Care Providers' and Parents' Experiences with Implementing the Conversational Health Literacy Assessment Tool (CHAT)-Maternity-Care in the Netherlands: A Mixed Methods Study.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Evi M E Vlassak, Judit K J Keulen, Elina Miteniece, Rianneke de Ritter, Marijke J C Hendrix, Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze
{"title":"Care Providers' and Parents' Experiences with Implementing the Conversational Health Literacy Assessment Tool (CHAT)-Maternity-Care in the Netherlands: A Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Evi M E Vlassak, Judit K J Keulen, Elina Miteniece, Rianneke de Ritter, Marijke J C Hendrix, Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13101173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Care providers' understanding of patients' health literacy is crucial to tailoring care and reducing health inequalities. This study explores the experiences, facilitators, and barriers encountered by maternity care providers when implementing CHAT-maternity-care: a conversational tool that supports care providers in estimating (expectant) parents' health literacy. As a secondary objective, the study also examines the experiences of (expectant) parents. <b>Methods:</b> Maternity care providers used CHAT-maternity-care after finalizing an e-learning. Implementation was evaluated among maternity care providers with a questionnaire and in-depth focus group meetings and among (expectant) parents with semi-structured interviews. <b>Results:</b> Providers experienced that using CHAT-maternity-care enhanced their health literacy insight, improved health literacy awareness, and fostered easier, more comprehensive and structured estimation of parents' health literacy. Key facilitators for implementing CHAT-maternity-care as perceived by providers were the perceived value of health literacy insights; the tool's relevance, user-friendliness, and familiarity; and social factors. The main barriers were time constraints, the tool's novelty, and social factors. (Expectant) parents were positive and open to having conversations based on CHAT-maternity-care. Questions based on CHAT-maternity-care were perceived as beneficial by parents in uncovering previously unaddressed concerns. <b>Conclusions:</b> CHAT-maternity-care is mostly well received and assessed as helpful to improving health literacy insights. The findings underscore the importance of education, peer support, and organizational alignment for broader adoption and implementation of CHAT-maternity-care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12111618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Care providers' understanding of patients' health literacy is crucial to tailoring care and reducing health inequalities. This study explores the experiences, facilitators, and barriers encountered by maternity care providers when implementing CHAT-maternity-care: a conversational tool that supports care providers in estimating (expectant) parents' health literacy. As a secondary objective, the study also examines the experiences of (expectant) parents. Methods: Maternity care providers used CHAT-maternity-care after finalizing an e-learning. Implementation was evaluated among maternity care providers with a questionnaire and in-depth focus group meetings and among (expectant) parents with semi-structured interviews. Results: Providers experienced that using CHAT-maternity-care enhanced their health literacy insight, improved health literacy awareness, and fostered easier, more comprehensive and structured estimation of parents' health literacy. Key facilitators for implementing CHAT-maternity-care as perceived by providers were the perceived value of health literacy insights; the tool's relevance, user-friendliness, and familiarity; and social factors. The main barriers were time constraints, the tool's novelty, and social factors. (Expectant) parents were positive and open to having conversations based on CHAT-maternity-care. Questions based on CHAT-maternity-care were perceived as beneficial by parents in uncovering previously unaddressed concerns. Conclusions: CHAT-maternity-care is mostly well received and assessed as helpful to improving health literacy insights. The findings underscore the importance of education, peer support, and organizational alignment for broader adoption and implementation of CHAT-maternity-care.

护理提供者和父母实施会话健康素养评估工具(CHAT)的经验-荷兰的孕产妇保健:一项混合方法研究。
背景/目的:护理提供者对患者健康素养的了解对于定制护理和减少卫生不平等至关重要。本研究探讨了产科保健提供者在实施chat -孕产妇保健时遇到的经验、促进因素和障碍:这是一种支持护理提供者估计(准)父母健康素养的对话工具。作为次要目标,该研究还调查了(准)父母的经历。方法:产妇保健提供者在完成电子学习后使用chat -产妇保健。通过问卷调查和深入的焦点小组会议对产妇护理提供者的实施情况进行了评估,并对(准)父母进行了半结构化访谈。结果:提供者体验到,使用chat -孕产妇保健增强了他们的健康素养洞察力,提高了健康素养意识,并促进了对父母健康素养的更容易、更全面和更结构化的估计。提供者认为实施chat -孕产妇保健的主要促进因素是卫生素养见解的感知价值;工具的相关性、用户友好性和熟悉度;还有社会因素。主要的障碍是时间限制、工具的新颖性和社会因素。(准)父母对基于chat -孕产保健的对话持积极和开放态度。父母认为,基于chat -孕产妇保健的问题有助于发现以前未解决的问题。结论:chat -孕产妇保健大多受到好评,并被评估为有助于提高卫生素养见解。研究结果强调了教育、同伴支持和组织协调对于更广泛地采用和实施chat -孕产妇保健的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信