Comparative Evaluation of Natural Mouthrinses and Chlorhexidine in Dental Plaque Management: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ioana Elena Lile, Tareq Hajaj, Ioana Veja, Tiberiu Hosszu, Ligia Luminița Vaida, Liana Todor, Otilia Stana, Ramona-Amina Popovici, Diana Marian
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Natural Mouthrinses and Chlorhexidine in Dental Plaque Management: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Ioana Elena Lile, Tareq Hajaj, Ioana Veja, Tiberiu Hosszu, Ligia Luminița Vaida, Liana Todor, Otilia Stana, Ramona-Amina Popovici, Diana Marian","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13101181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> This study evaluated the efficacy of mouthrinses containing natural compounds-specifically, propolis and green tea extracts-in reducing bacterial dental plaque compared to a placebo and a 0.2% chlorhexidine rinse. We hypothesized that these natural compounds would significantly reduce plaque accumulation, with efficacy comparable to chlorhexidine. <b>Objective:</b> The objective was to evaluate the short-term efficacy of two natural mouthrinses-10% propolis and 5% green tea-compared to a placebo and 0.2% chlorhexidine in reducing dental plaque. <b>Trial Design:</b> The trial design was a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> In a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial, 60 healthy adult volunteers received a professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) and were then randomized into four groups (<i>n</i> = 15 each): a propolis mouthwash, a green tea mouthwash, a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash (positive control), and a placebo rinse. The participants rinsed twice daily for four weeks in addition to standard tooth brushing. The plaque levels were assessed using the Silness-Löe plaque index at baseline and after four weeks. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. <b>Results:</b> All groups had similar baseline plaque scores (≈2.5). After four weeks, the propolis and green tea groups showed significant reductions in plaque (mean indices of 1.02 and 1.12, respectively) compared to the placebo group (mean index = 2.01, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The chlorhexidine group achieved a mean plaque index of 0.90. The propolis rinse showed no significant difference from chlorhexidine (<i>p</i> = 0.40), indicating comparable efficacy. The green tea rinse had a slightly higher plaque index than chlorhexidine (<i>p</i> = 0.03). No significant adverse effects were reported. <b>Conclusions:</b> Mouthwashes containing 10% propolis or 5% green tea significantly reduced dental plaque, with propolis demonstrating efficacy comparable to 0.2% chlorhexidine.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12111160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study evaluated the efficacy of mouthrinses containing natural compounds-specifically, propolis and green tea extracts-in reducing bacterial dental plaque compared to a placebo and a 0.2% chlorhexidine rinse. We hypothesized that these natural compounds would significantly reduce plaque accumulation, with efficacy comparable to chlorhexidine. Objective: The objective was to evaluate the short-term efficacy of two natural mouthrinses-10% propolis and 5% green tea-compared to a placebo and 0.2% chlorhexidine in reducing dental plaque. Trial Design: The trial design was a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. Materials and Methods: In a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial, 60 healthy adult volunteers received a professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) and were then randomized into four groups (n = 15 each): a propolis mouthwash, a green tea mouthwash, a 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash (positive control), and a placebo rinse. The participants rinsed twice daily for four weeks in addition to standard tooth brushing. The plaque levels were assessed using the Silness-Löe plaque index at baseline and after four weeks. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Results: All groups had similar baseline plaque scores (≈2.5). After four weeks, the propolis and green tea groups showed significant reductions in plaque (mean indices of 1.02 and 1.12, respectively) compared to the placebo group (mean index = 2.01, p < 0.001). The chlorhexidine group achieved a mean plaque index of 0.90. The propolis rinse showed no significant difference from chlorhexidine (p = 0.40), indicating comparable efficacy. The green tea rinse had a slightly higher plaque index than chlorhexidine (p = 0.03). No significant adverse effects were reported. Conclusions: Mouthwashes containing 10% propolis or 5% green tea significantly reduced dental plaque, with propolis demonstrating efficacy comparable to 0.2% chlorhexidine.

天然漱口水和氯己定在牙菌斑管理中的比较评价:一项试点随机临床试验。
目的:本研究评估了含有天然化合物(特别是蜂胶和绿茶提取物)的漱口水与安慰剂和0.2%氯己定漱口水相比,在减少细菌牙菌斑方面的功效。我们假设这些天然化合物会显著减少斑块积聚,其疗效与氯己定相当。目的:目的是评估两种天然漱口水(10%蜂胶和5%绿茶)与安慰剂和0.2%氯己定在减少牙菌斑方面的短期疗效。试验设计:试验设计为随机、安慰剂对照、平行组临床试验,分配比例为1:1:1:1。材料与方法:在一项单盲、随机、对照试验中,60名健康成年志愿者接受了专业机械斑块清除(PMPR)治疗,然后随机分为四组(n = 15):蜂胶漱口水、绿茶漱口水、0.2%洗己定漱口水(阳性对照)和安慰剂漱口水。除了标准的刷牙外,参与者每天冲洗两次,持续四周。在基线和四周后使用Silness-Löe斑块指数评估斑块水平。采用方差分析和事后检验对数据进行分析(α = 0.05)。获得了伦理批准和知情同意。结果:所有组的基线斑块评分相似(≈2.5)。四周后,与安慰剂组(平均指数= 2.01,p < 0.001)相比,蜂胶组和绿茶组的斑块明显减少(平均指数分别为1.02和1.12)。氯己定组的平均斑块指数为0.90。蜂胶冲洗液与氯己定无显著差异(p = 0.40),疗效相当。绿茶冲洗液的菌斑指数略高于氯己定(p = 0.03)。没有明显的不良反应报告。结论:含10%蜂胶或5%绿茶的漱口水可显著减少牙菌斑,蜂胶的效果与0.2%氯己定相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信