is a peer-reviewed, online-only, open access journal for fast dissemination of high quality basic, translational, and clinical research in hepatology. Hepatology Communications maintains high standard and rigorous peer review. Because of its open access nature, authors retain the copyright to their works, all articles are immediately available and free to read and share, and it is fully compliant with funder and institutional mandates. The journal is committed to fast publication and author satisfaction.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
