The implementation and evaluation of the Ontario COVID@Home Clinical Primary Care Pathway.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dee Mangin, Jennifer Salerno, Rebecca Clark, Julie Datta, Jennifer Lawson, Mara Dempsey, Dawn Elston, Shuaib Hafid, David Price, David Kaplan, Cathy Risdon, Casey Irvin, Erin Beaulieu
{"title":"The implementation and evaluation of the Ontario COVID@Home Clinical Primary Care Pathway.","authors":"Dee Mangin, Jennifer Salerno, Rebecca Clark, Julie Datta, Jennifer Lawson, Mara Dempsey, Dawn Elston, Shuaib Hafid, David Price, David Kaplan, Cathy Risdon, Casey Irvin, Erin Beaulieu","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID@Home Clinical Care Pathway (the Pathway) was developed and implemented as an evidence-based remote monitoring clinical care pathway for the integrated management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the province of Ontario, Canada. We examine its effectiveness and rapid large-scale implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a prospective longitudinal study design, we used electronic medical record clinical data, provider and patient surveys, web analytics, healthcare and provincial utilization, and government holdings data to evaluate reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance outcomes, including patient mortality and health equity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Pathway was widely accessed (19 474 Ontario unique users), contributed 28 816 oxygen saturation monitors, and achieved coverage across income levels and geography. Two-thirds of patients had > 1 encounter, monitored for a median of 4 days (Range: 1-57). Fifty percent of patients had > 1 chronic condition. Patients receiving Pathway care were less likely to die by 0.44% (20/4556), two times lower compared to the total mortality of a population-based representative patient cohort over a parallel time period in Ontario of 0.86% (1820/212 326, P = .0023). Patients were very satisfied with their care, and felt care was accessible, safe, and clear. Providers were very satisfied with the Pathway resources and reported strengthened relationships across the health system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary care (PC) rapidly implemented a clinical care pathway during the COVID-19 crisis. The Pathway demonstrated the beneficial role and effectiveness of PC when patients are provided with timely, accessible, and comprehensive care. Public health responses should explicitly collaborate with PC to address population health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"42 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmaf022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID@Home Clinical Care Pathway (the Pathway) was developed and implemented as an evidence-based remote monitoring clinical care pathway for the integrated management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the province of Ontario, Canada. We examine its effectiveness and rapid large-scale implementation.

Methods: Using a prospective longitudinal study design, we used electronic medical record clinical data, provider and patient surveys, web analytics, healthcare and provincial utilization, and government holdings data to evaluate reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance outcomes, including patient mortality and health equity.

Results: The Pathway was widely accessed (19 474 Ontario unique users), contributed 28 816 oxygen saturation monitors, and achieved coverage across income levels and geography. Two-thirds of patients had > 1 encounter, monitored for a median of 4 days (Range: 1-57). Fifty percent of patients had > 1 chronic condition. Patients receiving Pathway care were less likely to die by 0.44% (20/4556), two times lower compared to the total mortality of a population-based representative patient cohort over a parallel time period in Ontario of 0.86% (1820/212 326, P = .0023). Patients were very satisfied with their care, and felt care was accessible, safe, and clear. Providers were very satisfied with the Pathway resources and reported strengthened relationships across the health system.

Conclusions: Primary care (PC) rapidly implemented a clinical care pathway during the COVID-19 crisis. The Pathway demonstrated the beneficial role and effectiveness of PC when patients are provided with timely, accessible, and comprehensive care. Public health responses should explicitly collaborate with PC to address population health.

安大略省COVID@Home临床初级保健途径的实施和评估。
背景:COVID@Home临床护理路径(以下简称路径)是加拿大安大略省制定并实施的基于证据的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)综合管理的远程监测临床护理路径。我们检查其有效性和快速大规模实施。方法:采用前瞻性纵向研究设计,我们使用电子病历临床数据、提供者和患者调查、网络分析、医疗保健和省级利用以及政府持有数据来评估覆盖范围、有效性、采用、实施和维护结果,包括患者死亡率和健康公平性。结果:该途径被广泛使用(安大略省独立用户19 474人),提供28 816台血氧饱和度监测仪,实现了跨收入水平和地理区域的覆盖。三分之二的患者出现bbb1,监测时间中位数为4天(范围:1-57天)。50%的患者患有bbb1慢性疾病。接受Pathway治疗的患者死亡率降低了0.44%(20/4556),与安大略省同期以人群为基础的代表性患者队列的总死亡率0.86% (1820/212 326,P = 0.0023)相比,降低了两倍。患者对他们的护理非常满意,并感到护理是可获得的、安全的和明确的。提供者对途径资源非常满意,并报告整个卫生系统的关系得到加强。结论:在COVID-19危机期间,初级保健(PC)迅速实施了临床护理途径。该途径表明,当患者获得及时、可及和全面的护理时,PC的有益作用和有效性。公共卫生应对措施应明确与PC合作,以解决人口健康问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信