Barriers to Physical Activity in Low-Income Older Adults Living in Senior Housing.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carolyn Kalata, Ramon Reyes, Kamal Kuhail, Janet L Larson, Weiyun Chen
{"title":"Barriers to Physical Activity in Low-Income Older Adults Living in Senior Housing.","authors":"Carolyn Kalata, Ramon Reyes, Kamal Kuhail, Janet L Larson, Weiyun Chen","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13101159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While a majority of older adults fail to engage in recommended levels of physical activity (PA), lower-income older adults face unique challenges. They are at greater risk for low levels of PA, but little is known about the barriers they face.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate self-reported PA and barriers to PA for older adult residents of subsidized low-income senior housing, comparing barriers for those with lower and higher levels of PA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-two older adults (mean age 76.57 (SD = 7.50)) were recruited from low-income senior housing facilities. They completed a demographic questionnaire, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), which measures MET-minutes/week of engaging in vigorous, moderate, and light PA levels, and the 27-item Inventory of Physical Activity Barriers (IPAB), which measures multifaceted barriers to PA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common barrier for all residents was the PA priority. Independent <i>t</i>-tests revealed that the low-active group faced greater barriers than the high-active group in physical health barriers (<i>t</i> = 2.329, <i>p</i> = 0.022), PA priority of (<i>t</i> = 2.836, <i>p</i> = 0.006), environmental barriers (<i>t</i> = 2.072, <i>p</i> = 0.042), and total PA barriers (<i>t</i> = 2.281, <i>p</i> = 0.025). No significant differences were found between the low-active and high-active groups for emotional health barriers, skill barriers, external factor barriers, and social barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The low-active older adults were less likely to overcome barriers, such as physical health issues, PA priority, and environmental factors. Further research is necessary to gain a deeper understanding of the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of these barriers and to develop effective strategies for addressing them. However, findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the small and convenient sample and potential bias from self-reported PA measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13101159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While a majority of older adults fail to engage in recommended levels of physical activity (PA), lower-income older adults face unique challenges. They are at greater risk for low levels of PA, but little is known about the barriers they face.

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate self-reported PA and barriers to PA for older adult residents of subsidized low-income senior housing, comparing barriers for those with lower and higher levels of PA.

Methods: Ninety-two older adults (mean age 76.57 (SD = 7.50)) were recruited from low-income senior housing facilities. They completed a demographic questionnaire, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), which measures MET-minutes/week of engaging in vigorous, moderate, and light PA levels, and the 27-item Inventory of Physical Activity Barriers (IPAB), which measures multifaceted barriers to PA.

Results: The most common barrier for all residents was the PA priority. Independent t-tests revealed that the low-active group faced greater barriers than the high-active group in physical health barriers (t = 2.329, p = 0.022), PA priority of (t = 2.836, p = 0.006), environmental barriers (t = 2.072, p = 0.042), and total PA barriers (t = 2.281, p = 0.025). No significant differences were found between the low-active and high-active groups for emotional health barriers, skill barriers, external factor barriers, and social barriers.

Conclusions: The low-active older adults were less likely to overcome barriers, such as physical health issues, PA priority, and environmental factors. Further research is necessary to gain a deeper understanding of the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of these barriers and to develop effective strategies for addressing them. However, findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the small and convenient sample and potential bias from self-reported PA measures.

居住在老年住房的低收入老年人身体活动的障碍。
虽然大多数老年人没有达到建议的身体活动水平,但低收入老年人面临着独特的挑战。他们患低水平PA的风险更大,但对他们面临的障碍知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在调查保障性低收入老年住房老年人自我报告的生活自理状况和生活自理障碍,比较生活自理水平较低和较高老年人的生活自理障碍。方法:从低收入老年人养老机构招募92名老年人,平均年龄76.57岁(SD = 7.50)。他们完成了一份人口调查问卷,国际体育活动问卷(IPAQ),该问卷测量了每周从事剧烈、中度和轻度体育活动的分钟数,以及27项体育活动障碍清单(IPAB),该清单测量了体育活动的多方面障碍。结果:所有居民最常见的障碍是PA优先级。独立t检验结果显示,低运动组在身体健康障碍(t = 2.329, p = 0.022)、PA优先级障碍(t = 2.836, p = 0.006)、环境障碍(t = 2.072, p = 0.042)和PA总障碍(t = 2.281, p = 0.025)方面均大于高运动组。低运动组和高运动组在情绪健康障碍、技能障碍、外部因素障碍和社会障碍方面均无显著差异。结论:低活动量老年人克服障碍的可能性较小,如身体健康问题、PA优先级和环境因素。有必要进行进一步的研究,以更深入地了解这些障碍的特征和潜在机制,并制定解决这些障碍的有效战略。然而,由于样本量小且方便,且自报PA测量可能存在偏倚,研究结果应谨慎解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信