Baba Yogesh, Matthias Heindorf, Rebecca Jordan, Georg B Keller
{"title":"Quantification of the effect of hemodynamic occlusion in two-photon imaging of mouse cortex.","authors":"Baba Yogesh, Matthias Heindorf, Rebecca Jordan, Georg B Keller","doi":"10.7554/eLife.104914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The last few years have seen an explosion in the number of tools available to measure neuronal activity using fluorescence imaging (Chen et al., 2013; Feng et al., 2019; Jing et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2018; Wan et al., 2021). When performed in vivo, these measurements are invariably contaminated by hemodynamic occlusion artifacts. In widefield calcium imaging, this problem is well recognized. For two-photon imaging, however, the effects of hemodynamic occlusion have only been sparsely characterized. Here, we perform a quantification of hemodynamic occlusion effects using measurements of fluorescence changes observed with GFP expression using both widefield and two-photon imaging in mouse cortex. We find that in many instances the magnitude of signal changes attributable to hemodynamic occlusion is comparable to that observed with activity sensors. Moreover, we find that hemodynamic occlusion effects were spatially heterogeneous, both over cortical regions and across cortical depth, and exhibited a complex relationship with behavior. Thus, hemodynamic occlusion is an important caveat to consider when analyzing and interpreting not just widefield but also two-photon imaging data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104914","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The last few years have seen an explosion in the number of tools available to measure neuronal activity using fluorescence imaging (Chen et al., 2013; Feng et al., 2019; Jing et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2018; Wan et al., 2021). When performed in vivo, these measurements are invariably contaminated by hemodynamic occlusion artifacts. In widefield calcium imaging, this problem is well recognized. For two-photon imaging, however, the effects of hemodynamic occlusion have only been sparsely characterized. Here, we perform a quantification of hemodynamic occlusion effects using measurements of fluorescence changes observed with GFP expression using both widefield and two-photon imaging in mouse cortex. We find that in many instances the magnitude of signal changes attributable to hemodynamic occlusion is comparable to that observed with activity sensors. Moreover, we find that hemodynamic occlusion effects were spatially heterogeneous, both over cortical regions and across cortical depth, and exhibited a complex relationship with behavior. Thus, hemodynamic occlusion is an important caveat to consider when analyzing and interpreting not just widefield but also two-photon imaging data.
过去几年来,使用荧光成像测量神经元活动的工具数量激增(Chen et al., 2013;Feng et al., 2019;Jing et al., 2019;Sun et al., 2018;Wan et al., 2021)。当在体内进行时,这些测量总是受到血流动力学阻塞伪影的污染。在宽视场钙成像中,这个问题是公认的。然而,对于双光子成像,血流动力学阻塞的影响只有稀疏的特征。在这里,我们使用宽视场和双光子成像在小鼠皮质中观察到的荧光变化来测量血流动力学闭塞效应。我们发现,在许多情况下,可归因于血流动力学闭塞的信号变化幅度与活动传感器观察到的相当。此外,我们发现血流动力学闭塞效应在空间上是不均匀的,在皮质区域和皮质深度上都是如此,并且与行为表现出复杂的关系。因此,在分析和解释不仅是宽视场,而且是双光子成像数据时,血流动力学闭塞是一个重要的注意事项。
期刊介绍:
eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as:
Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings.
Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article.
Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research.
Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field.
Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles.
Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.