Communication on Rounds: The Role of Rounds Culture and Communication in Patient Care and Teaching.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Flavio Gössi, Christoph Becker, Sebastian Gross, Armon Arpagaus, Stefano Bassetti, Sabina Hunziker
{"title":"Communication on Rounds: The Role of Rounds Culture and Communication in Patient Care and Teaching.","authors":"Flavio Gössi, Christoph Becker, Sebastian Gross, Armon Arpagaus, Stefano Bassetti, Sabina Hunziker","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The daily visit by the treating doctor or medical team at the bedside of the hospitalized patient («rounds») is essential for patient-centered care and interprofessional exchange.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review is based on pertinent publications (up to December 2024) that were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed/Medline database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bedside rounds are used to fulfill multiple tasks: medical, communicative, and educational. Complex social interactions, in particular, require precise and empathetic communication. 71% of patients say they primarily expect clear information about their medical situation. Information exchange can nonetheless be difficult, particularly with older and frail patients. So-called teach-back techniques improve patients' understanding of medications and behavioral instructions (OR 1.84 [1.09; 3.12] and 1.83 [1.07; 3.13], respectively). Although many patients would like to take active part in discussions on rounds, the physicians explicitly encouraged them to do so in only 54% of cases. If the team discusses the patient outside the room before entering, the patient's understanding of their condition is no different, but they are less likely to be confused by medical technology (21.3 versus 13.7); team satisfaction is higher (78.0 versus 68.3), and there is more opportunity to discuss sensitive topics (84.3 versus 59.3, each on a visual analog scale VAS 1-100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interprofessional discussion of the patient and suitable communication on rounds can improve patient care and are essential for undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"362-370"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The daily visit by the treating doctor or medical team at the bedside of the hospitalized patient («rounds») is essential for patient-centered care and interprofessional exchange.

Methods: This narrative review is based on pertinent publications (up to December 2024) that were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed/Medline database.

Results: Bedside rounds are used to fulfill multiple tasks: medical, communicative, and educational. Complex social interactions, in particular, require precise and empathetic communication. 71% of patients say they primarily expect clear information about their medical situation. Information exchange can nonetheless be difficult, particularly with older and frail patients. So-called teach-back techniques improve patients' understanding of medications and behavioral instructions (OR 1.84 [1.09; 3.12] and 1.83 [1.07; 3.13], respectively). Although many patients would like to take active part in discussions on rounds, the physicians explicitly encouraged them to do so in only 54% of cases. If the team discusses the patient outside the room before entering, the patient's understanding of their condition is no different, but they are less likely to be confused by medical technology (21.3 versus 13.7); team satisfaction is higher (78.0 versus 68.3), and there is more opportunity to discuss sensitive topics (84.3 versus 59.3, each on a visual analog scale VAS 1-100).

Conclusion: Interprofessional discussion of the patient and suitable communication on rounds can improve patient care and are essential for undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing medical education.

查房交流:查房文化和交流在病人护理和教学中的作用。
背景:治疗医生或医疗团队在住院患者床边的日常访问(“查房”)对于以患者为中心的护理和跨专业交流至关重要。方法:本叙述性综述基于PubMed/Medline数据库中选择性检索的相关出版物(截至2024年12月)。结果:床边查房被用来完成多种任务:医疗、交流和教育。特别是复杂的社会互动,需要精确和移情的沟通。71%的患者表示,他们主要希望获得有关其医疗状况的明确信息。尽管如此,信息交流仍然是困难的,尤其是对老年人和体弱多病的患者。所谓的反教技术提高了患者对药物和行为指示的理解(OR 1.84 [1.09;3.12]和1.83 [1.07;分别为3.13])。尽管很多病人愿意在查房时积极参与讨论,但医生明确鼓励他们这样做的病例仅占54%。如果团队在进入房间之前在室外与患者进行讨论,患者对自己病情的了解没有什么不同,但他们不太可能被医疗技术所迷惑(21.3比13.7);团队满意度更高(78.0比68.3),并且有更多的机会讨论敏感话题(84.3比59.3,每个都在视觉模拟量表VAS 1-100上)。结论:在查房时进行患者的跨专业讨论和适当的沟通可以改善患者护理,对本科、研究生和继续医学教育至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信