Flavio Gössi, Christoph Becker, Sebastian Gross, Armon Arpagaus, Stefano Bassetti, Sabina Hunziker
{"title":"Communication on Rounds: The Role of Rounds Culture and Communication in Patient Care and Teaching.","authors":"Flavio Gössi, Christoph Becker, Sebastian Gross, Armon Arpagaus, Stefano Bassetti, Sabina Hunziker","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The daily visit by the treating doctor or medical team at the bedside of the hospitalized patient («rounds») is essential for patient-centered care and interprofessional exchange.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review is based on pertinent publications (up to December 2024) that were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed/Medline database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bedside rounds are used to fulfill multiple tasks: medical, communicative, and educational. Complex social interactions, in particular, require precise and empathetic communication. 71% of patients say they primarily expect clear information about their medical situation. Information exchange can nonetheless be difficult, particularly with older and frail patients. So-called teach-back techniques improve patients' understanding of medications and behavioral instructions (OR 1.84 [1.09; 3.12] and 1.83 [1.07; 3.13], respectively). Although many patients would like to take active part in discussions on rounds, the physicians explicitly encouraged them to do so in only 54% of cases. If the team discusses the patient outside the room before entering, the patient's understanding of their condition is no different, but they are less likely to be confused by medical technology (21.3 versus 13.7); team satisfaction is higher (78.0 versus 68.3), and there is more opportunity to discuss sensitive topics (84.3 versus 59.3, each on a visual analog scale VAS 1-100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interprofessional discussion of the patient and suitable communication on rounds can improve patient care and are essential for undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"362-370"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The daily visit by the treating doctor or medical team at the bedside of the hospitalized patient («rounds») is essential for patient-centered care and interprofessional exchange.
Methods: This narrative review is based on pertinent publications (up to December 2024) that were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed/Medline database.
Results: Bedside rounds are used to fulfill multiple tasks: medical, communicative, and educational. Complex social interactions, in particular, require precise and empathetic communication. 71% of patients say they primarily expect clear information about their medical situation. Information exchange can nonetheless be difficult, particularly with older and frail patients. So-called teach-back techniques improve patients' understanding of medications and behavioral instructions (OR 1.84 [1.09; 3.12] and 1.83 [1.07; 3.13], respectively). Although many patients would like to take active part in discussions on rounds, the physicians explicitly encouraged them to do so in only 54% of cases. If the team discusses the patient outside the room before entering, the patient's understanding of their condition is no different, but they are less likely to be confused by medical technology (21.3 versus 13.7); team satisfaction is higher (78.0 versus 68.3), and there is more opportunity to discuss sensitive topics (84.3 versus 59.3, each on a visual analog scale VAS 1-100).
Conclusion: Interprofessional discussion of the patient and suitable communication on rounds can improve patient care and are essential for undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education.
期刊介绍:
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence.
The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include:
Carelit
CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature)
Compendex
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database)
EMNursing
GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data)
HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative)
Index Copernicus
Medline (MEDLARS Online)
Medpilot
PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database)
Science Citation Index Expanded
Scopus
By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.