Medicine Shortages: An Algorithm for Evaluating the Substitution with Equivalent or Alternative Products.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gabriele Caviglioli, Giuliana Drava, Laura Pivetta, Carmine Di Meco, Eugenia Livoti, Gabriella Paoli, Sara Baldassari, Giorgia Ailuno, Maria Paola Franchina, Alessandro Bonsignore, Domenico Di Giorgio, Barbara Rebesco
{"title":"Medicine Shortages: An Algorithm for Evaluating the Substitution with Equivalent or Alternative Products.","authors":"Gabriele Caviglioli, Giuliana Drava, Laura Pivetta, Carmine Di Meco, Eugenia Livoti, Gabriella Paoli, Sara Baldassari, Giorgia Ailuno, Maria Paola Franchina, Alessandro Bonsignore, Domenico Di Giorgio, Barbara Rebesco","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13101139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Drug shortages are a serious issue affecting health systems worldwide, determined by multiple causes including supply issues, regulatory limitations, and market distortions. The possible repercussions on patients may impair therapeutic efficacy. Despite numerous actions being implemented by regulatory authorities, including market monitoring, export restrictions, and temporary regulation mitigations, few instruments have been made available to help health operators find marketed alternatives to unavailable products. The aim of this work was to create an algorithm to find equivalent or alternative medicinal products available in a certain pharmaceutical market. Algorithm development and validation were performed using the medicinal products marketed in Italy. <b>Methods</b>: First, a newly assembled code, describing the active pharmaceutical ingredient by its Anatomical Therapeutical Chemical (ATC) code, and its dosage form by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) Standard Terms, was attributed to each marketed medicinal product. Then, the algorithm was set up to identify its possible equivalents or alternatives by assigning a score quantifying differences in Defined Daily Dose (DDD) per presentation unit and in characterizing Standard Terms. <b>Results</b>: The algorithm was validated on a randomized sample of medicinal products, proving to be able to identify appropriate equivalents or alternatives; moreover, it was tested in real conditions by submitting a survey to health professionals, who found this product to be reliable and useful. <b>Conclusions</b>: The developed algorithm may be employed as a rational tool to help health operators find solutions to drug shortages. This work highlighted some limits of the current ATC attribution that should be addressed by the competent authorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12111303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Drug shortages are a serious issue affecting health systems worldwide, determined by multiple causes including supply issues, regulatory limitations, and market distortions. The possible repercussions on patients may impair therapeutic efficacy. Despite numerous actions being implemented by regulatory authorities, including market monitoring, export restrictions, and temporary regulation mitigations, few instruments have been made available to help health operators find marketed alternatives to unavailable products. The aim of this work was to create an algorithm to find equivalent or alternative medicinal products available in a certain pharmaceutical market. Algorithm development and validation were performed using the medicinal products marketed in Italy. Methods: First, a newly assembled code, describing the active pharmaceutical ingredient by its Anatomical Therapeutical Chemical (ATC) code, and its dosage form by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) Standard Terms, was attributed to each marketed medicinal product. Then, the algorithm was set up to identify its possible equivalents or alternatives by assigning a score quantifying differences in Defined Daily Dose (DDD) per presentation unit and in characterizing Standard Terms. Results: The algorithm was validated on a randomized sample of medicinal products, proving to be able to identify appropriate equivalents or alternatives; moreover, it was tested in real conditions by submitting a survey to health professionals, who found this product to be reliable and useful. Conclusions: The developed algorithm may be employed as a rational tool to help health operators find solutions to drug shortages. This work highlighted some limits of the current ATC attribution that should be addressed by the competent authorities.

药品短缺:一种评估等效或替代产品替代的算法。
背景/目的:药物短缺是影响全球卫生系统的一个严重问题,由多种原因决定,包括供应问题、监管限制和市场扭曲。对患者可能产生的不良影响可能影响治疗效果。尽管监管当局正在采取许多行动,包括市场监测、出口限制和临时管制缓解措施,但几乎没有提供什么工具来帮助卫生经营者找到已上市的替代品,以替代无法获得的产品。这项工作的目的是创建一种算法,以找到在某一药品市场上可用的等效或替代药品。使用在意大利销售的药品进行算法开发和验证。方法:首先,一个新的汇编代码,通过其解剖治疗化学(ATC)代码描述活性药物成分,并通过欧洲药品和保健质量理事会(EDQM)标准术语描述其剂型,归属于每种上市药品。然后,通过分配分数来量化每个呈现单位的定义日剂量(DDD)和特征标准项的差异,建立算法以确定其可能的等价物或替代品。结果:该算法在药品的随机样本上进行了验证,证明能够识别适当的等同物或替代品;此外,通过向卫生专业人员提交一份调查,在实际条件下对其进行了测试,卫生专业人员认为该产品可靠且有用。结论:该算法可作为一种合理的工具,帮助卫生经营者找到解决药品短缺的方法。这项工作突出了主管当局应解决的当前ATC归属的一些限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信